NewStats: 3,264,085 , 8,182,546 topics. Date: Monday, 09 June 2025 at 03:35 PM 436tv

airmark:


You wanted Rohr to go and didn't mind anyone hired by NFF. In fact, I have looked for where you criticized NFF for g Peseiro, I couldn't see.

Rest and enjoy your L.

Stop lieing just to push agenda.

I wanted Rohr to go and I wanted Renard hired. Are you this shameless?

airmark:


Assuming Peseiro is performing wonders, he would have come out in his babaringa, just like he did when Sterling dribbled Walker, and posted his 'I told you' epistle. But now, Timbros no know Peseiro papa

I don't have anythingnto do with Peseiro.

When Eguavoen (Rohr's replacement) was doing well in group stage of AFCON, did I come with any 'I told you' epistle?

popizaino:


Stop projecting,you are the one clutching at that straw.

Shut up.

You clearly accused me. Prove it let me see.

timbros:


Do you now accept that I never ed Peseiro appointment?

No, i don't.

popizaino:



Forget about airmark.........Tell us how the team is improving without Rohr as you told us.

Why should I forget airmark? He jumped into a conversation he know nothing about, just for the sole purpose of mocking me. You aided him by accusing me falsely. And now you want me to forget him?

Really?

Why did you tell him I ed the appointment of Peseiro, even going further to claim that evidence full yapa?

popizaino:



Strawman.


Why did you tell Nigerians you don't care about who replaces Rohr?

This is what I told Nigerians below...

Havertz29s:
I wonder what took you so long to reply?


Post made on sept 24, you waited till nov 14 to reply after sterling have finished destroying 9 men tottenham and his former lover and their 30 yrs RB

We don't have the luxury of playing luton, burnley, blackburn and 9 men tottenham every matchday.

Our best attacker warned not to be seen anywhere near his national team training camp

Is that all?

popizaino:



The only thing everyone sees is that you said you don't care about who replaces Rohr.

Another lie.

This is what everyone see.

Disstroy genuinely wanted to know my view. He was not after any agenda that's why he specifically asked me who I think should replace Rohr, and I made myself very clear.

You know the truth, but agenda and pride will not allow you accept your goof.

popizaino:



I'm still coming to that but i want him to accept what he said with his own mouths before we proceed.

Look at what I said with my own mouth.

Where are the evidences wey yapa you told Airmark of?

Kimbeast:
Is that all?

This is outdated and overused
come on, don't be a chicken you can do better

Jodera:
He was not replacing anybody. He was just a stop gap.

There's a reason he's called "interim".

I no go school o, but is this not the definition of replace?

If you replace one thing or person with another, you put something or someone else in their place to do their job

Was Ljunberg not put in Emery's position, to do his job? Isn't that replacement?

Na wao.... You are not even arguing that Ljunberg replace Emery for the mean time, till a permanent replacement is found. That would be another thing entirely. Telling me that Ljunberg did not replace anybody is you being economical with the truth.

Havertz29s:
This is outdated and overused

come on, don't be a chicken you can do better

Is that all?

izzou:


No, i don't.

Well if you insist, then it's now clear to everyone that you intentionally wanted to push and agenda, and I have clearly proved all of you wrong.

timbros:


Stop lieing just to push agenda.

I wanted Rohr to go and I wanted Renard hired. Are you this shameless?

You said you didn't care who replaced Rohr and when Peseiro was signed, you didn't object.

This L you are trying to shy away from, will eventually choke you.

Ibime:
Timbros, read this. Those of us wey know Naija football politics know why we backed Rohr. He was a breath of fresh air after 2 decades of seeing 40 years old players getting call up

Now we are bringing out calculator again in group where Lesotho, Zimbabwe and SA are our only challenges

Only few people understand how things work in this country. And the few of us voice no loud reach.. The ones with zero understanding get loud voice...

I was surprised when I saw Nigerians ing the sack of Rohr.. Like if you know that team before Rohr came him, you go respect Rohr..

But I no know if Nigerians get short memories, or they just be actual stupeed people , or they lack basic understanding about things. I just don't get..

See where them don bring themselves back to.. It's clear we aren't gonna qualify from this group..If south win today, they are 4points ahead of us..

airmark:


You said you didn't care who replaced Rohr and when Peseiro was signed, you didn't object.

This L you are trying to shy away from, will eventually choke you.

Why will I object when it was Eguavoen that replaced Rohr? Wetin concern me with Peseiro?

Did I mention names that I want for the job? Was Peseiro name there? What did you ask Popizaino?

You see this screenshot below? It will forever choke you and your goons... It is there in black and white. All your agenda is DoA...

Una weight no reach.

timbros:


Another lie.

This is what everyone see.

Disstroy genuinely wanted to know my view. He was not after any agenda that's why he specifically asked me who I think should replace Rohr, and I made myself very clear.

You know the truth, but agenda and pride will not allow you accept your goof.

When Peseiro was appointed, did you object to it? That now confirms your view that you don't care about anyone that replaced Rohr.

Now you need to be flogged with koboko at the back of your neck.

airmark:


When Peseiro was appointed, did you object to it? That now confirms your view that you don't care about anyone that replaced Rohr.

Now you need to be flogged with koboko at the back of your neck.

Why will I object someone somewhere in when the replacement for the job is Eguavoen? Are you okay like this?

So Chelsea sack Scolari and replace him with Hiddink, I will now go and start criticising Ancelotti who has nothing to do with Chelsea job yet.

Does it make sense to you Airmark? Sometimes make you stand one side as observer and read some of your comments. You will bury your head in shame, I assure you.

timbros:


Why will I object someone somewhere in when the replacement for the job is Eguavoen? Are you okay like this?

You are the one not ok, and everybody have told you.

NFF announced Peseiro as Rohr's permanent replacement. You should have objected if not ok with him. But because your solution was Rohr must go and anyone could replace him, you didn't object.

You need to stop embarrassing yourself.

timbros:


Why will I object when it was Eguavoen that replaced Rohr? Wetin concern me with Peseiro?

Did I mention names that I want for the job? Was Peseiro name there? What did you ask Popizaino?

You see this screenshot below? It will forever choke you and your goons... It is there in black and white. All your agenda is DoA...

Una weight no reach.

Who said 'i don't care who replaces Rohr, he must go to move forward'?

timbros:


I no go school o, but is this not the definition of replace?

If you replace one thing or person with another, you put something or someone else in their place to do their job

Was Ljunberg not put in Emery's position, to do his job? Isn't that replacement?

Na wao.... You are not even arguing that Ljunberg replace Emery for the mean time, till a permanent replacement is found. That would be another thing entirely. Telling me that Ljunberg did not replace anybody is you being economical with the truth.

Actually, the answer is a resounding Nooo @bolded!!

Ljunberg was just meant to fill in while we went about looking for someone to actually do the job Emery was expected to do(since arsenal can't be a club who would be without a coach).

While I get your point on "replacement" but we're dealing with English here and English is mostly about context. Ljunberg as an interim never had the full responsibility, ability nor authority Emery had, so how do you expect him to be expected to do Emery's Job?
Everyone knows that, as an interim, your responsibility is "loose"

There's a reason everybody knows that Arteta took over/replaced Emery and never Ljunberg.(including you). All newsite, blogs and all says Arteta replaced Emery. If Ljunberg replaced Emery, why haven't any site said that Arteta replaced Ljunberg?

....Like a servant waiting for his master's son to take over his Master's properties. Everyone knows it'll be wrong to call the servant "master" just because he's overseeing the preparation of the master's son's coming.

*unfollows thread*

timbros:


Why will I object when it was Eguavoen that replaced Rohr? Wetin concern me with Peseiro?

Did I mention names that I want for the job? Was Peseiro name there? What did you ask Popizaino?

You see this screenshot below? It will forever choke you and your goons... It is there in black and white. All your agenda is DoA...

Una weight no reach.

Eguavoen is even worse than Peseiro

timbros:


Another lie.

This is what everyone see.

Dis.stroy genuinely wanted to know my view. He was not after any agenda that's why he specifically asked me who I think should replace Rohr, and I made myself very clear.

You know the truth, but agenda and pride will not allow you accept your goof.

In Timbros' defense, I just wanted to know what alternative he had to Rohr; better alternative. The flow of the back-and-forth showed I wasn't pushing any agenda beyond wanting to know who he thinks is a better alternative.
---

Wait... Why am I defending a Chelsea fan on a footballing issue?

airmark:


You are the one not ok, and everybody have told you.

NFF announced Peseiro as Rohr's permanent replacement. You should have objected if not ok with him. But because your solution was Rohr must go and anyone could replace him, you didn't object.

You need to stop embarrassing yourself.

You must be lieing to yourself and your conscience if you refuse to acknowledge that I recommended Renard for the job.

Stop embarrassing yourself. It's so shameful.

airmark:


Who said 'i don't care who replaced Rohr, he must go to move forward'?

Who said hire Renard?

Jodera:

Actually, the answer is a resounding Nooo @bolded!!

Ljunberg was just meant to fill in while we went about looking for someone to actually do the job Emery was expected to do(since arsenal can't be a club who would be without a coach).

While I get your point on "replacement" but we're dealing with English here and English is mostly about context. Ljunberg as an interim never had the full responsibility, ability nor authority Emery had, so how do you expect him to be expected to do Emery's Job?
Everyone knows that, as an interim, your responsibility is "loose"

There's a reason everybody knows that Arteta took over/replaced Emery and never Ljunberg.(including you). All newsite, blogs and all says Arteta replaced Emery. If Ljunberg replaced Emery, why haven't any site said that Arteta replaced Ljunberg?

....Like a servant waiting for his master's son to take over his Master's properties. Everyone knows it'll be wrong to call the servant "master" just because he's overseeing the preparation of the master's son's coming.

To fill in what vacancy? Is there no one there before?

What other context are you talking about when the definition of replace is as clear below as anything?

Ibime:


Eguavoen is even worse than Peseiro

He looked worst because of the magnitude of the loss against Ghana, our eternal rivals.

I don't know what the future would have looked like if Eguavoen was given more time but I don't think Peseiro would have been better than him.

DissTroy:


In Timbros' defense, I just wanted to know what alternative he had to Rohr; better alternative. The flow of the back-and-forth showed I wasn't pushing any agenda beyond wanting to know who he thinks is a better alternative.
---

Wait... Why am I defending a Chelsea fan on a footballing issue?

Thank you.

Agenda pushers will come for you soon.

izzou:
*unfollows thread*

Better for you.

Continue ing agenda until the table turn one day.

All of us will be here the day the narrative will change and you guys will want to prove to us that Eguavoen once replaced Rohr as Super Eagles coach. We go dey here that day.

Or when all caoch na coach. Interim or not.

No be this thread again?

timbros:


He looked worst because of the loss against Ghana, our eternal rival and considering the weight of the loss.

I don't know what the future would have looked like if Eguavoen was given more time but I don't think Peseiro would have been better than him.

Eguavoen wey fúck up 2010 world cup qualifiers and led our most embarrassing loss against Ghana 4-1 in 2007. Eguavoen wey be corrupt padi man whose only usefulness is saying yes to every NFF demand on placing wack players in the team. Eguavoen that lost to Tunisia in the same AFCON and went out to a very poor Ghana team in qualifiers. Eguavoen is the most useless manager ever in SE history. Even as a player, he was over useless, giving Italy free penalty to defeat us in 1994 with 10 men. Even both our goals conceded against Argentina in 1994 WC were caused by Eguavoen stupidity. Eguavoen the dunce who took his shirt off to celebrate Amokachis winning goal during qualifiers for World Cup 1998 and got a red card, putting out qualification in jeopardy. Eguavoen is as stupid as he looks and corrupt to the core.

Gernot Rohr never failed to qualify Naija comfortably for World Cups, never failed to reach semi-final of AFCON, always integrated new and young players na whom you want comot for a corrupt stupid fool like Eguavoen

It's obvious you don't know Super Eagles history, and you should rest from commenting on it.