NewStats: 3,263,762 , 8,181,318 topics. Date: Saturday, 07 June 2025 at 07:24 PM 46595s

Kobojunkieee:
Taught by whom to whom?

2. ed down orally from what people's generation?

You mean you are not aware that for centuries there was no written bible?
This the simple reality, no one is capable of understanding reality beyond their degree of qualitative development.

BibleInterpreta:
➜ You mean you are not aware that for centuries there was no written bible?
➜This the simple reality, no one is capable of understanding reality beyond their degree of qualitative development.

You mean Moses never wrote down the Law when he was commanded to write it down by YHWH of Israel? And where the records say that the book of the Law was read to the people, beginning in the time of Moses, it was all a lie?

2. Reality according to whom? You?

Kobojunkieee:
You mean Moses never wrote down the Law when he was commanded to write it down by YHWH of Israel? And where the records say that the book of the Law was read to the people, beginning in the time of Moses, it was all a lie?

2. Reality according to whom? You?

Are you not aware that before Moses, the core spiritual principle of the Bible, 'Love your neighbor as yourself,' was taught as far back as 5,785 years ago?
It was ed down orally from generation to generation.
This the simple reality, you cannot understand reality beyond your degree of qualitative development - Einstein's theory of relativity.

BibleInterpreta:
➜Are you not aware that before Moses, the core spiritual principle of the Bible, 'Love your neighbor as yourself,' was taught as far back as 5,785 years ago?
➜It was ed down orally from generation to generation.
➜This the simple reality, you cannot understand reality beyond your degree of qualitative development [/b]- Einstein's theory of relativity.

1. Again, taught by whom, to whom?

2. ed down orally from what people's generation?

3. If one rejects the content of human texts as written by humans in human languages, how can one boast of understanding reality, let alone pretend understanding of that which may lie beyond reality?

Kobojunkieee:
1. Again, taught by whom, to whom?

2. ed down orally from what people's generation?

3. If one rejects the content of human texts as written by humans in human languages, how can one boast of understanding reality, let alone pretend understanding of that which may lie beyond reality?

I am genuinely shocked that you unaware that before Moses, the core spiritual principle of the Bible, 'Love your neighbor as yourself,' was taught as far back as 5,785 years ago?
And that It was ed down orally from generation to generation?
Scientifically speaking, you cannot understand reality beyond your degree of qualitative development - Einstein's theory of relativity.

BibleInterpreta:
1. I am genuinely shocked that you unaware that before Moses, the core spiritual principle of the Bible, 'Love your neighbor as yourself,' was taught as far back as 5,785 years ago?
➜And that It was ed down orally from generation to generation?
➜Scientifically speaking, you cannot understand reality beyond your degree of qualitative development - Einstein's theory of relativity.

1. OK.... I don't know anything that happened 5,785 years ago. So, you claim it was taught by whom, to whom?

2. It was ed down orally from what culture's generation to the other?

3. If one rejects the content of human texts as written by humans in human languages, how can one boast of understanding reality, let alone pretend understanding of that which may lie beyond reality?

Kobojunkie:
1. OK.... I don't know anything that happened 5,785 years ago. So, you claim it was taught by whom, to whom?

2. It was ed down orally from what culture's generation to the other?

3. If one rejects the content of human texts as written by humans in human languages, how can one boast of understanding reality, let alone pretend understanding of that which may lie beyond reality?

Would you say that science and the Bible agree on the nature of reality?

BibleInterpreta:
➜Would you say that science and the Bible agree on the nature of reality?

⚉ Are those claims you made earlier false?
⚉ Is that why you have been unable to answer any of the questions I have asked up to this point regarding them?
⚉ Why are you bringing science into this when you have not even been able to respond to the basic questions regarding the Bible, which you continue to make uned claims about?

Kobojunkie:
⚉ Are those claims you made earlier false?
⚉ Is that why you have been unable to answer any of the questions I have asked up to this point regarding them?
⚉ Why are you bringing science into this when you have not even been able to respond to the basic questions regarding the Bible, which you continue to make uned claims about?

You are unaware that before Moses, the core spiritual principle of the Bible, 'Love your neighbor as yourself,' was taught as far back as 5,785 years ago. And that It was ed down orally from generation to generation - These are the very basics.
If these basics are not clear to you, that is where you need to start before attempting the degree of knowledge you are evidently yet to attain.
, you cannot comprehend reality beyond the degree of your qualitative development - Einstein's theory of relativity.

BibleInterpreta:
➜You are unaware that before Moses, the core spiritual principle of the Bible, 'Love your neighbor as yourself,' was taught as far back as 5,785 years ago. And that It was ed down orally from generation to generation - These are the very basics.
➜If these basics are not clear to you, that is where you need to start before attempting the degree of knowledge you are evidently yet to attain.
, you cannot comprehend reality beyond the degree of your qualitative development - Einstein's theory of relativity.

1. The basics that you proclaim are according to what text, given that these ideas are not expressed in any of the books of Israelite origin?

2. I have been asking you question after question up to this point to ascertain where these basics of yours come from, but you have refused to provide any answers or details. Why is that?

Guy, all this big big stomach churning grammar that you are blowing serves no end, no one has the time to try and read what is in your mind or what you want to say. Do yourself a favour and communicate clearly and lucidly

All this love that you people are talking about, you will see the true love when Jesus Christ returns and crushes all these edifice of lies that you all have built and are part of.

Luke 19:27
But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

We shall hear what your fathers will say and plead when this commandment goes out against them

BibleInterpreta:

It is the force of unity that emerges not from human hands, not from egoistic calculations, but from the correction of the ego with the intention of love. This force will shatter the illusion of the egoistic world, revealing the truth that only through connection, mutual responsibility, and attaining love of others in the intention can we build a lasting structure — the spiritual edifice of a corrected humanity.
The question is, are we ready to see it, or will we cling to the collapsing tower of ego until it crumbles beneath us?

BibleInterpreta:

If you understand Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, then you will grasp my statement: "No one is capable of understanding reality beyond their degree of qualitative development."
In addition, there is no contradiction between the bible and the scientific s of reality. Each offers insights into different dimensions of reality, the spiritual and the physical, and together they provide a more comprehensive understanding of our reality.
Here is a good example 👉https://nairaland.macsoftware.info/8428941/q-genesis-creation--contradicts

Lol making claims is quite easy, anyone can say any crap, demonstrating claims on the other hand is something i could bet a thousand dollars you couldn't do for any of the claims u've made so far ergo the beating around the bush and tangents. As for your Einstien fluff, its nonsense, it's a rubbish claim like i already said and like i also said I bet a thousand dollars you couldn't demonstrate if your life depended on it.

Empty claims is all, it's why the claims are never taken seriously in reality, that's aside from the hilarious fact that those who even believe these claims can't come to any objective conclusion. Same with your no contradiction between the bible and scientific s. Sometimes i don't know if you guys are been facetious or just outright delusional.

Anyway humor me, how did the sun stand still, demonstrate how the sun stood still since no contradiction btw science and your texts. Tick tock! There's 3 outcomes as regards your response and it's the same outcome everytime with u guys, so tick tock. 😌

Lucifyre:


Lol making claims is quite easy, anyone can say any crap, demonstrating claims on the other hand is something i could bet a thousand dollars you couldn't do for any of the claims u've made so far ergo the beating around the bush and tangents. As for your Einstien fluff, its nonsense, it's a rubbish claim like i already said and like i also said I bet a thousand dollars you couldn't demonstrate if your life depended on it.

Empty claims is all, it's why the claims are never taken seriously in reality, that's aside from the hilarious fact that those who even believe these claims can't come to any objective conclusion. Same with your no contradiction between the bible and scientific s. Sometimes i don't know if you guys are been facetious or just outright delusional.

Anyway humor me, how did the sun stand still, demonstrate how the sun stood still since no contradiction btw science and your texts. Tick tock! There's 3 outcomes as regards your response and it's the same outcome everytime with u guys, so tick tock. 😌

1. On the Ease of Making Claims vs. Demonstrating Them
"Lol making claims is quite easy, anyone can say any crap..."

Yes, anyone can make claims, we live in a world filled with voices, opinions, and egoistic noise. But bible Interpretation is not about claiming or debating for intellectual sport. It is about personal transformation and attainment. Demonstration, in our method, means internal experience through corrected perception, not performance for entertainment.

2. On the Einstein Theory of Relativity Being "Rubbish"
"...your Einstein theory of relativity, its nonsense..."

Whether you accept it or not, Einstein’s theory, like quantum mechanics, shattered the illusion of a deterministic, mechanical universe. It introduced relativity, uncertainty, and the impact of the observer. These are all ideas bible Interpretation has addressed for millennia; that the observer’s degree of qualitative development defines the reality he perceives. Science is slowly approaching this: reality is subjective, and rooted in perception.

You dismiss relativity as “nonsense” and challenge me to demonstrate it. Einstein’s theory (special and general relativity) is a cornerstone of modern physics, experimentally validated through:
• GPS Systems: Clocks on satellites tick slightly faster than on Earth due to weaker gravity, as predicted by general relativity.
• Gravitational Lensing: Light from distant stars bends around massive objects like the sun, observed during solar eclipses (e.g., Eddington’s 1919 experiment).
• Time Dilation: Particle accelerators show that fast-moving particles (e.g., muons) decay more slowly, aligning with special relativity’s predictions.
I can’t personally replicate these experiments in a conversation, but they’re well-documented in peer-reviewed literature. If you reject relativity outright, could you clarify which aspect you find implausible?

3. On the Alleged Contradiction Between the Bible and Science
"...no contradiction between the bible and scientific s..."

There is no contradiction because the bible speaks in the language of the branches, not physical history. The Bible is not a science textbook. It is encoded in the language of the branches, describing spiritual states. Science studies the material branch, while bible decodes the spiritual root. Without this lens, yes, the stories seem mythological. But through attaining appropriate perception, they are deep spiritual truths.

4. On the “Sun Standing Still”
"...how did the sun stand still... demonstrate how..."

When the Book of Joshua says the sun stood still, it's not discussing astrophysics. The “sun” in bible symbolizes the ego’s governing force or illumination. “Standing still” represents a halting of spiritual concealment — allowing for inner work of correction of the ego to take place. This event occurred not in the sky, but in the inner world of the soul. You cannot “demonstrate” that with corporeal instruments, only attain it within through spiritual development.

5. On Objectivity and the “Three Outcomes”
"...there's 3 outcomes as regards your response..."

You're expecting a response that fits one of your predetermined categories: dodge, faith-talk, or pseudo-science. I offer none. I invite experience, the only honest test. bible Interpretation is not a belief system. It’s a methodology. If you want objectivity, don’t rely on baseless argument. Use the tools of using your ego with the intention of love. Walk the path (guided by a Teacher). Then you will not need to believe me or mock me. You’ll see it yourself, as all true Saints have done.

Noteworthy

Mockery is easy. Sincere inquiry is difficult. But I understand your frustration. I am a rational scientist, seeking proof. Bible Interpretation does not demand belief, it offers a way to transform your perception of reality, and that is the only true demonstration that matters.
If you're ever ready, the door is open.

MrPresident1:
Guy, all this big big stomach churning grammar that you are blowing serves no end, no one has the time to try and read what is in your mind or what you want to say. Do yourself a favour and communicate clearly and lucidly

All this love that you people are talking about, you will see the true love when Jesus Christ returns and crushes all these edifice of lies that you all have built and are part of.

Luke 19:27
But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

We shall hear what your fathers will say and plead when this commandment goes out against them

Who is God?
Who is Christ?
Who is Holy Spirit?

BibleInterpreta:

Ah, the classic bait and switch: I ask for evidence, and you supply crappy metaphors. I point out contradictions, and suddenly like magic it’s all symbolic 😅. I call out pseudo-science, and now the Bible’s apparently been doing quantum mechanics since Genesis. Incredible!

You’ve done exactly what I predicted, that you’d 1. strawman the point, 2. defend a baseless claim with an even more ridiculous one, and veer into abstract rambling like a native doctor meandering for time. You basically offered mystical dodge wrapped in absolute jargon. The only outcome you didn’t hit was walking away, honestly it would've have been better that whatever this is.

I quite obviously did not “deride Einstein’s theory”, I derided your laughable misuse of it. You slapped his name onto a vague spiritual, pseudo - philosophical nonsense and tried to it off as depth which again is laughable. That’s not physics, it’s outright fiction, fiction which you obviously can't demonstrate ergo had to strawman.

Quoting relativity to justify metaphysical ego gymnastics is like using quantum mechanics to validate horoscopes. It’s like slapping a nafdac no on agbo jedi jedi and calling it pharmaceutically tested and approved...

Lucifyre:


...

Your so called “bible methodology,” if we can even call it that, is basically: 1. Redefine ,  2. Make up unvalidated bs abd replace facts with subjective feelings, 3. Call yourself deep when cornered. And let’s be honest, saying “the sun stood still” actually means “the ego paused for inner work” is the theological equivalent of a “flat earther explaining gravity with vibes”.

The icing on the cake of  baseless unverifiable claims used as evidence for baseless claims? Slipping in the idea that the Bible prefigured modern science because symbolism. It's like claiming medieval alchemists invented the periodic table because they mentioned ‘fire’ and ‘air.’ Come on, when would you guys ever learn the diff btw "claim" and "evidence".

You couldn't demonstrate a single objective claim, so you rebrand internal feelings as “proof” and package it as transformation. That’s not evidence, it’s delusion verified by vibes. Forget walking the path with your favorite delusional guru, I’d be impressed if you could even drag yourself to a single claim that’s objective, evidence based, and doesn’t evaporate on with reality. There's no need for me "to make a mockery of u guys" or your book, u guys do it just fine on your own, case in point your OT and this joke of a response.

Lucifyre:


Ah, the classic bait and switch: I ask for evidence, and you supply crappy metaphors. I point out contradictions, and suddenly like magic it’s all symbolic 😅. I call out pseudo-science, and now the Bible’s apparently been doing quantum mechanics since Genesis. Incredible!

You’ve done exactly what I predicted, that you’d 1. strawman the point, 2. defend a baseless claim with an even more ridiculous one, and veer into abstract rambling like a native doctor meandering for time. You basically offered mystical dodge wrapped in absolute jargon. The only outcome you didn’t hit was walking away, honestly it would've have been better that whatever this is.

I quite obviously did not “deride Einstein’s theory”, I derided your laughable misuse of it. You slapped his name onto a vague spiritual, pseudo - philosophical nonsense and tried to it off as depth which again is laughable. That’s not physics, it’s outright fiction, fiction which you obviously can't demonstrate ergo had to strawman.

Quoting relativity to justify metaphysical ego gymnastics is like using quantum mechanics to validate horoscopes. It’s like slapping a nafdac no on agbo jedi jedi and calling it pharmaceutically tested and approved...

1. On the Ease of Making Claims vs. Demonstrating Them
"Lol making claims is quite easy, anyone can say any crap..."

Yes, anyone can make claims, we live in a world filled with voices, opinions, and egoistic noise. But bible Interpretation is not about claiming or debating for intellectual sport. It is about personal transformation and attainment. Demonstration, in our method, means internal experience through corrected perception, not performance for entertainment.

2. On the Einstein Theory of Relativity Being "Rubbish"
"...your Einstein theory of relativity, its nonsense..."

Whether you accept it or not, Einstein’s theory, like quantum mechanics, shattered the illusion of a deterministic, mechanical universe. It introduced relativity, uncertainty, and the impact of the observer. These are all ideas bible Interpretation has addressed for millennia; that the observer’s degree of qualitative development defines the reality he perceives. Science is slowly approaching this: reality is subjective, and rooted in perception.

You dismiss relativity as “nonsense” and challenge me to demonstrate it. Einstein’s theory (special and general relativity) is a cornerstone of modern physics, experimentally validated through:
• GPS Systems: Clocks on satellites tick slightly faster than on Earth due to weaker gravity, as predicted by general relativity.
• Gravitational Lensing: Light from distant stars bends around massive objects like the sun, observed during solar eclipses (e.g., Eddington’s 1919 experiment).
• Time Dilation: Particle accelerators show that fast-moving particles (e.g., muons) decay more slowly, aligning with special relativity’s predictions.
I can’t personally replicate these experiments in a conversation, but they’re well-documented in peer-reviewed literature. If you reject relativity outright, could you clarify which aspect you find implausible?

3. On the Alleged Contradiction Between the Bible and Science
"...no contradiction between the bible and scientific s..."

There is no contradiction because the bible speaks in the language of the branches, not physical history. The Bible is not a science textbook. It is encoded in the language of the branches, describing spiritual states. Science studies the material branch, while bible decodes the spiritual root. Without this lens, yes, the stories seem mythological. But through attaining appropriate perception, they are deep spiritual truths.

4. On the “Sun Standing Still”
"...how did the sun stand still... demonstrate how..."

When the Book of Joshua says the sun stood still, it's not discussing astrophysics. The “sun” in bible symbolizes the ego’s governing force or illumination. “Standing still” represents a halting of spiritual concealment — allowing for inner work of correction of the ego to take place. This event occurred not in the sky, but in the inner world of the soul. You cannot “demonstrate” that with corporeal instruments, only attain it within through spiritual development.

5. On Objectivity and the “Three Outcomes”
"...there's 3 outcomes as regards your response..."

You're expecting a response that fits one of your predetermined categories: dodge, faith-talk, or pseudo-science. I offer none. I invite experience, the only honest test. bible Interpretation is not a belief system. It’s a methodology. If you want objectivity, don’t rely on baseless argument. Use the tools of using your ego with the intention of love. Walk the path (guided by a Teacher). Then you will not need to believe me or mock me. You’ll see it yourself, as all true Saints have done.

Noteworthy

Mockery is easy. Sincere inquiry is difficult. But I understand your frustration. I am a rational scientist, seeking proof. Bible Interpretation does not demand belief, it offers a way to transform your perception of reality, and that is the only true demonstration that matters.
If you're ever ready, the door is open.

BibleInterpreta:

1. On the Ease of Making Claims vs. Demonstrating Them
"Lol making claims is quite easy, anyone can say any crap..."

Yes, anyone can make claims, we live in a world filled with voices, opinions, and egoistic noise. But bible Interpretation is not about claiming or debating for intellectual sport. It is about personal transformation and attainment. Demonstration, in our method, means internal experience through corrected perception, not performance for entertainment.

2. On the Einstein Theory of Relativity Being "Rubbish"
"...your Einstein theory of relativity, its nonsense..."

Whether you accept it or not, Einstein’s theory, like quantum mechanics, shattered the illusion of a deterministic, mechanical universe. It introduced relativity, uncertainty, and the impact of the observer. These are all ideas bible Interpretation has addressed for millennia; that the observer’s degree of qualitative development defines the reality he perceives. Science is slowly approaching this: reality is subjective, and rooted in perception.

You dismiss relativity as “nonsense” and challenge me to demonstrate it. Einstein’s theory (special and general relativity) is a cornerstone of modern physics, experimentally validated through:
• GPS Systems: Clocks on satellites tick slightly faster than on Earth due to weaker gravity, as predicted by general relativity.
• Gravitational Lensing: Light from distant stars bends around massive objects like the sun, observed during solar eclipses (e.g., Eddington’s 1919 experiment).
• Time Dilation: Particle accelerators show that fast-moving particles (e.g., muons) decay more slowly, aligning with special relativity’s predictions.
I can’t personally replicate these experiments in a conversation, but they’re well-documented in peer-reviewed literature. If you reject relativity outright, could you clarify which aspect you find implausible?

3. On the Alleged Contradiction Between the Bible and Science
"...no contradiction between the bible and scientific s..."

There is no contradiction because the bible speaks in the language of the branches, not physical history. The Bible is not a science textbook. It is encoded in the language of the branches, describing spiritual states. Science studies the material branch, while bible decodes the spiritual root. Without this lens, yes, the stories seem mythological. But through attaining appropriate perception, they are deep spiritual truths.

4. On the “Sun Standing Still”
"...how did the sun stand still... demonstrate how..."

When the Book of Joshua says the sun stood still, it's not discussing astrophysics. The “sun” in bible symbolizes the ego’s governing force or illumination. “Standing still” represents a halting of spiritual concealment — allowing for inner work of correction of the ego to take place. This event occurred not in the sky, but in the inner world of the soul. You cannot “demonstrate” that with corporeal instruments, only attain it within through spiritual development.

5. On Objectivity and the “Three Outcomes”
"...there's 3 outcomes as regards your response..."

You're expecting a response that fits one of your predetermined categories: dodge, faith-talk, or pseudo-science. I offer none. I invite experience, the only honest test. bible Interpretation is not a belief system. It’s a methodology. If you want objectivity, don’t rely on baseless argument. Use the tools of using your ego with the intention of love. Walk the path (guided by a Teacher). Then you will not need to believe me or mock me. You’ll see it yourself, as all true Saints have done.

Noteworthy

Mockery is easy. Sincere inquiry is difficult. But I understand your frustration. I am a rational scientist, seeking proof. Bible Interpretation does not demand belief, it offers a way to transform your perception of reality, and that is the only true demonstration that matters.
If you're ever ready, the door is open.

Regurgitating trash doesn't change it from being trash 😌

EVERYBODY IS A TEMPLE OF GOD AND CAN BECOME EVERY CHURCH OF GOD.

Lucifyre:


Regurgitating trash doesn't change it from being trash 😌

Since you don't seem to understand what it means that you can never perceive reality beyond your degree of qualitative development, I would like to ask you a very simple none spiritual question.

What scale of technology are we utilizing currently as a global entity?

Your ability or inability to answer this very simple question may help you to grasp what Einstein is trying to say in his theory of relativity.

BibleInterpreta:

Since you don't seem to understand what it means that you can never perceive reality beyond your degree of qualitative development, I would like to ask you a very simple none spiritual question.

What scale of technology are we utilizing currently as a global entity?

Your ability or inability to answer this very simple question may help you to grasp what Einstein is trying to say in his theory of relativity.

There’s nothing to “grasp” because the statement makes no actual sense especially in relation to Einstein, whose theory you still haven’t demonstrated relates to your gish gallop. Einstein's theory we know, what it objectively means we know, how it relates to objective reality we know, it's relationship to your subjective gish gallop we don't know.

And this so called “biblical methodology” you keep name dropping collapses under its own contradiction: you claim objectivity, yet everything you say basically boils down to vague, subjective interpretation wrapped in pseudo-philosophical fluff.

Last I checked, I asked for evidence, not riddles. Tossing out questions like that somehow goes anywhere, when it’s just a distraction from the fact that you can’t demonstrate a single testable claim and would rather strawman and lie. So spare me the mystical quizzes and just do what you’ve consistently avoided:

Show me the Objective evidence/methodology. Quite simple really but we both no you can't.

Lucifyre:


There’s nothing to “grasp” because the statement makes no actual sense especially in relation to Einstein, whose theory you still haven’t demonstrated relates to your gish gallop. Einstein's theory we know, what it objectively means we know, how it relates to objective reality we know, it's relationship to your subjective gish gallop we don't know.

And this so called “biblical methodology” you keep name dropping collapses under its own contradiction: you claim objectivity, yet everything you say basically boils down to vague, subjective interpretation wrapped in pseudo-philosophical fluff.

Last I checked, I asked for evidence, not riddles. Tossing out questions like that somehow goes anywhere, when it’s just a distraction from the fact that you can’t demonstrate a single testable claim and would rather strawman and lie. So spare me the mystical quizzes and just do what you’ve consistently avoided:

Show me the Objective evidence/methodology. Quite simple really but we both no you can't.

Instead of repeating accusations, perform the inner experiment. Use your egoistic desire with the right intention of love toward people. Do it consistently. The changes in your perception, your inner reactions, will be your data points.

BibleInterpreta:

Instead of repeating accusations, perform the inner experiment. Use your egoistic desire with the right intention of love toward people. Do it consistently. The changes in your perception, your inner reactions, will be your data points.

And right on cue, the classic Christian ritual chant of vague, self important fluff, dressed up as depth once the circus tent collapses, u guys sure love ur fluff. No evidence, no objectivity, just the usual empty mantras and typical baseless claims. A flawless textbook demonstration of exactly what I called out. 👏 Welldone.

Lucifyre:


And right on cue, the classic Christian ritual chant of vague, self important fluff, dressed up as depth once the circus tent collapses, u guys sure love ur fluff. No evidence, no objectivity, just the usual empty mantras and typical baseless claims. A flawless textbook demonstration of exactly what I called out. 👏 Welldone.

I am not giving you riddles, I am handing you the entrance to a method that will train your perception to see the universal laws governing soul, society, and creation itself.

In science, we don’t ask the microscope to explain itself, we learn to use it. You are not asked to believe. You are asked to apply the method and measure the result:
Do you experience increased connection, clarity, inner cohesion, perception of the universal system?
If yes, continue.
If no, discard it.

That is the only honest methodology, and it is what the bible meant by 'Taste and see that the Creator is good,' not believe, but taste. Experience. Test.

Objectivity Itself Evolves

Your demand for ‘objective evidence’ ignores the fact that objectivity itself is a construct of the observer’s development - Einstein

You are in the dream. I’m showing you the method to wake up, not to argue inside the dream.

The ‘testable claim’ you seek is you yourself. The method develops a person’s ability to perceive the higher forces that operate desire, not philosophically, but in a repeatable, observable way within the person’s corrected vessels of perception. That is the methodology. It is ancient (since 5,785 years ago), tested, documented, and reproducible, but it requires using you egoistic desire with the intention to bestow toward people, just as a microscope requires calibration before it reveals microorganisms.


Noteworthy

You are not wrong to ask for evidence.

You are wrong to assume evidence is only what your current perception can grasp.

I offer a reproducible methodology to expand perception.

If you apply it, the evidence will emerge within you - not as belief, but as transformation.

Don’t believe me, try it. If it’s false, you’ll know. If it’s true, you’ll know even more.

orisa37:
EVERYBODY IS A TEMPLE OF GOD AND CAN BECOME EVERY CHURCH OF GOD.

? ? ?

BibleInterpreta:

? ? ?

A CHURCH IS TWO OR MORE TEMPLES COMBINED.

orisa37:

A CHURCH IS TWO OR MORE TEMPLES COMBINED.

🤔

BibleInterpreta:
Ever spent time on Nairaland or social media and felt like the same types of people show up in every argument? That’s because they do.
Dunning-Kruger Disciple: The super confident guy who talks like an expert but clearly doesn’t understand what he’s saying.
Then there’s the Belief Perseverance Poster: One who sticks to false info no matter how many facts you show them, and the Contrarian Disorder Commenter: The always-opposite dude who disagrees just to stand out. These kinds of people aren’t just annoying, they confuse others, spread lies, and make real conversations harder. The best thing you can do? Spot them early, don’t fall for the bait, and always speak clearly so others, the quiet ones watching, can see what makes sense.

lordm:
If you reason am too much. You go vex

🤔💡

BibleInterpreta:

I am not giving you riddles, I am handing you the entrance to a method that will train your perception to see the universal laws governing soul, society, and creation itself.

In science, we don’t ask the microscope to explain itself, we learn to use it. You are not asked to believe. You are asked to apply the method and measure the result:
Do you experience increased connection, clarity, inner cohesion, perception of the universal system?
If yes, continue.
If no, discard it.

That is the only honest methodology, and it is what the bible meant by 'Taste and see that the Creator is good,' not believe, but taste. Experience. Test.

Objectivity Itself Evolves

Your demand for ‘objective evidence’ ignores the fact that objectivity itself is a construct of the observer’s development - Einstein

You are in the dream. I’m showing you the method to wake up, not to argue inside the dream.

The ‘testable claim’ you seek is you yourself. The method develops a person’s ability to perceive the higher forces that operate desire, not philosophically, but in a repeatable, observable way within the person’s corrected vessels of perception. That is the methodology. It is ancient (since 5,785 years ago), tested, documented, and reproducible, but it requires using you egoistic desire with the intention to bestow toward people, just as a microscope requires calibration before it reveals microorganisms.


Noteworthy

You are not wrong to ask for evidence.

You are wrong to assume evidence is only what your current perception can grasp.

I offer a reproducible methodology to expand perception.

If you apply it, the evidence will emerge within you - not as belief, but as transformation.

Don’t believe me, try it. If it’s false, you’ll know. If it’s true, you’ll know even more.

What you actually need is a dictionary. Your so called “reproducible methodology” is entirely subjective, personal experience isn't and is never a substitute for objective evidence when dealing with truth. Truth isn’t whatever you feel after meditating hard enough. It’s objective. Look it up.

BibleInterpreta:

🤔💡

I am inviting you to my thread, titled "The letter killeth"...

This is exactly what I have been singing from the top of my voice since I got here....
The entire Bible is about higher consciousness and how to attain it...
God requires us to sacrifice our ego....not a human being or an animal self...

No, those literal interpretation guru will go for my jugular..

sonmvayina:


I am inviting you to my thread, titled "The letter killeth"...

This is exactly what I have been singing from the top of my voice since I got here....
The entire Bible is about higher consciousness and how to attain it...
God requires us to sacrifice our ego....not a human being or an animal self...

No, those literal interpretation guru will go for my jugular..

No one is capable of understanding reality beyond their degree of qualitative development - Einstein theory of relativity.