NewStats: 3,264,044 , 8,182,407 topics. Date: Monday, 09 June 2025 at 12:18 PM 1w4t3w

lawani:


It is in the Ifa corpus. In Ofun meji
We start where we end
Was the Ifa divination for the new born who knew nothing at the beginning of his life. He was advised to be honest and do the right thing always and he would be ed by Olodumare
He listened to the ritual items and complied.

At the end of his life the newborn who knew nothing had become the old man who knew much and he lived his life ed by his Ori and by Olodumarw and upon his death he returned to Orun to become one of the innumerable irunmales that would again be reincarnated as the newborn who knows nothing.

Thus is how we continue the cycle of reincarnation until we reach the state of Apeere the state of perfection

ASE

Send a link to the ifa corpus.

KnownUnknown:


Oh, no doubt about that.

Exactly!

KnownUnknown:


Is this new knowledge to you?
Why would you write that as if she doesn’t know?



What?

It’s not that deep.

1Sharon:


Because there is some truth to that statement.

And hope you know that a Sango, ogun and yahweh worshipper are all THEIST.
The problem is with people that don’t worship any of these deities, an athiest?

If only they know that yahweh their god, is one and same with head of satans.

lawani:


You yourself before being incarnated you were an irunmale like Olodumare but your status would be lower. However the main difference between you and Olodumare is that you are being incarnated while Olodumare will never be. Olodumare in council know the end from the beginning while you are free to make your own plans in-between which changes nothing from Olodumare's overall plan. Can the conduct of one errant or hardworking staff change the overall result that the management of a corporation will get?

False, show me where you pulling this from? Hope it’s not from your ass?

43Ronin:

3rd centrury

BC or AD?
What’s the name of the tibet monk in 3rd century? Did he come to Nazareth? Or jesus went to tibet?

43Ronin:


Yeshua not Jesus, used the Jesus christ to draw you in to understand what you meant by Jesus christ being fake. But I get your point nau. The sage is a Tibet monk.
Yeah I have heard its the original/oldest new testament scripts but I haven't come in with the original manuscript especially as I cannot speak greek

What century was this tibet monk?

43Ronin:


Ok

Who are the sages that taught “jesus christ”?
Heard of codex sinaitcus before?

43Ronin:


Are u denying that you haven't said that Jesus christ is a not real but a roman creation? I u having this argument where you were told that it's just translation corruption from yeshua to greek iesus to latin. Jesus’ name in English comes from the Latin Isus, which is a transliteration of the Greek Iesous, which is a transliteration of the Aramaic name Yeshua, which comes from the Hebrew Yehoshua, or Joshua.

Yeshua is different from “Jesus Christ”. Yeshua is mentioned in the tanakh.
Jesus Chrestus which was later changed to Jesus Christ is a creation of roman empire.
Yeah they are TRANSLITERATION not TRANSLATION.

43Ronin:

Good so why do you now say yeshua/yehoshua hamashiac is fake

Where did i say they are fake?
You are small

43Ronin:


But it was you who said Jesus is a common latin name nau. Lol. That means you are the oderinde

Yes it’s a common latin name, finding it hard to comprehend?
Oponu

43Ronin:

What is the meaning of Jesus since it was a common Latin name? Let's start from. Just so you know, I could have said Joshua or Yashua the nazarene, or yashua the essene but I used Jesus christ to get your attention. Now what is the meaning of Jesus christ according to Latin?

Its yeshua not “yashua”. The English translation of yeshua is Joshua. “Jesus” is a English transliteration of yeshau, the correct spelling in latin is “iesus”, the early church father had to replace I with j.
New testament was written in greek, why does a Latin name appear in it?
Christ is a greek word derived from hebrew, it’s not a latin word, olodo.
There’s nothing like Jesus Christ, you mean Jesus Chrestus?

43Ronin:


Answer my question first, is Jesus Christ a name or a title? What is the meaning of Jesus Christ?

Jesus is a common latin name for male
Christ(messiah) is a title which means anointed.

Who are the sages that taught “jesus christ”?

43Ronin:

Lol. This guy nothing wey u sabi o. Is Jesus christ a name or a title? What is the meaning of Jesus Christ?

But you dummy sabi “jesus christ”.
Jesus is a common latin name for male
Christ(messiah) is a title which means anointed. Many niggas in Old Testament are messiah.
Tell me more about this “jesus christ”

43Ronin:


All these things u posted are already known. The original of yahwe, his parents & siblings and how he was worshipped by the canaanites long before the israelites adopted him as their national god,Its like esoteric 101. You do not have any superior knowledge if what you bring to the table is already known. Stop talking about ancient folklore. Talk about how man was made, who made man and for what purpose. Are beings like Yahweh truly gods or just ETs from another planet? That is what's up. My point being anyone who doesn't know about yahwe being crested should not even be in this tread in the first place. Let OP proceed kets know where he's going

tell me more about the sages that thought “jesus christ”?

43Ronin:


The funny thing is that I am not even a yahwe worshipper. I know what you know and even more but you don't see me here being a nuisance. The OP using the bible was as a means of referencing which all scholars do. I don't think you atended higher institution because if you did you would understand what it means to use references from various sources for comparative analogy and thus quote the author. It doesn't matter where yahwe the israelite god is from, as long as the bible has been authorised to be used as literary work, OP has every right to use. Those who have come to esoteric gnosis are usually humbled by it, u dont see them braging or being a nuisance. What will you now do if you read scrolls of 1AD, or come in with the sages especially the ones who trained jesus the christ? Ordinary wikipedia editable knowledge we will not hear word. I don't follow you on every tread. I only notice your stupidity on most religious tread. The next time you try to derail the thread you will be banned. This is my last response to you.

Illiterate it seems Jesus Christ is different from Jesus of Nazareth.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazarene_(title)

43Ronin:


The funny thing is that I am not even a yahwe worshipper. I know what you know and even more but you don't see me here being a nuisance. The OP using the bible was as a means of referencing which all scholars do. I don't think you atended higher institution because if you did you would understand what it means to use references from various sources for comparative analogy and thus quote the author. It doesn't matter where yahwe the israelite god is from, as long as the bible has been authorised to be used as literary work, OP has every right to use. Those who have come to esoteric gnosis are usually humbled by it, u dont see them braging or being a nuisance. What will you now do if you read scrolls of 1AD, or come in with the sages especially the ones who trained jesus the christ? Ordinary wikipedia editable knowledge we will not hear word. I don't follow you on every tread. I only notice your stupidity on most religious tread. The next time you try to derail the thread you will be banned. This is my last response to you.

Did the sages train “is chrest” too? Or just jesus Chrestus?

43Ronin:


The funny thing is that I am not even a yahwe worshipper. I know what you know and even more but you don't see me here being a nuisance. The OP using the bible was as a means of referencing which all scholars do. I don't think you atended higher institution because if you did you would understand what it means to use references from various sources for comparative analogy and thus quote the author. It doesn't matter where yahwe the israelite god is from, as long as the bible has been authorised to be used as literary work, OP has every right to use. Those who have come to esoteric gnosis are usually humbled by it, u dont see them braging or being a nuisance. What will you now do if you read scrolls of 1AD, or come in with the sages especially the ones who trained jesus the christ? Ordinary wikipedia editable knowledge we will not hear word. I don't follow you on every tread. I only notice your stupidity on most religious tread. The next time you try to derail the thread you will be banned. This is my last response to you.

Esoteric gnosis kee you there

43Ronin:


The funny thing is that I am not even a yahwe worshipper. I know what you know and even more but you don't see me here being a nuisance. The OP using the bible was as a means of referencing which all scholars do. I don't think you atended higher institution because if you did you would understand what it means to use references from various sources for comparative analogy and thus quote the author. It doesn't matter where yahwe the israelite god is from, as long as the bible has been authorised to be used as literary work, OP has every right to use. Those who have come to esoteric gnosis are usually humbled by it, u dont see them braging or being a nuisance. What will you now do if you read scrolls of 1AD, or come in with the sages especially the ones who trained jesus the christ? Ordinary wikipedia editable knowledge we will not hear word. I don't follow you on every tread. I only notice your stupidity on most religious tread. The next time you try to derail the thread you will be banned. This is my last response to you.

Dullard who said Op can’t use the tanakh and Christian book?

Who is Yahweh of shasu tribe
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shasu