NewStats: 3,265,122 , 8,185,734 topics. Date: Friday, 13 June 2025 at 02:49 PM 1g1n50

Bigsam99:
Let me tell you, most people in all Abrahamicb religions will rejoice when misfirtune happens to people of the opposing religion. Its the way we have been brainwashed since birth. Uou have been persecuted by Muslims and so every Muslim you see is evil. So also is a Moslim who sees whats happening in Iraq, Afghanistan and Gaza.

Don't say things I didn't say. I never said I was persecuted by Muslims. Let's be guided.
To your other point about if a Muslim sees what is happening in Gaza, your point will only hold water if they are not the real criminal hiding under the cloak "victims of genocide."
We have seen women and children as suicide bombers, the same group who anyone will want to protect.
In places like that Gaza you talk of, give the Muslims a breathing space and you'll be sorry you did. Israel knows exactly what they are doing and the Arab world themselves know what Hamas and Palestinians seek to achieve.
Have you asked yourself why none of the Arab countries is willing to take the Palestinians as refugees? Have you asked why they don't even donate aid to them. Everyone knows that Hamas is simply a terror tool used by some groups to try to wipe out Israel.

Like I said earlier, the violence of the Palestinians is not the action, it is a reaction to their oppression by the Jews. Mind you, there are also Christians in Palestine and they are in the struggle as well. Nelson Mandela was considered a terrorist before he won the hearts of the western powers.

The reasons for not taking in Palestinian refugees has nothing to do with why they should be oppressed.
There are different middle eastern states with different agendas for Palestine based on what benefits their leaders. Saudi, Qatar, Egypt, and Jordan all have selfish agendas concerning Palestine. Even Iran is not altogether innocent just that it is willing to risk a great deal to protect the Palestinians despite belonging to a different sect of Islam.

Gbadebo19:

Don't say things I didn't say. I never said I was persecuted by Muslims. Let's be guided.
To your other point about if a Muslim sees what is happening in Gaza, your point will only hold water if they are not the real criminal hiding under the cloak "victims of genocide."
We have seen women and children as suicide bombers, the same group who anyone will want to protect.
In places like that Gaza you talk of, give the Muslims a breathing space and you'll be sorry you did. Israel knows exactly what they are doing and the Arab world themselves know what Hamas and Palestinians seek to achieve.
Have you asked yourself why none of the Arab countries is willing to take the Palestinians as refugees? Have you asked why they don't even donate aid to them. Everyone knows that Hamas is simply a terror tool used by some groups to try to wipe out Israel.

FoolishBoy419:
It amazes me that people are still arguing over these Abrahamic religions. They were all fabricated by egocentric, barbaric mass murderers to justify their tyranny. The Jews founded it to justify their mass murder of an indigenous population and take over their lands. The Christians used it to keep their population in darkness and to consolidate power. Islam was also founded to unify Arabia and take over surrounding territories.

The thing is that while Christians eventually adopted a reformed, pussified watered down version of their faith after thousands had been burnt to death, crucified, stoned to death, and beheaded, a great chunk of Muslims insist on maintaining Muhammad's legacy of unwarranted violence and oppression against disbelievers. Muslims would tell you that their prophet fought for self-defense, but that's just lies. All 'peaceful and defensive verses'' in the Quran, most of which were 'revealed' in Mecca when Muhammad had no power, were subsequently abbrogated by the violent ones that came in Media. By Islamic law, anybody that doesn't believe in Allah is to be killed although Jews and Christians can be kept in humiliation and be made to pay taxes. Even with such a condition, Muhammad kicked 2 Jewish tribes out of Media and and got rid of the third one by beheading all their adult males (by adult, I mean those with pubic hair) and enslaving their women and children. Joshua and David did the same thing against innocent people.

I'm sorry if this offends you, but this is the painful truth. I am tired of these nonsensical religious arguments. This is not a one-sided thing. Muslims, Christians, and Jews have been taught that their blood is more precious than those of other mortals, so they struggle to recognize injustice unless they are at the receiving end.

Anybody that goes past the 20th century to justify Israel's actions is irrational and can best be described as a dumb religious extremist. What we are seeing in Palestine is a bunch of Jewish supremacists oppressing and terrorizing a defenceless population and we have 'intellectuals' here who think their morals are superior to those of Boko Haram justifying their actions.

I wish I could like this statement multiple times, the intolerance preached by these three religions are unparalleled.

At some point we need to examine the adverse effect these religions have in our society, I gave up defending any of these religions because you can't do it without looking stupid.

At one point in history all these three religions was able to spread through committing genocide on a scale that has never been seen. The Jews have done it and are still doing it, the Christians did it through colonization, the Muslim did it during the Islamization of the middle east and Africa.

Look at the role Muslim terrorist are playing in Africa, look at the role the Jews are playing in Palestine, till these day many Americans continue to celebrate thanksgiving, an holiday that has been whitewashed to cover the atrocities of the puritans calling themselves the Pilgrims.

Like I said, it's impossible to defend these three religions with a working brain. The sad part is most Africans can't see it through all these charades.

While this is not a call to jettison or besmirch anyone's religious affiliation, however, we must ask certain questions.

Another observation, We all have our Muslim names and Christian names, in most cases, these names have nothing to do with our religious practices but the region it originates actually.

Take the name Muhammad for example, there were people bearing the name before the prophet (SAW), the name is more of an Arabic name than a Muslim name, the question here is why would Africans bear Arabic names while we aren't Arabs.
I quite understand if people call or name their sons after the prophet but the need for the rest of it is what I think is unnecessary.

As I have said earlier, this not limited to the Muslim, the most common "Christian" name is James, yet James is an English name. I'm sure you get the picture by now.

If Arabs aren't taking African's name, why should we take their names ?
The English aren't taking our names either why should we take their names.

You can still be a Muslim and not have an Arabic name, just as you can be a Christian and not have an English name.


I say this with all due respect, I think the people that came before us made a few mistakes and we must learn from that mistake.

Bigsam99:
Like I said earlier, the violence of the Palestinians is not the action, it is a reaction to their oppression by the Jews.

Exactly where you have no point. How can Palestinians say people can't claim their father's house just because they have been away despite the fact their remnants still remain. Violence is definitely bound to happen that way and the only solution is to divide it which they rejected. C'est finis.
If 50,000 of Kemi Badenoch come back to Nigeria, they will still claim their ancestral house or land as long as it was never legally sold to anyone else. Anyone occupying that land or house will have to vacate or better still, a division will occur. C'est finis.
Any other thing is simple gibberish which will only bring war.

@bigsam99
I thank you for your response and education on history, DNA evidence of Arabs and the europeans in palestine s your claims. I agree with you on anyone approving what is happening to the Arabs in Palestine is an extremist and is no different from boko haram and Isis.

My brother. Did you know the tribe that was living on the land of your father 2,000 years ago? What if their descendants came back and tell you to split your village in 2?

There was no reasonable need for Zionism except the urgent need to pacify the Jews by the western powers who had persecuted them for centuries. Why was Zionism championed from Europe and not from Palestine at that time? Why is it that it is the Ashkenazi Jews from Europe who are at the top of the Israeli society today, discriminating against blacks and Asian Jews?

I mentioned the story of the Bantu tribes, who migrated from present day South Eastern Nigeria around a thousand years ago, at a time not even up to how long the Hebrews have disappeared. Mind you, some people on the Mambilla Plateau still speak those languages in Nigeria. Imagine if the bantu tribes suddenly tell the Igbos and the middle beltans to split Igbo land and central Nigeria?

Gbadebo19:

Exactly where you have no point. How can Palestinians say people can't claim their father's house just because they have been away despite the fact their remnants still remain. Violence is definitely bound to happen that way and the only solution is to divide it which they rejected. C'est finis.
If 50,000 of Kemi Badenoch come back to Nigeria, they will still claim their ancestral house or land as long as it was never legally sold to anyone else. Anyone occupying that land or house will have to vacate or better still, a division will occur. C'est finis.
Any other thing is simple gibberish which will only bring war.

FoolishBoy419:
It amazes me that people are still arguing over these Abrahamic religions. They were all fabricated by egocentric, barbaric mass murderers to justify their tyranny. The Jews founded it to justify their mass murder of an indigenous population and take over their lands. The Christians used it to keep their population in darkness and to consolidate power. Islam was also founded to unify Arabia and take over surrounding territories.

Always nonsense and gibberish as usual.
Religion was fabricated - Accepted.
But that Jews used Judaism to conquer some "indigenous population" is arrant nonsense.
1. It is not from the Jewish religious books that we know that Judea was renamed to Palestine.
2. It is not from the Jewish religious books that we know that Emperor Hadrian did it.

The only thing we should be contesting is "whether or not the population of Judea as at the time it was renamed is of the recent Palestinians blood or of the initial Jews."

The larger percentage of the Palestinians population has always been semitic Arab. They also have a very very small percentage of semitic Jews.

Semites are a group of people linked by related language such as Arabic, Aramaic or Hebrew.

Whatever link the very very small percentage of even the semitic Jews have with the Jews is only a matter of language, which is Hebrew.

Using the above to determine the population of the Palestinians, it becomes much clearer that they were just a group of people without any distinct identity. And that gives further credence to why they never had a capital seat of istration nor any known currency. All that gibberish of "indigenous population" is arrant nonsense.

Bigsam99:
My brother. Did you know the tribe that was living on the land of your father 2,000 years ago? What if their descendants came back and tell you to split your village in 2?

You keep using irrelevant circumstances to justify your point. I do not know the tribe that was living on my father's land 2000 years ago. But if a minority of them remained, I lived with them on the same land, I was aware that my father didn't buy the land, it definitely still belongs to them. If I didn't live with them or didn't know them, I could make a claim that it is mine but that isn't the situation in Palestine and Israel.
Yes, understandably, 2000 years is a long time and I would fight to keep it. All these takes us back to why the partition was necessary.

FoolishBoy419:
It amazes me that people are still arguing over these Abrahamic religions. They were all fabricated by egocentric, barbaric mass murderers to justify their tyranny. The Jews founded it to justify their mass murder of an indigenous population and take over their lands. The Christians used it to keep their population in darkness and to consolidate power. Islam was also founded to unify Arabia and take over surrounding territories.

The thing is that while Christians eventually adopted a reformed, pussified watered down version of their faith after thousands had been burnt to death, crucified, stoned to death, and beheaded, a great chunk of Muslims insist on maintaining Muhammad's legacy of unwarranted violence and oppression against disbelievers. Muslims would tell you that their prophet fought for self-defense, but that's just lies. All 'peaceful and defensive verses'' in the Quran, most of which were 'revealed' in Mecca when Muhammad had no power, were subsequently abbrogated by the violent ones that came in Media. By Islamic law, anybody that doesn't believe in Allah is to be killed although Jews and Christians can be kept in humiliation and be made to pay taxes. Even with such a condition, Muhammad kicked 2 Jewish tribes out of Media and and got rid of the third one by beheading all their adult males (by adult, I mean those with pubic hair) and enslaving their women and children. Joshua and David did the same thing against innocent people.

I'm sorry if this offends you, but this is the painful truth. I am tired of these nonsensical religious arguments. This is not a one-sided thing. Muslims, Christians, and Jews have been taught that their blood is more precious than those of other mortals, so they struggle to recognize injustice unless they are at the receiving end.

Anybody that goes past the 20th century to justify Israel's actions is irrational and can best be described as a dumb religious extremist. What we are seeing in Palestine is a bunch of Jewish supremacists oppressing and terrorizing a defenceless population and we have 'intellectuals' here who think their morals are superior to those of Boko Haram justifying their actions.

💯💯💯
Wis I could like this a thousand times 😬

Bigsam99:

Why was Zionism championed from Europe and not from Palestine at that time?

Where else should it have been championed from? From the minority in Palestine? Give me a better argument pls.

Bigsam99:
Another difference was in the case of India and Pakistan, there were no immigrant Muslims or Hindus from Europe. Both populations are indigenous and had been living in that territory for centuries. The rapid built up of populations from Europe who are strangers as far as the Arabs are concerned, is the bone of contention. It is on record that more than 80% of the leaders demanding partition on the Jewish side were immigrants. Imagine how you would feel if that were to happen to your people.

Yes, they are demanding for it today because it is a second option in the absence of the best option. The Jews are undoubtedly stronger than them and there is nothing they can do about it. But you can't just expect them to shut up and do nothing about it.

Your issue is with the European Jews right?? that is a legitimate reason but it's not sufficient reason to downgrade the Jews right to a Jewish sovereign state.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR):
Article 13 of the UDHR explicitly states that everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state, and the right to leave any country, including their own, and to return to their country.

Immigration is and will always be part of human life, the Muslim Arabs you call the inhabitants of the lands weren't the original owners and were once strangers too.

There's is nothing wrong with European Jews moving to British mandate Palestine, It is within their right as far as the UN is concerned, They bought lands from Arabs and Jews alike and populated already established Jewish communities.

The question should be? did the Palestinian Jews a minority in the land welcomed them?? Yes they did and together both European Jews and Palestine jews fought for the creation of a sovereign Jewish state. If your entire argument for the illegitimacy of the creation of the Jewish state is based solely on immigration, then sadly it seriously doesn't hold water.

usmanpogo:


I wish I could like this statement multiple times, the intolerance preached by these three religions are unparalleled.

At some point we need to examine the adverse effect these religions have in our society, I gave up defending any of these religions because you can't do it without looking stupid.

At one point in history all these three religions was able to spread through committing genocide on a scale that has never been seen. The Jews have done it and are still doing it, the Christians did it through colonization, the Muslim did it during the Islamization of the middle east and Africa.

Look at the role Muslim terrorist are playing in Africa, look at the role the Jews are playing in Palestine, till these day many Americans continue to celebrate thanksgiving, an holiday that has been whitewashed to cover the atrocities of the puritans calling themselves the Pilgrims.

Like I said, it's impossible to defend these three religions with a working brain. The sad part is most Africans can't see it through all these charades.

While this is not a call to jettison or besmirch anyone's religious affiliation, however, we must ask certain questions.

Another observation, We all have our Muslim names and Christian names, in most cases, these names have nothing to do with our religious practices but the region it originates actually.

Take the name Muhammad for example, there were people bearing the name before the prophet (SAW), the name is more of an Arabic name than a Muslim name, the question here is why would Africans bear Arabic names while we aren't Arabs.
I quite understand if people call or name their sons after the prophet but the need for the rest of it is what I think is unnecessary.

As I have said earlier, this not limited to the Muslim, the most common "Christian" name is James, yet James is an English name. I'm sure you get the picture by now.

If Arabs aren't taking African's name, why should we take their names ?
The English aren't taking our names either why should we take their names.

You can still be a Muslim and not have an Arabic name, just as you can be a Christian and not have an English name.


I say this with all due respect, I think the people that came before us made a few mistakes and we must learn from that mistake.

Sadly, that change might never ever come. In my community, a Hausa name attracts nothing but ridicule from Hausas themselves. The other day, Kano banned 'Kauyawa day,' a lovely and harmless Hausa tradition because it promotes 'immorality.' and the vast majority of them the ban. We are conquered people 😞

Gbadebo19:

Always nonsense and gibberish as usual.
Religion was fabricated - Accepted.
But that Jews used Judaism to conquer some "indigenous population" is arrant nonsense.
1. It is not from the Jewish religious books that we know that Judea was renamed to Palestine.
2. It is not from the Jewish religious books that we know that Emperor Hadrian did it.

The only thing we should be contesting is "whether or not the population of Judea as at the time it was renamed is of the recent Palestinians blood or of the initial Jews."

The larger percentage of the Palestinians population has always been semitic Arab. They also have a very very small percentage of semitic Jews.

Semites are a group of people linked by related language such as Arabic, Aramaic or Hebrew.

Whatever link the very very small percentage of even the semitic Jews have with the Jews is only a matter of language, which is Hebrew.

Using the above to determine the population of the Palestinians, it becomes much clearer that they were just a group of people without any distinct identity. And that gives further credence to why they never had a capital seat of istration nor any known currency. All that gibberish of "indigenous population" is arrant nonsense.

He is still clinging onto events much older than the great grandparents of his great grandmas parents. I was merely talking about what's evident in the Jewish books. I don't care whether they're the same ones that lived there 2000 years ago or not. I just have a problem with supremacists placed in a land they don't belong and being ed by self-acclaimed moral people as they carry out what their religious books encourage them to do. You are a terrorist sympathizer. Just hours ago, you implied that moderate muslims are all terrorists in disguise. That means if given the power, you'd kill everyone of them.

Bigsam99:
Please forget about what the Arabs from other countries wanted. Since the dawn of history, mankind has been selfish and the greater part of the predicament stemmed from the treachery of their Arab brothers from neighbouring states. Both Egypt and Jordan wanted part of that Palestine from the onset, that is no news. I am talking about the demand of those who were residents of that land itself.

And please, Yes, Palestinian Arabs rejected the partition plan proposed in the 1940s. They opposed the very idea of partition and considered the plan unfair, particularly because it allocated a significant portion of the land to a Jewish state. Their rejection stemmed from a refusal to accept any form of partition, as their leaders did not recognize the legitimacy of such a division.

The Jews were only 30% of the population and they were given 55% of the land, including several areas that are ancestral lands to many Arabs and they will have to be displaced from their land which they had been for hundreds of years. resisting was the most natural thing to do.

Even if the UN offered 10% of the land to a Jewish state, Arabs would still have been right to reject it. The majority of the Jewish people living in Palestine were recent arrivals, who had been granted permission to settle in Palestine by a colonial power that lacked any legitimacy to allow such a thing to happen, and which was rejected by the local population which openly revolted against it. When you merely object to the proportions allocated to each state, you're implicitly giving legitimacy to the British colonial project.

It was a proposal by the UN it wasn't law binding, Did the Arabs asked for negotiations on the proposals or they decide to initiate a civil war with the intent of destroying Jewish communities, a round table discussions would have thrashed any form of discord arsing from the partition in respect to displacement and the holy sites claimed by both entity, but the Arabs knowing fully well that they had the numbers and a superior military decided to destroy the Jewish state.

Both sides had claims to the land, the Palestine jews although were the minority also had claims to the entire British mandate Palestine, Forget about the European Jews, the minority Palestinian Jews their ancestors once rule the entire f**king place and so they had authentic rights to the place.

Are you denying that Arab Jews don't have legitimate claims to Palestine? Or do they not have the right to a Jewish state if they so chooses?.

You said the British didn't have rights and lacked legitimacy, that's laughable, was the British the ancestral owners of Present day Nigeria, who carved out a country out of the vast land. the British, who gave you the name you currently bear the British. You become the legitimate ruler or authority by conquest either by force or by political means. How did the Jews once become the occupiers of the land? Wasn't it by conquest? How did the Ottoman Empire become the authority over Palestine? Wasn't it by conquest, the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in WW1 made the British empire the sole authority over Palestine, thus had legitimate rule over Palestine as backed by the League of Nations in 1922.

One of the reasons given by the Arab coalition w for the military intervention was that the British Mandate was over and there wasn't a recognised authority over Palestine, hence they intervened. here you are saying the British lacked legitimacy and authority over Palestine.

If present day Palestine are fighting and deserved a Palestine state, then the Jews also deserved a Jewish state in I947.

Allthelight:
jobless

A jobless person tracking a jobless man

FoolishBoy419:


He is still clinging onto events much older than the great grandparents of his great grandmas parents. I was merely talking about what's evident in the Jewish books. I don't care whether they're the same ones that lived there 2000 years ago or not. I just have a problem with supremacists placed in a land they don't belong and being ed by self-acclaimed moral people as they carry out what their religious books encourage them to do. You are a terrorist sympathizer. Just hours ago, you implied that moderate muslims are all terrorists in disguise. That means if given the power, you'd kill everyone of them.

Dindinrin. Alasey!!

usmanpogo:


I wish I could like this statement multiple times, the intolerance preached by these three religions are unparalleled.

At some point we need to examine the adverse effect these religions have in our society, I gave up defending any of these religions because you can't do it without looking stupid.

At one point in history all these three religions was able to spread through committing genocide on a scale that has never been seen. The Jews have done it and are still doing it, the Christians did it through colonization, the Muslim did it during the Islamization of the middle east and Africa.

Look at the role Muslim terrorist are playing in Africa, look at the role the Jews are playing in Palestine, till these day many Americans continue to celebrate thanksgiving, an holiday that has been whitewashed to cover the atrocities of the puritans calling themselves the Pilgrims.

Like I said, it's impossible to defend these three religions with a working brain. The sad part is most Africans can't see it through all these charades.

While this is not a call to jettison or besmirch anyone's religious affiliation, however, we must ask certain questions.

Another observation, We all have our Muslim names and Christian names, in most cases, these names have nothing to do with our religious practices but the region it originates actually.

Take the name Muhammad for example, there were people bearing the name before the prophet (SAW), the name is more of an Arabic name than a Muslim name, the question here is why would Africans bear Arabic names while we aren't Arabs.
I quite understand if people call or name their sons after the prophet but the need for the rest of it is what I think is unnecessary.

As I have said earlier, this not limited to the Muslim, the most common "Christian" name is James, yet James is an English name. I'm sure you get the picture by now.

If Arabs aren't taking African's name, why should we take their names ?
The English aren't taking our names either why should we take their names.

You can still be a Muslim and not have an Arabic name, just as you can be a Christian and not have an English name.


I say this with all due respect, I think the people that came before us made a few mistakes and we must learn from that mistake.

Religion has it advantages and disvantages, your ancestors were killing twins and committing human sacrifices before the Religion came, education came to African mostly through religion by missionaries, trade and development are all benefits of Religion.

Religion is not issue facing the Africa continent neither is it the names will bear, religious countries like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, are all doing fine and prospering, non religious countries like China is also prospering.

All things should be done in moderation including Religion.

Gbadebo19:

Dindinrin. Alasey!!

Kai Kasan wannan yaren 😂

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_Kokhba_revolt

All you need about The Bar Kokhba revolt which was the displacement of Jews in their own land.

Read the last line in the attached image and please tell me who the foreigners were if not some bastardized unrecognized people without an identity who are now claiming "indigenous population"

FoolishBoy419:


Sadly, that change might never ever come. In my community, a Hausa name attracts nothing but ridicule from Hausas themselves. The other day, Kano banned 'Kauyawa day,' a lovely and harmless Hausa tradition because it promotes 'immorality.' and the vast majority of them the ban. We are conquered people 😞

We are sadly the conquered race, we are at the bottom of the pile but I believe we can still savage what's left of our cultural dignity.
Mental enslavement is real, we have been defeated mentally to the point that we believe everything or anything that came from us is not worthy of preservation or celebration.

obedience4:


Religion has it advantages and disvantages, your ancestors were killing twins and committing human sacrifices before the Religion came, education came to African mostly through religion by missionaries, trade and development are all benefits of Religion.

Religion is not issue facing the Africa continent neither is it the names will bear, religious countries like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, are all doing fine and prospering, non religious countries like China is also prospering.

All things should be done in moderation including Religion.

While it's true there are some parts of South South Nigeria that killed twins. The SW Nigeria celebrates twins and think they are deities.
The puritans burned witches alive, same goes to the Catholics at some point, are you saying the same people that brought Christianity to Nigeria to educate us aren't educated themselves.

I can give you several instances that are similar to our condemnable act that you brought up, but what is evil is evil.

There's no way to go about it, the three religions have caused nothing but deaths and continues to do so.
Yes it has it advantages but it's disadvantages far outweighs it advantages at this point, especially on the African continent.

How convenient of you to mention Saudi Arabia, UAE and Kuwait, what about their neighboring countries ? Lol

usmanpogo:


While it's true there are some parts of South South Nigeria that killed twins. The SW Nigeria celebrates twins and think they are deities.
The puritans burned witches alive, same goes to the Catholics at some point, are you saying the same people that brought Christianity to Nigeria to educate us aren't educated themselves.

I can give you several instances that are similar to our condemnable act that you brought up, but what is evil is evil.

There's no way to go about it, the three religions have caused nothing but deaths and continues to do so.
Yes it has it advantages but it's disadvantages far outweighs it advantages at this point, especially on the African continent.

How convenient of you to mention Saudi Arabia, UAE and Kuwait, what about their neighboring countries ? Lol

All am trying to bring out is that Religion is not the pressing issue in of the problems faced by the Africa continent.

obedience4:



All am trying to bring out is that Religion is not the pressing issue in of the problems faced by the Africa continent.

Religion is the root cause of our insecurity in Africa, it's public knowledge, so many terror group, all have religious affiliations.

usmanpogo:


Religion is the root cause of our insecurity in Africa, it's public knowledge, so many terror group, all have religious affiliations.

True, but Religion alone is not the culprits, for me ethnicism is the real issue facing the state.

[i]Many Africa countries are not facing insurgency issues, they are still not developed[/].

obedience4:


True, but Religion alone is not the culprits, for me ethnicism is the real issue facing the state.

[i]Many Africa countries are not facing insurgency issues, they are still not developed[/].

On the contrary, we have been facing insurgencies for almost two decades in Nigeria. Perhaps you have another definition for insurgency.

It's a shame but it's the truth, almost all terror groups in Africa are Islamic d.

Are you certain you're from the same Nigeria we are talking about ? Because this your argument get as e be oo lol

usmanpogo:


On the contrary, we have been facing insurgencies for almost two decades in Nigeria. Perhaps you have another definition for insurgency.

It's a shame but it's the truth, almost all terror groups in Africa are Islamic d.

Are you certain you're from the same Nigeria we are talking about ? Because this your argument get as e be oo lol

I agreed with you 💯... Am just saying ethnicism is a bigger issue than Religion in Nigeria.

The destruction of lives and property during Nigeria years of insurgency can't be compared to the destruction caused by ethnicism which pludged the country into civil war.

Bigsam99:
SMH. Go back to your history books. The Jews were ruled by the Romans and it was the Romans under Titus that finally destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD. Islam and the great Arab conquest did not start until 5 centuries later. When Islam spread through conquest, there were several populations that were not originally Arabic but became Muslims. 2,000 years is an incredibly long time, longer than the existence of either Benin or Oyo empire, longer than the existence of Yoruba or Igbo as ethnic groups. Why is anybody holding on to something from 2,000 years ago. It is just simple brainwashing and you lot keep falling for it. Enjoy it.

brother calm down, you are the one bending history to your narrative


The land belong to the Jews maybe by conquest, history or whatever way

⚡Israel and Hamas have agreed to begin a ceasefire within hours.

WritterNg:
⚡Israel and Hamas have agreed to begin a ceasefire within hours.

If Hamas have been completely destroyed, according to some bozos here..... Who is Israel negotiating ceasefires with then??



🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🇮🇱 🇺🇸 🇪🇺 🇬🇧 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡

⚡The Russian delegation for the second round of talks in Istanbul will remain the same: Maria Zakharova