NewStats: 3,265,243 , 8,186,109 topics. Date: Saturday, 14 June 2025 at 03:48 AM 346gk

Gbadebo19:

Haha, why are you crying so profusely?
Just a few hours ago, you said you can't lose sleep over today's events. These writings resemble someone in deep anguish 😧

So you mean I've been in deep anguish for 3 years now??

Because this have always been my stance from day one. I've said it more than a thousand times, even when Russia took more territories.

Calm down

Floky215:


Attacking nato would be suicide and putin himself knows this..
Ah beg no push putin enter one chance...Ukraine is enough headache for him as it stands now...

What exactly would NATO do that they haven't already done? Apart from Nukes what else is left for them?

Can NATO match Russia firepower? In today's world, missiles and drones rule the skies, as this last attack has shown.

If they hit Russia's strategic aviation, Russia hit theirs... It's fair game.

⚡Russian sources claim geolocation shows Ukrainian FPV drones used in the airbase attacks were assembled inside a rented warehouse at 28A Sverdlovsky Trakt, Chelyabinsk, Russia.

The claimed facility lies just near the Kazakhstan border, possibly a supply route for components.

⚡1 Iskander-M ballistic missile impacted the vicinity of Lozova, Kharkiv Oblast. We will probably get footage soon.

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMShNknpQ/

Looting and riot in two dead

DystopianMuse:
DECAGONE
HEPTAGONE
PENTAGONE
STRATEGIC BOMBERS GONE😂😂😂😂

HOW YHE FVCK WILL RUSSIA REPLACE THOSE PLANES. 40 PLANES...AAH!!!

you do realize that's its not 40 planes but about 12...and yea they have about 150 of them

Floky215:


Attacking nato would be suicide and putin himself knows this..
Ah beg no push putin enter one chance...Ukraine is enough headache for him as it stands now...

Attacking NATO changes nothing. If the case was reversed, NATO would have attacked Russia. Russia just doesn't need to launch such attack openly.

So, it should use some kind of third party to launch its attacks. And even if it does it itself, it shouldn't acknowledge it. Everyone will know Russia did it. But Russia won't openly accept that they did it. But everyone will know they did it.

Playing with Fire
Ukraine’s Operation Spiderweb has crossed the threshold when it comes to triggering a Russian nuclear response. How Russia and the United States respond could determine the fate of the world.
Scott Ritter
In 2012, Russian President Vladimir Putin declared that “The nuclear weapons remain the most important guarantee of Russia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and play a key role in maintaining the regional balance and stability.”

In the intervening years, western analysts and observers have accused Russia and its leadership of irresponsibly invoking the threat of nuclear weapons as a means of “saber rattling”—a strategic bluff to hide operational and tactical shortfalls in Russian military capabilities.

In 2020 Russia published, for the first time, an unclassified version of its nuclear doctrine. The document, called “Basic Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence,” noted that Russia “reserves the right to use nuclear weapons” when Moscow is acting “in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and/or its allies, as well as in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is in jeopardy.” The document also stated that Russia reserved the right to use nuclear weapons in case of an “attack by [an] adversary against critical governmental or military sites of the Russian Federation, disruption of which would undermine nuclear forces response actions.”

In 2024 Vladimir Putin ordered Russia’s nuclear doctrine to be updated to consider the complicated geopolitical realities that had emerged from the ongoing Special Military Operation (SMO) in Ukraine, where the conflict had morphed into a proxy war between the collective west (NATO and the US) and Russia.

The new doctrine declared that nuclear weapons would be authorized for use in case of an “aggression against the Russian Federation and (or) its allies by any non-nuclear state with the participation or of a nuclear state is considered as their t attack.”

Read more from the article


https://scottritter.substack.com/p/playing-with-fire

shoodboi2:


Attacking NATO changes nothing. If the case was reversed, NATO would have attacked Russia. Russia just doesn't need to launch such attack openly.

So, it should use some kind of third party to launch its attacks. And even if it does it itself, it shouldn't acknowledge it. Everyone will know Russia did it. But Russia won't openly accept that they did it. But everyone will know they did it.

Exactly.

Too me i feel this plane attack was rushed it wasn't supposed to happen today but they did it to make people forget about the train terrorist attack...

Ukraine could have done this another day and an irrational escalation from Russia is not necessary. They lose guard and it cost them, it's more important to continue the front lines advancement until Ukraine lines will collapse but the war wil only be costly for Russia if sabotages like this continues to happen.

Why do I feel like Ukraine originally planned to launch this drone strike on the Red Square during the Russian Victory day on May 9? It's likely why Zelensky was all boastful and arrogant during that period until the US likely talked him out of it.

The new doctrine declared that nuclear weapons would be authorized for use in case of an “aggression against the Russian Federation and (or) its allies by any non-nuclear state with the participation or of a nuclear state is considered as their t attack.”

Russia’s nuclear arsenal would also come into play in the event of “actions by an adversary affecting elements of critically important state or military infrastructure of the Russian Federation, the disablement of which would disrupt response actions by nuclear forces.”

shoodboi2:


Attacking NATO changes nothing. If the case was reversed, NATO would have attacked Russia. Russia just doesn't need to launch such attack openly.

So, it should use some kind of third party to launch its attacks. And even if it does it itself, it shouldn't acknowledge it. Everyone will know Russia did it. But Russia won't openly accept that they did it. But everyone will know they did it.

Russia has been doing it but it's on a lower level

WritterNg:


6, not even 12.

If Putin downplays this attack, then one day he'll wake up to Ukrainian drones flying over his head.

There comes a point when one says enough is enough.

Ukrainian lives are worthless, at least to NATO. Russia should use them to set an example.

The point is if Putin didn't escalate during biden he just cant do it now.

dvkot:
Russia has been doing it but it's on a lower level

lolz

Well Putin was playing with fire

⚡Ukraine's SBU:

34% of strategic carriers of cruise missiles at the main airfields of the Russian Federation have been hit.

$7 billion is the estimated cost of Russia's strategic aviation, which was bombed today as a result of the SBU's special operation.

WritterNg:
⚡Ukraine's SBU:

34% of strategic carriers of cruise missiles at the main airfields of the Russian Federation have been hit.

$7 billion is the estimated cost of Russia's strategic aviation, which was bombed today as a result of the SBU's special operation.

Now that's what we call strategic strike and done with 50$ drones and not just shooting islander missile worth millions of dollars like mad man into civilian homes....

WritterNg:
⚡Ukraine's SBU:

34% of strategic carriers of cruise missiles at the main airfields of the Russian Federation have been hit.

$7 billion is the estimated cost of Russia's strategic aviation, which was bombed today as a result of the SBU's special operation.

Now, that's the proper definition of Special Military Operation.

Dvdpity:
If Russia do not declare war on Ukraine now... Putin will blame himself for his execution by Russians.

What nonsense.

propagandist

Iconic photo of the day.🤣🤣
When will Pootin draw the next red line, Zelensky wants to cross. 🤣🤣🤣

Floky215:


Now that's what we call strategic strike and done with 50$ drones and not just shooting islander missile worth millions of dollars like mad man into civilian homes....

😆

Floky215:


Now that's what we call strategic strike and done with 50$ drones and not just shooting islander missile worth millions of dollars like mad man into civilian homes....

So if you were Russia, you'd wait 1.8 years to destroy 6 bombers and 2 bridges?

You know the amount of Ukrainian military assets Russia has destroyed in 6 months alone?

The operation took nearly 2 years to execute and was done inside Russia. It wasn't as sophisticated as you'll like it to be.

WritterNg:


So if you were Russia, you'd wait 1.8 years to destroy 6 bombers and 2 bridges?

You know the amount of Ukrainian military assets Russia has destroyed in 6 months alone?

The operation took nearly 2 years to execute and was done inside Russia. It wasn't as sophisticated as you'll like it to be.

It was a sophisticated one.

Imagine if this could happened so easily like that inside Russia territory, there is high tendency that there are other attack strategy that Ukraine probably have in place and can execute at any time.

Russia would be foolish to think today's attack is the end of what Ukraine have up their sleeves.

They may have 10 others of similar unexpected plans that can totally destroy all the major power of Russia.

If anything, this attack shows that Russia is in major trouble. They aren't as invincible as expected and probably should watch out for more attacks

⚡Zelensky on the Ukrainian operation in Russia:

An absolutely brilliant result. An independent result of Ukraine. A year, six months and nine days from the start of planning to effective implementation. Our operation is the most far-reaching. Our people who prepared the operation were withdrawn from Russian territory on time.

We cannot tell everything now, but these are Ukrainian actions that will definitely be in history textbooks.

Ukraine is defending itself, and quite rightly so – we are doing everything to make Russia feel the need to end this war. Russia started this war, Russia must end it. Glory to Ukraine!

⚡Zelensky:

The "office" of our operation in Russia was located directly next to the FSB headquarters in one of their regions.

WritterNg:


So if you were Russia, you'd wait 1.8 years to destroy 6 bombers and 2 bridges?

You know the amount of Ukrainian military assets Russia has destroyed in 6 months alone?

The operation took nearly 2 years to execute and was done inside Russia. It wasn't as sophisticated as you'll like it to be.

I don't comment regularly boss, but lemme drop this. Sometimes you need to know when to shut it. I saying something here late last year that what you fear most is what happens mostly. Putin have enacted several red lines which Ukraine have shattered. That's an act of weakness no more strength.

If it was to be during the soviet era putin would be long over thrown. To tell you how bad this is, China will soon or if not already start aligning with the west because if you can't beat them you them.

Everyone wants a strong ally and at this point Russia is not in that caliber at the moment. IT'S BETTER FOR A LEADER TO BE FEARED THAT TO BE LOVED. Russia is overstretched right now and i can tell you this expect more destruction in Russia.