NewStats: 3,264,418 , 8,183,679 topics. Date: Wednesday, 11 June 2025 at 01:48 AM 3r3i4

Sack him then rehire him so he could have another second season 😂

Alamkiir:
This survey shows how many Jewish Israelis ethnic cleansing and the killing of an entire population.

It’s another reminder that anyone claiming “it’s just the government” or “just Netanyahu” is lying, it’s Israeli society.

Majority of Israel is secular.


Anyway links to how this survey was carried out?

WritterNg:


If Hamas have been completely destroyed, according to some bozos here..... Who is Israel negotiating ceasefires with then??



🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🇮🇱 🇺🇸 🇪🇺 🇬🇧 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡

If Ukraine had been defeated according to some bozos here who is Russia negotiating ceasefireis with then?


You can see how stupid the above statement is yours is even more so

Bigsam99:
Its either you reason with your anus or you are so malicious that you would see white and call it black. Wake up bro, people around you are not as you.

You said it was Arabs that left their homes because they want to 'drive the Jews to the sea' and I explained how stupid that statement was because it is on record that the Arabs left because the Jews were killing them during the Nakba. Today, the Gazans are trying to avoid leaving because they know that's what the Israelis want so they can take over Gaźa. It's like another Nakba.

That is why they are enduring untold suffering just because they don't want to run away again.

Okay are you saying the Arabs did not tell the Palestinians to evacuate? Because it's a known fact. True some left due to the fear of being killed by Israelis. But then others left because they were ordered by the Arabs to leave so they don't get caught in the cross fire. You called it a massacre the majority of deaths in that war were combatants.

Bigsam99:
You are so silly you are begito.make false assumptions.

The Arabs did not evacuate because they wanted to 'drive the Jews to the sea'. Why would anybody want to vacate their ancestral land. Do you think you are talking to idiots? The Nakba, massacre of entire Arab populations so that European Jews would live in their homes, is a well documented fact. Why are you trying to twist history?

Well you're proving to be an idiot because the nakbah is primarily about the expulsion of Palestinians Arabs what you describe as a massacre isn't do you know that if you combine both the deaths of Israelis and Arabs during that war the current Gaza war dwarfs it.


In some areas the Jews did expel Palestinians because of the fear that they would aid the Arabs and some communities did but then even the Arabs ordered some communities to evacuate so they won't be caught in the cross fire. They promised them they could come back after chasing the Jews to into the sea. An article was written on this.

Where do you think the 20% percent Arab population of Israel came from they are decendants of Arabs who did not aid the invasion of Israel and they did not evacuate.

Any lands the Palestinians lost they lost in battle they should declared their state but they didn't that's on them.

Bigsam99:
So why can't they just buy land and live in peace along side their neighbours the Arabs. But they had to take half of the whole land and when the Arabs rebelled against this injustice they are labelled as savages.

Gold Meir and many early Zionists lived in Palestine and carried Palestinian port. Why did they carve out a specific area and make it exclusive for only Jews?

Don't be a dunce if it was exclusively for only jews why did the Arabs tell the Palestinians Arabs that where living in newly formed israel to evacuate so they could chase the Jews into the sea?


Those who did not evacuate are the over 20% Arabs now that are citizens of the state of Israel.


When israel was formed the Arabs who lived in Israel were considered as Israeli and part of Israel should they desire it.

So what nonsense exclusivity are you talking about?

Bigsam99:
Yes there are Bantus in Nigeria. There are people on the Mambilla plateu who speak the same language till this day. There was never a need to create a Jewish state.The creation of a Jewish state on one half of Palestine definitely displaced people. Remenber Jews and Arabs lived side by side on the land until the European Jews who had no land in Palestine arrived. It was a great fraud and wickedness.
Every Palestinian Jew had their own land and could have easily belonged to a state of Palestine with power sharing between Jews and Palestine. Why did those wicked Jews from Europe forcefully carve out a peaceful Palestine with the help of their European friends?

That's were you get it wrong yes Palestinian Jews had lands but were dhimis under the ottoman empire who the bristish took over Palestine from. Pogroms and Violence were constant
From 1830, there were recurring instances of violence against Jewish communities in Palestine, driven by a desire to prevent the establishment of a Jewish state and discourage Jewish immigration. Jews will never be safe in a Palestine where Muslims are the majority.


Jews migrated even from middle eastern countries reasons being persecution.

More Jews were expelled from middle eastern countries than Palestinians expelled from Palestine.

I don't know where you wanted those Jews to go.

Again European Jews were the most persecuted ethnicity in Europe maybe after blacks.

I get it the Jews are the only know people to return to a land that they have migrated from Some will say it's a miracle I'm very religious I believe that.


The Jews deserve a land where they are safe only Israel guarantees that.

Bigsam99:
The whole premise of the existence of a Jewish state was wrong from the onset, why won't the aArabs protest it.

Somebody came to your house and asked you to divide your house into 2 just because his ancestor used to live there 2 thousand years ago. When you protest, he in alliance with his powerful friends kill your children, forcefully takes the part he likes and fences you off. Then anytime you come out the enclosement to try to reclaim your land they label you terrorists.

Brother, if you are living in Southern Nigeria, chances are that you are living on a land that belonged to the Bantu tribes 1,000 years ago. The Bantus are currently in South Africa. Imagine if one day, somebody tells you that your village should be split in 2 because the Bantus are back. I hope you will gladly forfeit half of your father's land.

Jews have always been in the land you can't find a single Bantu here in southern Nigeria.


There was never a period that the Jewish population became zero.

They only went from being the absolute majority to being a minority.

Jews then had the biggest diaspora in the world they still do till today.

Akhaz024:

The blame should go to blood thirsty Netanyahu, you all jubilated when he was agressive initially, you were counting scores the numbers of Hamas official he has sent to the virgin land. Now does it solve anything.

Jewish citizens are not longer safe, God so good the incident happened in the US not a Muslim countries.

Why should Hamas drop their guns, when the US and Israel fail to recognize Palestine as a sovereign state.

Like I suspected a terrorist sympathiser pretending to be moderate.


They have held those guns since how long it hasn't given them Palestine.


Jews have never been safe before Nateyahu before Hitler Jews have always been killed and persecuted.

Akhaz024:


You are the one actually being stupid here, by assuming I ed the killings.
So you now see how it feels by killing innocent one who knew nothing about the war..

Because you can't tell me that thousand of children Israel has killed and starved are also in of the war.

Drop the pretence Oga.

If you didn't you'd know that the two scenarios are different children die in wars . It is inevitable since the dawn of modern weapons civilian casualties in wars has gone up. Israel doesn't go around killing children for nothing it is unfortunate that children die but then it's inevitable. The other were killed in cold blood execution still because they are Jews planned and deliberate.

Israel has repeatedly said that the war ends when Hamas surrenders drop their guns releases the hostages and leave the Gaza strip.


Simple and clear. On the issue of starvation read this Hamas is calling on Gaza residents not to accept food from the new Israeli aid mechanism that began operating today.

Hamas’s Interior Ministry warns Gaza residents against cooperating with the new Israeli food distribution mechanism, claiming its purpose is “the occupation’s takeover of aid distribution in the Strip.”

The Hamas ministry adds:

Israel is funding the mechanism through the “Gaza” aid fund and is violating international law by operating it.

Gazans have the right to receive aid at their place of residence under international law. Cooperating with the occupation’s mechanism threatens the work of international organizations.

If the mechanism fails, the occupation will be forced to resume aid deliveries through the previous format — via the UN and international organizations.

The occupation will attempt to conduct security intelligence gathering through the mechanism.

So… is there really a famine there if people are called not to get food offered to them? Or is it all about the money and power that the UN and Hamas are so eager never to lose….


Israel sometimes block aid yes that's true because hamas usually hijack this aid and sell to finance their war.

Akhaz024:


Where else do you want Hamas to operate? Have you ever view gaza from Google maps?
Gaza is just a city state which is densely populated.
So , Canada, UN, ICC and other world bodies who condemn Israel atrocities in Gaza are liars.

Yeah and despite that the Deaths are less than 60k. Millions die when a genocide is being carried out population do not go up.

Akhaz024:


If you say that palastinian deserve the ill treatment just because of Hamas,
Then same to the Israeli couples being killed because of the atrocities being committed by the Israeli government.
( Based on your analogy )

Don't be stupid the Palestinians are in an active war zone where Hamas uses them as human shields. Many Hamas operatives and leaders have been killed in highly populated CIVILLIAN areas.


Just say you the killing of Jews in of Palestine.


Let's not forget that this war is a consequence of killing and kidnapping Jews by Hamas that the majority of gazans .

SonOfWords:


And so?

What's Israel doing in Palestine? What's the US doing in Greenland?

As na only Russia dey sabi give you orgasms so.

What did the US do in Greenland?


Palestine legally partitioned between the Jews and Arabs. Arabs attacked the Jews and lost lands.


Russia attacked Ukraine for reasons that I feel are vague except someone explain to me the reason for the attack

cococandy:


If you cared about deformed/disabled children so much you wouldn’t take the side of republicans. But that’s topic for another day.

I’m advocating the woman be allowed to rest in peace.
Before the advancement of medicine, what did people do when death came? They died. Was anyone accused of killing their unborn children because they allowed nature to take its course? I think not.

You trying to frame it as killing a child is that typical republican redefinition you guys do when you want to lie through your teeth and paint your perceived opponents in a bad light.

It’s one thing if the baby was viable before this happened. then we can say it’s a living baby that can exist in its own outside of its host. Therefore efforts to save it would make sense.

But solely keeping her body alive for months to grow a baby is a prime example of not seeing women as human.

A dead person is not human anymore its a corpse. I told you abortion should be allowed when the child is a danger to the woman that should tell you something.

cococandy:


If you cared about deformed/disabled children so much you wouldn’t take the side of republicans. But that’s topic for another day.

I’m advocating the woman be allowed to rest in peace.
Before the advancement of medicine, what did people do when death came? They died. Was anyone accused of killing their unborn children because they allowed nature to take its course? I think not.

You trying to frame it as killing a child is that typical republican redefinition you guys do when you want to lie through your teeth and paint your perceived opponents in a bad light.

It’s one thing if the baby was viable before this happened. then we can say it’s a living baby that can exist in its own outside of its host. Therefore efforts to save it would make sense.

But solely keeping her body alive for months to grow a baby is a prime example of not seeing women as human.

I'm advocating that they should let the child that has a chance at living a full life live. The woman will finally be put to rest the child will not get another shot at life.

cococandy:

A 9 week old fetus (that’s when her order started) is not your grand daughter
Humanizing it so as to take away agency from a full human woman is not the winning argument you think it is.

Yes it is life starts at conception.

If woman can call an unborn 9 months old fetus their baby Then that baby is my granddaughter.

cococandy:

Have you ever nursed anyone on life before? If you have you won’t be saying this

I’m saying this is a decision for the woman and her family. Simple and short. No ifs and buts.

The govt shouldn’t have a say on it.
Biggest example of govt overreach if I ever saw
one.

Your statement in bold confirmed for me that you are probably not worth arguing with. A woman who decides to get rid of the result of sexual assault is punishing an innocent child? 🙄

You people really are the same wherever you find yourselves. A special breed of people that’s for sure

Was it the child that assaulted her. Did the child tell the person to assault her. A child that will grow up to call her mummy and love her gets killed because we'll he is a product of an assault he or she doesn't know of. Is the woman on life died or not she is. So let's make the living our priority. The government is rigth to priotise the right of a living being to a dead human

cococandy:


You’re making assumptions on her behalf.

Yes people do stay for extended periods on life (not years. That’s just false information). People stay on extended life when there’s hope for recovery. Sometimes there’s no hope but the family is having a hard time letting go. We give them time to grieve and finally make the decision to pull the plug. But the patient and the family are given the choice to make this decision on their own. Where the patient doesn’t have an advanced directive for an incident like this, the next person on the family tree is given the choice to make that decision.
The list goes
patient (or parents if a minor)
spouse
adult children
adult siblings if none of the above is present

In extenuating circumstances where a patient has chosen a power of attorney with a clear mind and under no duress before losing their ability to make their own decisions, then that POA supersedes all the above.

What the govt is doing here is inserting themselves intimately into people’s lives to say they have ultimate power over their bodily autonomy above everyone listed above. Yet the Republicans keep claiming they are the party of small govt. no greater irony has ever existed than that statement.

And yes all the stuff I described earlier does happen to them on life . Recurrent UTIs, pneumonia, They can’t eat they have to be fed via peg tubes. Can’t breathe they have to be on a ventilator. Bed sores down to the bones if they’re not being turned at least every 2 hours. You can see their sacral bones peeking from their rotting flesh. It’s torturous awful existence that death is a mercy.

This started when she was 9 weeks pregnant. So many months of torture because you guys can’t get yourselves to see women as more than cattle for breeding new offspring.

I once had a guy on life for two months because the family couldn’t make up their minds on what to do. Despite every kind of care you give, they basically rot from the inside out (for want of a better word).

It’s a disgusting thing the state of Georgia is doing. Simple and short.

First there is no upper limit on how one can be on life .


But then you forget they are doing this to potentially save a life of a child an unborn child the woman is practically dead that the family wants to pull the plug. If this was a case of the pregnancy will cause harm to the women then yeah I'm all in for that kind of abortion if it's rape then I leave it to the woman's humanity to show mercy and not punish an innocent child that did nothing wrong. But heck this is about protecting the fundamental right to exist, to live.
Are you saying the child shouldn't get that chance because it's mother is dead?

cococandy:

Not to mention the fetus that is being formed into a baby with this woman’s body is currently showing signs of fluid in the brain (hydrocephalus).

If they survive (BIG IF), they’ll be a human with lifelong disability needing round the clock care. Ask republicans to vote for lifelong free healthcare, free housing, free food, transportation etc for them and the next thing you’ll hear is how they hate handouts. Yet they keep creating situations that lead to less empowered people who need constant help and .

I hope you are not advocating for the child to be killed because of deformities?
hydrocephalus can be treated. If there are fluids in the brain it can be drained even while the baby is in the womb.
The woman isn't surviving the child has a 80% chance of survival.

cococandy:


I used to work in the ICU and I can tell you that what’s involved in keeping that woman’s body alive just so she can be used as an incubator is nothing short of horrendous.

Her body is actively trying to die and they’re doing everything they can to keep her in hell on earth just so she can be used to grow a fetus her family doesn’t even want.

The vasopressors to keep her blood pressure from bottoming out will turn her fingers and toes purple and they’ll eventually die and fall off. Why? Because vasopressors work but constricting the blood vessels and concentrating blood supply to the vital organs only. It’s a dire last resort solution that’s only intended to be used as a short term solution before the patient is stabilized or unfortunately es on. In her case she’s gone so what they are doing is basically desecrating a corpse.

The ventilator she’s on is just a vector for all kinds of stuff to crawl down her throat and cause respiratory colonization. I guess that doesn’t matter now.

Pretty sure they have all kinds of tubes sticking out her as well. Arterial line, probably a swan ganz, fecal management systems, urinary catheter etc. risk or pressure injuries/decubitus ulcers down to the bone

Most ICU nurses will make you promise to let them go if they ever find themselves in that situation.

Ridiculous pointless torture.

People have be kept on life for years and none of this you said happened to them. This isn't pointless torture the woman is pregnant because she wants the baby I'm sure any woman who genuinely wants a baby that unfortunately is in this situation will tell the doctors to do all they can to save her baby since there's nothing they can do for her.

LordReed:


So if you were the father of the pregnant brain dead woman that is what you'd do?

She's practically dead and if there is a chance my grandchild can be saved than yes that's what I'll do. I won't lose both my daughter and granddaughter

LordReed:
Georgia mother says she is being forced to keep brain-dead pregnant daughter alive under abortion ban law

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/family-forced-keep-brain-dead-pregnant-woman-alive-rcna207002

Basilico, bemeruca and co your thoughts on this.

She should wait until the baby is old enough to be delivered through cs and put in an incubator.

shoodboi2:


Drones are never cheap. It is you pro-Westerners who call them cheap, and you do so because western media told you so. Western media themselves decided the drones are cheap by comparing their prices relative to American ones.

Drones are never about price. They are about effectiveness.

Cost ≠ effectiveness

Being cheap has nothing to do with how effective a drone is. Most weapons are costly but not as costly as what the Americans charge.

A Shahed-type drone shouldn't cost more than $100,000 to manufacture, irrespective of the country. It costs way less than that in Russia and even less in Iran.

But if the Americans built their own Shahed-style drone, they will hype it up and slap a $8 million bill on it. Not because it is expensive to make, but because their military-industrial complex know they can charge such and get away with it.

So, Trump doesn't want those drones because they are cheap. He wants them because they are effective. But he doesn't want to buy them at exorbitant prices.

Man I can literally take screenshots of you bright bulbs calling Iranian drones and even missles cheap Gaza and houthi rockets made out of water pipes. Oh an Iranian $500 drone just destroyed a million dollar patriot system. How Iran's cheap drones cost Israel billions to defend against stuff like this are said by your side.

Anyway I get what you're saying it makes sense if I were trump one of those $30m drones can be used to manufacture a thousand cheap drones overwhelmed the enemies with it let say rain it down on the houthies. If I were the houthies I prefer the $30m drones if they shoot it down it makes the headline 30m reaper drone shot down by the houthies in Yemen if they get killed by it hey at least it took a million dollar drone to take him out.

Watcharena:
Iran and Russia are allies

Russia is a super power Russia uses cheap drones.


The US another super power has seen the advantage of cheap drones.

And now wants to use it to its advantages.


So instead of superpower in the mud it is Superpower becoming more super because it will mean no more $30m drones to shoot at.

And now they'll die by cheap drones.

Watcharena:
world self acclaimed super power in the mud

The axis of resistance is doing well

Don't be stupid even Russia uses Iran's cheap drones.

shoodboi2:


Lol. You all should have your fun. I have taken my time to explain in detail about three times.

Multiple people here have clarified that it has no religious undertone. Even the Indian who has deep knowledge of the Indian military and doesn't like Pakistan, confirmed it has no religious undertone.

If you want to continue to spin a religious undertone to it, just so you can expand your anti-Muslim campaign, then that's your problem.

I have no anti Muslim campaign I just say things as it is .

There was no clarity in what you said.

Bigsam99:
Well, it is in the interest of the US to keep Pakistan weak that way so they can stage secret ops from that country. They knew how unstable Pakistan is and continues to prop up its tyrannical govts. During the soviet invasion of Afghanistan, they used Pakistan to channel weapons to Islamic fighters, including Bin Laden who would later be called a terrorist. He was not a terrorist when he was killing their enemies.

I don't believe the US keeps Pakistan weak. Neither do I think it props up Pakistan's government.

That being the US do have a history of aiding a would be problem to be a problem to them in the future. That I fear may be a fatal flaw.

Bigsam99:
Please submit your proof that those terrorists were funded by the government of Pakistan. , USA is Pakistan's biggest ally. In the first war with India, USA ed Pakistan because India aided North Vietnam.

I have no proof per say but I sure can bet that the US that added Pakistan to the state Sponsors of Terrorism list does.
The United States' State Sponsors of Terrorism designation list describes Pakistan as a terrorist safe haven where individual terrorists and terrorist groups are able to organize, plan, raise funds, communicate, recruit, train, transit, and operate in relative security because of inadequate/ive governance, political will, or both

shoodboi2:


I took my time to explain. 80% of Indians are Hindus. So, almost every Indian you come across will be Hindu. And if you kill an Indian today, he is most likely going to be a Hindu.

It is the same way with Igbos. Almost all Igbos are Christians. So, if you kill an Igbo man today, he will most likely be a Christian. The same also applies to Fulanis. Almost every Fulani man you come across is a Muslim. So, if you kill a Fulani man, he is most likely going to be a Muslim.

So, if a Fulani man then gets attacked by someone who has grievances with the Fulanis, do you say he was attacked for being Fulani or for being Muslim? The logic here is simple unless you insist on taking a religious angle with it for some reasons that are only clear to you.

Yes you did and if this attack was carried out lets say in Mumbai or Chennai then your view is valid it happened in indian Kashmir where the Muslim population is over 60% not just that it happened in pahalgam which has a Muslim population of over 85%.

Let me reverse it let say a terrorist attack in let's say Agra and majority of the deaths are Muslims in a Hindu dominated area.


Or God forbid a terrorist attack in a place like Lagos where Yorubas are the majority and you see a majority igbo Death if that's not a coincidence then its a targeted attack.

Pakistanis have always hated Indians and if you knew history you'd know that it's because of religion.


Historical evidence shows that Islam may spare Jews and christians being children of the book but Hindus na they killed in their millions.

shoodboi2:


Those terrorists attacked Indians and not Hindus. Four in every five Indians is a Hindi, so it makes sense that Hindis will make up a majority of the casualties. A Muslim and Christian were also killed, and so was a person from Nepal.

The attack also did not happen within the main town itself but in a tourist area popular among Indians. On why we have Indians there, I can come up with three reasons:

First, one little-talked fact (which the media isn’t talking about) is the fact that those tourists were taken there by tour and travel companies based in India itself. (I'm separating India and Kashmir to avoid confusion.) So, Indians go from richer areas in India to tourist locations in Kashmir.

Then, Kashmir people themselves, just like you and everyone else, usually don’t go on tourism in their own region. They will rather go to another country and region in India (if they can afford it), rather than be tourists on their own soil. So, they are less likely to be there except as tour guides and service people, like the Muslim guy that was killed.

Also, the attackers will likely be able to tell Kashmir people apart from other regular Indian tribes. Note that Kashmir itself was not part of the pre-Independence India (which also Included Pakistan and Bangladesh). The tribes there are different in looks from Indians and the attacks can tell them apart from the Indians. It’s the same way we can tell a Hausa from a Yoruba or an Igbo from a Fulani.

And all that talk of them asking people to recite Islamic whatever is all hogwash. You think they have the time for all that? I saw several videos of the attack. It happened fast. Like very fast. Jammu and Kashmir are completely filled with Indian soldiers, so the attackers didn't have much time.

And how many Muslims even know that Islamic stuff they were talking about? And what is the assurance that a Muslim that knows it won’t even forget during the panic? They're only doing that to promote anti-Pakistani sentiment since Pakistan is majority Muslim, just as India is predominantly Hindu.

Let's give a good timeline of all the Pakistani government funded terrorist attack on Indians and you'd be suprised that every time they target Hindus mostly.


And you even proved my point they attacked a place they knew will be filled with Hindus even though Kashmir and jammu is a Muslim dominated area.

And so you know the tourist site they were attacked in is in pahalgam which has a Muslim population of over 85% goes to prove this was a targeted attack.


If not the Muslim casualty is supposed to be significantly higher.


I rest my case on this I can't be clearer than this.

Bigsam99:
I deliberately posted this there for the sake of pro-western bots here who eat and drink every misinformation from the western media. I am sure now those who want India to win will dispute this but will never dispute any nonsense CNN puts out in favour of Ukraine or Israel.

CNN mostly mirror the stats that the Gaza health ministry puts out.