NewStats: 3,263,866 , 8,181,655 topics. Date: Sunday, 08 June 2025 at 11:30 AM 736i4w

var jxt de favor mutd any how

TheGoodJoe:


I doubt you understand what active play is.

Is he part of the game. ing, crossing, defending?

Not at all. He was not part of the play in any way.


That was pure robbery.

He was not part of the game but he was able to move is leg

See dis

nwodopetre:
var jxt de favor mutd any how

This guy finally smiles as VAR rules the goal offside.

Dantedasz:


I did not write the 17 rules please. It is sad that football fans and even players watch and play this game and yet do NOT know or even understand the rules governing the game.
This is my last response to all these mentions.
1. Sigurdsson the player on the floor was offside when that ball was played and was guilty of contravention of the first rule of the offside law.
2. By moving his legs out of the trajectory of the ball he interfered with play and gained an advantage and thus contravened rule 2 of the offside law.
It is not rocket science, it is comprehension and interpretation of the offside law.
Please goggle it!

I still disagree with you.The rule u r stating r all correct.But ur interpretations and de application of de rules today by de officials are all wrong.In 2012 season,west broom scored a beautiful goal against Man City but was ruled out for offside.We then asked why cos the ball didn't touch anybody on offside position.The analyst then dig into FIFA archive n brot out de offside rules n vivid explanation was offered.In dat case,de player was seen clearly covering de goalkeeper view.Various oda interpretations wer equally offered by officials of football governing body.And as much as I can ,non of dem included lying down in floor n withdrawing leg from .Mind u de player wasn't standing erect which we wud av said dere was interference.Secondly, withdrawing de leg did not change the direction of the ball nor help in anyway to confuse the keeper.Or u av never seen on many occasions wer during free-kick taking some players will intentionally stay in offside position n dodge de ball by running across de ball or standing stilt till the ball n enter goal n referee counted it as goal on de ground dat he didn't touch de ball.So is dat one not more deceptive dan withdrawal of legs from ball?

BabaO2:
Dem wan package 4th position for ManU, shameless people.

I tell you bro!!

beejay501:

Guy which match did you watched?

The same match you believe I’m talking about... Apparently Lindelof was just too soft against Everton, his build up play from the back makes no sense... while Mc... is yet to return to his very Best... My Opinion

After all that England FA does for them, they still won't make top 4

Glycosunde:

I hope u know that if that goal had stood it would have been an own goal against maguire. So tell me how does a potential own goal is now ruled out as offside.

No. a defection changing the direction of the ball total from an opponent will be awarded own goal but a deflection that does not really change the direction of the ball is awarded to the striker of the ball.

Pacesetter123:
I still disagree with you.The rule u r stating r all correct.But ur interpretations and de application of de rules today by de officials are all wrong.In 2012 season,west broom scored a beautiful goal against Man City but was ruled out for offside.We then asked why cos the ball didn't touch anybody on offside position.The analyst then dig into FIFA archive n brot out de offside rules n vivid explanation was offered.In dat case,de player was seen clearly covering de goalkeeper view.Various oda interpretations wer equally offered by officials of football governing body.And as much as I can ,non of dem included lying down in floor n withdrawing leg from .Mind u de player wasn't standing erect which we wud av said dere was interference.Secondly, withdrawing de leg did not change the direction of the ball nor help in anyway to confuse the keeper.Or u av never seen on many occasions wer during free-kick taking some players will intentionally stay in offside position n dodge de ball by running across de ball or standing stilt till the ball n enter goal n referee counted it as goal on de ground dat he didn't touch de ball.So is dat one not more deceptive dan withdrawal of legs from ball?

sir its offside he was on the post line close to the goalkeeper, thereby obstructing the movement of the goalie.

Dantedasz:


He played in the Europa league on Thursday as a second half sub. He assisted Fred's second goal in the 5-0 defeat of Brugge.

The only GOAT I stan

Dantedasz:


The movement of both legs brings him into active play!
Please understand the rules.

Hmmm.... But the match ended and everyone is happy. At leasr no CoronaVirus infection reported at the stadium.

Intending land and house buyers should get get in touch with us (Duplex or Apartment houses). Verified and government certified titled LAND or houses. Check here and our signature below.
https://nairaland.macsoftware.info/5643825/dont-miss-best-ibeju-lekki-deal

masterflowx:


But e no go pain you reach me. I no eat yesterday night.
YNWA!!!

loser. e pain am die. u just dey start

masterflowx:

Omo see broda, broda
Broda wey mumu, broda
Broda wey no wise, broda...

and u dey report person wey say mumu comment.
hahahahahahahahahahaha u go hear am.
u fit call other mumu, bt u no fit accept am.
hahahahahahahahahahaha. ant wey dey do like cockroach

masterflowx:

Cc
Lalasticlala
Mynd44
Seun
Oam4j
Dominique

Rule 2 broken!

supernigga:
sir its offside he was on the post line close to the goalkeeper, thereby obstructing the movement of the goalie.

Ok...ooo, let us leave it like dat.After all,our argument here can't reverse the decision of de referee.Lets focus on future events n leave the past behind us.Cheers!!

Justinlean02:
He gets what he deserves for staying loyal when in the form of his life saving your Man UTD asses instead of jumping ship to Madrid. De Gea deserves some respect from you lots that can't even kick nothing

I have a six weeks old phone i want to sell. I bought it new. It comes with receipt.

I am willing to give my powerbank with it if you buy my phone. I am trying to raise funds to fund my projects. Come and buy.

It's a Techno Camon 12

3GB RAM

32GB ROM

It's neat. Covered front and back so no scratch or issues. 100% neat


The carton still is still intact


Can we chat on WhatsApp?