NewStats: 3,264,252 , 8,183,135 topics. Date: Tuesday, 10 June 2025 at 11:04 AM 1l5o1s

dettolgel:


I have a different opinion on the role of religion on the behaviour of Africans. I think the original African practices actually promote order. Then response to such a barbaric act was swift and brutal either on family level or community level.

The infiltration of foreign religions have modified our response system to such acts. These foreign religious practices, have also influenced how we implement the western form of law and order, which we have all adopted. Religious practices made it such, that we have come to believe and accept as Christians, that we are under obligation to forgive and even turn the other cheek if need be. This thinking has done nothing but emboldened the perpetrators, while placing the victims in bad lights. There have been cases of prominent Christians leaders that took matters to court according to the law, and people victimised them for not forgiving the perpetrators.

While for some religion you are under obligation to kill an offender irrespective of what the constitution says. Even those with responsibility to implement the law, have hidden under their religious obligations to set these perpetrators free. There are cases of rampaging muslims, that have killed and maimed others and they were never held able, because they were following the tenets of their religion.

Such devilsh act, would either resulted in family feud or inter village war in the original African setting. People knew better then and they tend to be strategic about it.

I am not saying that the old system wasn't flawed, I am just pointing out the perculiarity of the system with respect to your submission.

Your opinion is on point and I share same, you are absolutely correct on all facets of your argument. It is actually based on your last sentence that I opine there should be a refinement of that which had existed. Also, I don't know how spiritual you are, but I have some deep knowledge and believe in the things of the spirit. In most cases, some religious beliefs have atrocious bends. To the worshippers' ignorance, they get infested with bad spirits that transcend generations sometimes, negatively affecting their physical lives.
For me, I would rather people are allowed to choose a mode of worship, but there should be a collective rule guiding all which draws some boundaries and curtain certain excesses.
Your assertion about forgiveness, to me, is not necessarily an obligation from man per say, but a commandment from the entity being worshipped. I feel the act cushions evil with good somehow, thus curtailing evil and putting an end to a potential spiral effect.

For instance, if you are hurt, I feel you will feel relieved when you forgive the person who hurt you, and at the same time the person will be paid back by nature (whatever a man sows, same shall he reap). But if you don't, and perhaps go on a revenge trip, a third-party who doesn't know the genesis of the issue may view you differently, and perhaps take it upon himself to mete out revenge on you as though you were the original aggressor, and the chain continues.

Life is more complex than we understand though!

ruffhandu:


Your opinion is on point and I share same, you are absolutely correct on all facets of your argument. It is actually based on your last sentence that I opine there should be a refinement of that which had existed. Also, I don't know how spiritual you are, but I have some deep knowledge and believe in the things of the spirit. In most cases, some religious beliefs have atrocious bends. To the worshippers' ignorance, they get infested with bad spirits that transcend generations sometimes, negatively affecting their physical lives.
For me, I would rather people are allowed to choose a mode of worship, but there should be a collective rule guiding all which draws some boundaries and curtain certain excesses.
Your assertion about forgiveness, to me, is not necessarily an obligation from man per say, but a commandment from the entity being worshipped. I feel the act cushions evil with good somehow, thus curtailing evil and putting an end to a potential spiral effect.

For instance, if you are hurt, I feel you will feel relieved when you forgive the person who hurt you, and at the same time the person will be paid back by nature (whatever a man sows, same shall he reap). But if you don't, and perhaps go on a revenge trip, a third-party who doesn't know the genesis of the issue may view you differently, and perhaps take it upon himself to mete out revenge on you as though you were the original aggressor, and the chain continues.

Life is more complex than we understand though!

I totally agree with you (though not so much on spirituality) but your example portrays clearly the complexity of the relationship between forgiveness and the third party that by extension becomes a party to the case. Humam interaction is complex.

Yes, forgiveness does a lot for the victim. One problem I forsee is people taking advantage of that privilege. Your point on having a rule that guides everyone at least will eliminate the loopholes of ass holes taking advantage of the fact that they will be forgiven. Well the victim should forgive for their own mental and spiritual health, but let the law take its course to deter others from inflicting unnecessary pain on peace loving people.

RightChannel:


How old was Peter Obi when he got married?

How old was Muhammad when he married Aishat? Is muhammad age different from this man's age that killed a 17yr old girl?

You should now rewrite your super story above after answering these questions!

Child marriage is illegal, regardless of the age gap between the child bride and the groom. There is no excuse for marrying a minor in the 21st century. However, we can understand Muhammad's actions within the context of the 7th century, when practices such as slavery were considered acceptable. It is unfair to judge someone from the 7th century by 21st-century standards. Our focus should be on Peter Obi, who married a minor in the 21st century and failed to meet modern standards. He should be the subject of our discussion. What do you think?

Shalom!

Firebomber:


So a 6 years old aishat gave consent to marry your Gigolo fake prophet muhammad 😂

The prophet Muhammad’s marriage Aisha was consummated when she reached age 9. In her later testimony and narration, she affirmed that she had attained puberty by that time. She had every right and opportunity to call off the marriage if she felt off the clock!
Assessing historical standards of maturity using present day standards is inaccurate and uninformed.

dettolgel:


Do you believe that consent can be either subtly or forcefully sorted?

At first an old man tells a girl he is interested in her. But either out of respect or courtesy or indecision, she may ask for time to think about or say no outrightly.

Upon getting home she confides in her mom or sister or friend. She made her true intentions known, which is she doesn't want it. Maybe she told them with the hope to get their , or have her parents stand up for her. At least by telling her we agree with you, you dont have any business with that aged man.
Rather, the parents or friends or sisters may start with pray about it don't say no yet.

Now they start pressuring her subtly. By telling her either directly or indirectly how marrying him will change not only her fortune but that of the family. Or at best the parents may not want to sound materialistic, but will inform her how they started their own marriage and how it isnt a big deal. Or the society will remind her; how rich husbands are scarce and how she needs to get married to earn the respect of society.

Next, the man may start stopping by with gifts for her or her mom, and start being overtly nice to them and to her family. Suddenly, her family or friends or both start paying more attention to her. Also she sees how happy they are whenever the august visitor shows up with goodies.

This subtle actions start influencing her choice either directly or indirectly without her being aware of it. She doesn't want to ruin her parents happiness or cut across as a disobedient child, or lose the little respect she has garnered from her peers, from being find worthy by the rich old man.

Later, she submits to the pressure by saying changing her stance and says Yes to him.

My question is was her true first answer of no valid and if yes why didn't the man and everyother persons involved in this brainwashing process accept it and back off? Or is only the consent of "yes" to a proposal that matters?

Whoever is responsible for forcing the girl into a marriage she doesn’t want, whether subtly or overtly, will bear the responsibility of the sin! Simple

sylve11:
The principles underpinning religion have the potential to yield more beneficial outcomes if they aren't tied to the notion of a superhuman authority dictating the rules of marriage.

It's crucial to recognize the significant impact that these directives have had on human society.

Consequently, it's important to critically evaluate the genuine value of following such practices.

As for me, I take a stand similar to that of Pilate, who distanced himself from the responsibility for Jesus' death. I have made a decisive choice to do the same regarding religious matters.

Disheartening stuff to read on a Thursday morning.

Veste:


Stop being stewpid. A man committed a punishable offence and u are spewing thrash as usual.
Na y dey see una as educated donkeys

Now that you have said your parents are educated donkeys, who am I to say otherwise. Of course you know your parents more than I do, so now that you have said they are educated donkeys, definitely you cannot be wrong

Africa has refused to evolve for useless and backward traditions and practices even in the 21st century.

Shalommy:
That's muslim for us!!... I don't expect anything better than that. Tueeehhh 🙄😠

ALISMILE:


The prophet Muhammad’s marriage Aisha was consummated when she reached age 9. In her later testimony and narration, she affirmed that she had attained puberty by that time. She had every right and opportunity to call off the marriage if she felt off the clock!
Assessing historical standards of maturity using present day standards is inaccurate and uninformed.

Your muhammad wrote a contract marriage with a six years old girl. Please how can a six years old girl give a consent to marriage, what did she even know about marriage 😂

A'ishah reported that the Prophet wrote the marriage contract with her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: “I have been informed that `A'ishah remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e., till his death).” (Al-Bukhari 7: 65)

Can you show us where Aisha claim that she had her first period at the age of 9?

Almunjid:

Child marriage is illegal, regardless of the age gap between the child bride and the groom. There is no excuse for marrying a minor in the 21st century. However, we can understand Muhammad's actions within the context of the 7th century, when practices such as slavery were considered acceptable. It is unfair to judge someone from the 7th century by 21st-century standards. Our focus should be on Peter Obi, who married a minor in the 21st century and failed to meet modern standards. He should be the subject of our discussion. What do you think?

Shalom!

You see where you miss it, you find it difficult to answer the questions but went further justifying what your Muhammad did as a right step!


Peter Obi married his wife in March 1992 and the lady would be 18 in September in the same 1992, is she is mature enough to get married unlike Aishat that married Muhammad when she was 6yrs of age while he was 55. Don't compare Peter Obi with your Muhammad in child's marriage

There is no slavery laws or constitution that says in 7th century, you can marry a preschooler like Aishat, so stop defending nonsense!

RightChannel:


You see where you miss it, you find it difficult to answer the questions but went further justifying what your Muhammad did as a right step!


Peter Obi married his wife in March 1992 and the lady would be 18 in September in the same 1992, is she is mature enough to get married unlike Aishat that married Muhammad when she was 6yrs of age while he was 55. Don't compare Peter Obi with your Muhammad in child's marriage

There is no slavery laws or constitution that says in 7th century, you can marry a preschooler like Aishat, so stop defending nonsense!

Lol, your response is quite funny and intriguing; when I proposed focusing our discussion on Peter Obi, you disappeared for a while, only to return with his marriage date, ready to fervently defend him. Although I respect your dedication to protecting the reputation of those dear to you, but I must express concern about the fact that you're overstepping boundaries in justifying their actions.

In saner climes, child marriage remains an unjustifiable act, regardless of the age disparity between the child bride and the groom or whether the minor is few months away from reaching the age of consent. If you believe Peter Obi's action was acceptable, consider what would happen if you attempted to marry a 17-year-old minor who would turn 18 this September in a Western country. Undoubtedly, you would face severe legal repercussions. This demonstrates that, in societies with a strong sense of justice, there is no distinction between different levels of wrongdoing.

I find it perplexing to witness your staunch criticism of Muhammad while simultaneously exonerating Peter Obi of his transgression. It is unfair to compare an "uneducated" man from the 7th century, when there were no explicit laws prohibiting slavery, child marriage, or the inheritance of one's mother as property, to an "educated" man from the 21st century, who should be held to modern standards. While we can understand Muhammad's adherence to the norms of his era, it is crucial to acknowledge that Peter Obi, as a learned individual, should be held able for failing to adhere to 21st-century laws.

Instead of persistently defending Peter Obi, it is essential to be objective and brave enough to condemn any wrongdoing on his part. After all, he's not infallible, is he? Defending your favorite or beloved politicians when they are in the wrong is not loyalty but blind allegiance.


Peace!

Firebomber:


Your muhammad wrote a contract marriage with a six years old girl. Please how can a six years old girl give a consent to marriage, what did she even know about marriage 😂

A'ishah reported that the Prophet wrote the marriage contract with her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: “I have been informed that `A'ishah remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e., till his death).” (Al-Bukhari 7: 65)

Can you show us where Aisha claim that she had her first period at the age of 9?

Assessing historical standards of maturity using present day standards is inaccurate and uninformed

ALISMILE:
Assessing historical standards of maturity using present day standards is inaccurate and uninformed

Oga stop blowing grammar here, show us where Aisha claim that she started doing her period at the age of 9 as you claim

So you want to tell us that your gigolo fake prophet didn't follow islamic roles of marriage as he went and had a contract marriage with the family of a 6 years old girl. Seriously 😂

Firebomber:


Your muhammad wrote a contract marriage with a six years old girl. Please how can a six years old girl give a consent to marriage, what did she even know about marriage 😂

A'ishah reported that the Prophet wrote the marriage contract with her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: “I have been informed that `A'ishah remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e., till his death).” (Al-Bukhari 7: 65)

Can you show us where Aisha claim that she had her first period at the age of 9?

Bro, no one is forcing you to accept Islam
If Islam doesn’t sound suitable to you, there is no compulsion

ALISMILE:
Bro, no one is forcing you to accept Islam
If Islam doesn’t sound suitable to you, there is no compulsion

Did I look like I'm dumb enough to accept your islam?

I'm asking you to provide proof for your claim, is that too hard for you?

Firebomber:


Did I look like I'm dumb enough to accept your islam?

I'm asking you to provide proof for your claim, is that too hard for you?

The proof you seek will not convince you otherwise as your bias toward Islam is sealed! What you seek is faults, not proof!

Interestingly is the fact that since you can’t find faults within the Islamic doctrines, you resort to attacking the Prophet’s personality to show he wasn’t credible enough!

We understand how you people think
This narrative attacking the Prophet’s marriage to Aisha did not even exist until less than 200 years ago. Despite having many enemies who were determined to undermine his credibility, none ever criticized his marriage to Aisha—because it was historically accepted and uncontroversial at the time.

ALISMILE:
The proof you seek will not convince you otherwise as your bias toward Islam is sealed! What you seek is faults, not proof!

Interestingly is the fact that since you can’t find faults within the Islamic doctrines, you resort to attacking the Prophet’s personality to show he wasn’t credible enough!

We understand how you people think
This narrative attacking the Prophet’s marriage to Aisha did not even exist until less than 200 years ago. Despite having many enemies who were determined to undermine his credibility, none ever criticized his marriage to Aisha—because it was historically accepted and uncontroversial at the time.

Bla bla bla. Just save yourself the stress and show us where Aisha said that she started her period at the age of 9 as you claim.

Everything about your islamic doctrine is faulty that's the reason why even your muhammad don't follow it while he was alive yet you are here crying, should I show you lots of the so called islamic doctrine that your muhammad don't follow?

Who will dare to talk about the hypocrisy of your muhammad 200 years ago when they all know how barbarian his followers are. And the fact that they didn't talk about it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. So stop yabbing and show us proof of your claim.

Firebomber:


Who will dare to talk about the hypocrisy of your muhammad 200 years ago when they all know how barbarian his followers are. And the fact that they didn't talk about it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. So stop yabbing and show us proof of your claim.

What a low IQ comment

They attacked the prophet on numerous grounds, even physically to unalive him, never for once did they attack him on this issue

Almunjid:

There seems to be a double standard when it comes to criticising Islam. When an Igbo or Yoruba Christian man marries a teenager, Christianity won't be criticised; however, when a Muslim does the same, Islam and Prophet Muhammad's influence are immediately blamed.

Peter Obi married a 17-year-old minor, yet neither he nor Christianity was criticised for it. Obidients are trying so hard to avoid the topic, but they are quick to condemn others. This highlights the inconsistent standards applied to different individuals based on their religious affiliations.

Numerous challenges arise in refugee camps, where many women face food shortages. In some cases, they're offered food in exchange for sexual favours. Those who refuse these advances are left to starve. In this instance, the predator took advantage of a vulnerable and starving girl. Her parents, hoping to reduce the burden of feeding more mouths and potentially provide her with a better life, married her off to the 55 years old man, unaware of his true nature.

Moreover, the custom of marrying teenagers has been present in various societies long before the advent of Islam and is deeply ingrained in many cultures worldwide. This practice extends beyond Arab societies and can even be found within your own tribe. It is crucial to emphasise that the forceful marriage and murder should be condemned, rather than the perpetuators' religion. Just as Igbos would rather have people denounce drug trafficking instead of unfairly judging their entire tribe, it is vital to address harmful actions without generalising or targeting an entire religion or ethnic group.



Peace!

pedophile trying to justify their acts.dis the people that married teenagers and minors force themselves on the minors? Did they ? Na question I ask o

Almunjid:

Lol, your response is quite funny and intriguing; when I proposed focusing our discussion on Peter Obi, you disappeared for a while, only to return with his marriage date, ready to fervently defend him. Although I respect your dedication to protecting the reputation of those dear to you, but I must express concern about the fact that you're overstepping boundaries in justifying their actions.

Are you expecting me to be on NL 24/7 when I'm not jobless like you?

As at the year PO got married, her lady was 18yrs of age. Is it your pedophile messenger you want me to be defending?

Almunjid:

In sanner climes, child marriage remains an unjustifiable act, regardless of the age disparity between the child bride and the groom or whether the minor is few months away from reaching the age of consent. If you believe Peter Obi's action was acceptable, consider what would happen if you attempted to marry a 17-year-old minor who would turn 18 this September in a Western country. Undoubtedly, you would face severe legal repercussions. This demonstrates that, in societies with a strong sense of justice, there is no distinction between different levels of wrongdoing.

Your senators and fellow slaves in core North that love to marry under age girl are in a senseless societies right?

In western countries, PO will never be criminalized or prosecuted for his act because as at the year, the lady was 18yrs of age. This is not a case of Muhammad 55 and Aishat 6yrs of age!

Almunjid:

I find it perplexing to witness your staunch criticism of Muhammad while simultaneously exonerating Peter Obi of his transgression. It is unfair to compare an "uneducated" man from the 7th century, when there were no explicit laws prohibiting slavery, child marriage, or the inheritance of one's mother as property, to an "educated" man from the 21st century, who should be held to modern standards. While we can understand Muhammad's adherence to the norms of his era, it is crucial to acknowledge that Peter Obi, as a learned individual, should be held able for failing to adhere to 21st-century laws.

Is it according to your ignorance Muhammad was an illiterate that was not well educated?

Quran 25:5 Pickthall
And they say: Fables of the men of old which he hath had written down so that they are dictated to him morn and evening.


Quran 25:5 Shakir
And they say: The stories of the ancients-- he has got them written-- so these are read out to him morning and evening.

With all these, was Muhammad an illiterate?

Which law gave Muhammad permission to married a child or 6yrs of age?

Almunjid:

Instead of persistently defending Peter Obi, it is essential to be objective and brave enough to condemn any wrongdoing on his part. After all, he's not infallible, is he? Defending your favorite or beloved politicians when they are in the wrong is not loyalty but blind allegiance.


Peace!

PO never did anything wrong like Muhammad at 55 that married a child of 6yrs of age. You should condemn Muhammad with your fellow slaves that love to go for underage girls!

ALISMILE:
What a low IQ comment

They attacked the prophet on numerous grounds, even physically to unalive him, never for once did they attack him on this issue

You have resulted to insult 😂 just like that.

So your prophet was attacked 200 years ago? What a shame 😂

Show you where he was attacked after his islam gain ground and brainwashed his followers to turn barbarian 😂

Oga stop quoting me unless you are ready to show us where aishat says that she started are period at the age of nine as you claim.

Firebomber:


You have resulted to insult 😂 just like that.

So your prophet was attacked 200 years ago? What a shame 😂

Show you where he was attacked after his islam gain ground and brainwashed his followers to turn barbarian 😂

Oga stop quoting me unless you are ready to show us where aishat says that she started are period at the age of nine as you claim.

I apologize if you feel insulted. It can be frustrating when bias interferes with intellectual reasoning, preventing a clear understanding of the discussion.

For instance, you have once again misinterpreted my point by suggesting that the Prophet was attacked 200 years ago. That is not my argument. My argument is that the criticism of the Prophet’s marriage to Aisha only began less than 200 years ago.

During the Prophet’s lifetime, he faced relentless opposition from those who sought to undermine his message—both physically and verbally. However, none of his opponents ever criticized his marriage to Aisha, because such marriages were common at the time due to the prevailing social norms. It was considered completely normal.

In fact, up until about 200 years ago, marriages with similar age disparities were still widely accepted. Even several notable Christian figures, whom I can readily reference, married women of similar age differences.

RightChannel:


Are you expecting me to be on NL 24/7 when I'm not jobless like you?

As at the year PO got married, her lady was 18yrs of age. Is it your pedophile messenger you want me to be defending?





Your senators and fellow slaves in core North that love to marry under age girl are in a senseless societies right?

In western countries, PO will never be criminalized or prosecuted for his act because as at the year, the lady was 18yrs of age. This is not a case of Muhammad 55 and Aishat 6yrs of age!




Is it according to your ignorance Muhammad was an illiterate that was not well educated?

Quran 25:5 Pickthall
And they say: Fables of the men of old which he hath had written down so that they are dictated to him morn and evening.


Quran 25:5 Shakir
And they say: The stories of the ancients-- he has got them written-- so these are read out to him morning and evening.

With all these, was Muhammad an illiterate?

Which law gave Muhammad permission to married a child or 6yrs of age?




PO never did anything wrong like Muhammad at 55 that married a child of 6yrs of age. You should condemn Muhammad with your fellow slaves that love to go for underage girls!

I appreciate the time and effort you've put into writing your argument; however, it appears to be biased and inconsistent. Earlier, you mentioned that Peter Obi married his wife in March 1992, and she would turn 18 in September of the same year. Now you claim she was already 18 when they got married.

You also stated that Peter wouldn't be prosecuted in a Western country because his wife turned 18 within the same year. Even if a girl is just a month away from turning 18, she is still a minor, and engaging in any sexual activity with her could lead to prosecution in jurisdictions with robust child protection laws in Western countries.

Your bias prevents you from acknowledging the differences in societal norms between Muhammad's era and Peter Obi's. During Muhammad's time, there were no explicit prohibitions on practices like slavery and child marriage. If he had owned slaves, would you condemn him for partaking in an activity that was legal and common during his lifetime but has since become morally reprehensible? This wouldn't be a fair assessment.

Regarding Muhammad's literacy, it is historically established that he could neither read nor write. This is confirmed in Surah Al Alaq 96:1-5 of the Qur'an. The verse from Quran 25:5 that you cited to argue for his literacy is taken out of context. This age conveys the assumptions of people around Prophet Muhammad about the source of his teachings. They assumed he had someone write down the stories of the ancients, which were then read to him. Even these speculations implicitly acknowledge his inability to write.

I've attempted to point out the errors, bias, and inconsistencies in your argument. The primary obstacle to productive dialogue is your unwillingness to engage in open-minded discourse. When met with constructive criticism, you resort to hurling insults. Our conversation has reached a stalemate, I will refrain from further participation in this unproductive discussion. Should you become more receptive to alternative perspectives, I would be open to revisiting our exchange. Please do not take offense if I do not reply to your next comment. Thank you for your time nonetheless.

Gracias!

SAMBARRY:
pedophile trying to justify their acts.dis the people that married teenagers and minors force themselves on the minors? Did they ? Na question I ask o

I'm not trying to justify pedophilia; rather, I'm expressing my discomfort with our double standards and hypocrisy on this critical issue. Nigeria is grappling with hypocrisy, as exemplified by a recent tragedy in Edo State, where an apprentice killed his oga over a 17-year-old girl. Despite widespread online condemnation of pedophilia, the reality in southern Nigeria presents a different picture. Even in the south where Northerners are frequently accused of pedophilia, finding teenage virgins remains difficult. This dichotomy raises the question: who is truly responsible for the loss of virginity among these minors?

It appears that some individuals engage in hypocritical behavior, publicly denouncing Islam and Prophet Muhammad for alleged associations with pedophilia, while secretly participating in similar acts themselves. This suggests that, at least for some, the act of marrying minors may be the only point of contention, as engaging in sexual activities with underage individuals seems to be more accepted in the south.

The prevalence of teenage prostitution in southern Nigeria is cause for alarm. If everyone online claims to condemn pedophilia, who then are the ones exploiting these young girls? It seems there's a troubling dissonance between public criticism and private actions when addressing this serious issue.

Peace!

Almunjid:

I appreciate the time and effort you've put into writing your argument; however, it appears to be biased and inconsistent. Earlier, you mentioned that Peter Obi married his wife in March 1992, and she would turn 18 in September of the same year. Now you claim she was already 18 when they got married.

If you want to talk of when PO got married, will you talk about the year or month?

As at 1992 how old was PO and his wife?

As at when Muhammad married Aishat his great grand daughter to be, is it the year you will mention or the month?

A case of PO is different from a case of Muhammad 55 and Aishat 6, stop defending nonsense!

Almunjid:

You also stated that Peter wouldn't be prosecuted in a Western country because his wife turned 18 within the same year. Even if a girl is just a month away from turning 18, she is still a minor, and engaging in any sexual activity with her could lead to prosecution in jurisdictions with robust child protection laws in Western countries.

You don't know much about western laws, better face your sharia law and stop this nonsense. No western law will prosecute PO because as at the YEAR he got married, his wife was 18, again, as at the year not the month!

Almunjid:

Your bias prevents you from acknowledging the differences in societal norms between Muhammad's era and Peter Obi's. During Muhammad's time, there were no explicit prohibitions on practices like slavery and child marriage. If he had owned slaves, would you condemn him for partaking in an activity that was legal and common during his lifetime but has since become morally reprehensible? This wouldn't be a fair assessment.

You shouldn't have brought PO into your shameful norms and traditions in Islam. Is PO a prophet?

As at the time Muhammad married underage girl, did you read it in history of anyone Muhammad emulated that did such?

Bible condemned slavery, Muhammad changed the law of Moses to satisfied his sexual huge. He (Muhammad) said he got inspiration from his allah to commit crime and indecency. He snatched his adopted son's wife all because of sex and he wiped out anyone that condemned his devilish acts!

Almunjid:

Regarding Muhammad's literacy, it is historically established that he could neither read nor write. This is confirmed in Surah Al Alaq 96:1-5 of the Qur'an. The verse from Quran 25:5 that you cited to argue for his literacy is taken out of context. This age conveys the assumptions of people around Prophet Muhammad about the source of his teachings. They assumed he had someone write down the stories of the ancients, which were then read to him. Even these speculations implicitly acknowledge his inability to write.

Are you trying to show us the contradictions in Quran? The Quran chapter and verse I quoted earlier made us to understand Muhammad can read and write!

Almunjid:

I've attempted to point out the errors, bias, and inconsistencies in your argument. The primary obstacle to productive dialogue is your unwillingness to engage in open-minded discourse. When met with constructive criticism, you resort to hurling insults. Our conversation has reached a stalemate, I will refrain from further participation in this unproductive discussion. Should you become more receptive to alternative perspectives, I would be open to revisiting our exchange. Please do not take offense if I do not reply to your next comment. Thank you for your time nonetheless.

Gracias!

Stop defending nonsense to you means an insult right?

Will you allow your 6yrs old daughter to marry an old man of 55yrs of age?

Islam and it's disadvantages

RightChannel:


You need brain surgery!

Tell that to the one you look up to as your father.
That's if you are not a product of a leaked condom.

frainc:

Tell that to the one you look up to as your father.
That's if you are not a product of a leaked condom.

I spit on your existence defending nonsense! You ought to have been thrown inside lagoon

RightChannel:


I spit on your existence defending nonsense! You ought to have been thrown inside lagoon

Don't waste that spit because it won't be enough to lube your Mama's kpekus for your friends to use as usual.

frainc:

Don't waste that spit because it won't be enough to lube your Mama's kpekus for your friends to use as usual.

Nothing remain for ya olosho mama, Dey don use am to cash out, sebi you notice that you are both living miserable lives!

RightChannel:


Nothing remain for ya olosho mama, Dey don use am to cash out, sebi you notice that you are both living miserable lives!

I thought your response will be hard.
You are too weak for my punch.

Before i go, don't forget to ask your mama for the name of her last brother who slept with her before you were conceived, that could be the father you have been searching for.

Bye.