NewStats: 3,264,144 , 8,182,756 topics. Date: Monday, 09 June 2025 at 08:43 PM 4t5j5

elated177:


Who is exhibiting cluelessness between the two of us?

Of course it would sound odd because the answer is obvious even for the most foolish mind to understand. The male has penis. The female has vagina. The vagina, the sex organ of the female, is designed in such a way that it accepts the penis - the sex organ of the male. It even secretes its own natural lubes. How explicit and resounding do you want nature to make the assertion?

Can you say the same for homosexuality?

Anything more than one person does together to have orgasms or other sexually satisfying sensations is sex...

There are so many ways for a same-gender couple too have sex..There are countless way that lead to sexual pleasures...PiV is not the only sexual act available out there..brace up and stop day dreaming..

It’s not natural” is a stupid argument for any human activity.
Wearing clothes is not natural...Air conditioning is not natural...Buildings and cars and money are not natural...Almost nothing in the modern world is “natural” for a human being...

The natural state of human beings is as naked hunter-gatherers living in small family groups on the African savanna... If you’re not willing to commit to that, don’t try to play the “natural” card...

Ask yourself this…
Is engaging in sex with the same gender natural?
You might say no...You can’t have offspring so it mustn’t be natural...

But take a look at the definition of natural...
"Existing in or derived from nature; not made or caused by humankind."
Homosexuality is literally defined as natural...Anything which can occur in nature must be natural...So how is something that’s clearly natural thought of as a unnatural?

The answer is culture...
It is not nature that says homosexuality is unnatural it’s culture...Culture has made its mind up and determined that homosexuality is unnatural...

But culture isn’t nature so what unnatural really means is this: a deviation from the cultural norms.....
Is homosexuality unnatural? No.

Is homosexuality deviating from many cultural norms? Yes.
Homosexuality always has and always will be natural It’s our culture that says it isn’t... understood?
Cc:Flamemignon1

elated177:


And the penis of one male can't still open for the penis of the other male to penetrate. The vagina of one lesbian can't spread for the vagina of another lesbian for sexual activity.
Can't you see that homosexuality is abnormal and unnatural?

Are you much of a pervert that sex is the only thing you think of once you hear the term "homosexuality"?

Flamemignon1:

Are you much of a pervert that sex is the only thing you think of once you hear the term "homosexuality"?

He was making a point you couldn't counter.

homo is bad
homosexuality is wrong
Homosexuality is BS

Sane people pls beware of needless rainbow artifacts especially from animated cartoons. They're trying so hard to force this shit on kids these days.

Anon4:

He was making a point you couldn't counter.

homo is bad
homosexuality is wrong
Homosexuality is BS

Sane people pls beware of needless rainbow artifacts especially from animated cartoons. They're trying so hard to force this shit on kids these days.

I won't give you any headway because you are in no place of power of a medical figure to pay attention to

The fact is don't want to know what anyone, even if it's my own children do sexually, the image of a man going ham on my daughter is equally disturbing.
I'd just feel disturbed and conflicted like walking in on your parents having sex. Something you would never desire to witness.

Sex is between the consenting individuals involved, and I should have no part in what others choose to do privately. Even if it's my son, if I assume they are a fully grown adult, then I don't own them. I would walk away and suppress the memory of what I witnessed.

Cousin9999:
You're either a troll, closeted, or taking out your frustrations with your own life on easy targets.

I also suspect op to be possibly closeted.

He displays way too much interest on this topic far beyond the typical anti-gay religious rhetoric.

Whatever gay folks want to do with their lives is non of my business, quite frankly, I'm indifferent to their existence ....

However if you come near me or my family with gay vibes, I'll have you seriously dealt with ...

FERNANDEZISBACK:

Well if you think that homosexuality is wrong because it is "unnatural" then you don't know mother nature really well...Humans are not the only species wherein you would find homosexuals...And it's not just homosexuality which exists in nature but also a lot of other kinds of behavior as well which humans would consider as a crime or unnatural if they'd do it..

Being stupid is not natural does that make it unethical to be a stupid homophobe?
Besides homosexuality is natural otherwise why the hell would it exist?

Do you think people sit down one day and decide.."I think I'll be attracted only to of my own sex from today!"
Do straight people do that similarly for the opposite sex?

It's their nature and they have a right to live as they wish without someone saying its wrong or making a stupid fuss!..
So pls keep mute and stop embarrassing yourself.. talking nonsense all the time makes you f**lish..you and your imaginary creature should start thinking...you have to grow up and stop whining like a kid over people's personal choice that doesn't even affect you..*pukes*

I luv the way u blanket nonsense with half-baked English words.

Keep it up bruh

BigRocky:


I luv the way u blanket nonsense with half-baked English words.

Keep it up bruh

Blanking indeed..what a little boy..go argue with your underage mates..

FERNANDEZISBACK:

Blanking indeed..what a little boy..go argue with your underage mates..

With the speed you reply mentions,it obvious you feed off attentions .

No wonder you are deliberately been stupid.lol

"Anything to mk people quote me"

BigRocky:


With the speed you reply mentions,it obvious you feed off attentions .

No wonder you are deliberately been stupid.lol

"Anything to mk people quote me"

If you ain't you wouldn't quote me in the first place..go play with your age mate..you are a little boy who knows nothing about life..I shouldn't be having a conversation with you..
Go meet her..

FERNANDEZISBACK:

If you ain't you wouldn't quote me in the first place..go play with your age mate..you are a little boy who knows nothing about life..I shouldn't be having a conversation with you..
Go meet her..

A little boy with sence is better than an adult transgendered that would do anything for social media validation.

"A fool at forty"they say......

FERNANDEZISBACK:



Anything more than one person does together to have orgasms or other sexually satisfying sensations is sex...

There are so many ways for a same-gender couple too have sex..There are countless way that lead to sexual pleasures...PiV is not the only sexual act available out there..brace up and stop day dreaming..

What kind of sexual activity does not involve the sexual organs? Can you mention one?

FERNANDEZISBACK:

It’s not natural” is a stupid argument for any human activity.
Wearing clothes is not natural...Air conditioning is not natural...Buildings and cars and money are not natural...Almost nothing in the modern world is “natural” for a human being...

Where did you get that from? So humans were supposed to move about without clothes, huh? Chai!

FERNANDEZISBACK:


The natural state of human beings is as naked hunter-gatherers living in small family groups on the African savanna... If you’re not willing to commit to that, don’t try to play the “natural” card...

Absolute hocus pocus. What a humbug!

FERNANDEZISBACK:

Ask yourself this…
Is engaging in sex with the same gender natural?
You might say no...You can’t have offspring so it mustn’t be natural...

But take a look at the definition of natural...
"Existing in or derived from nature; not made or caused by humankind."
Homosexuality is literally defined as natural...Anything which can occur in nature must be natural...So how is something that’s clearly natural thought of as a unnatural?

If you want people to believe that nature approves of homosexuality, made provisions for it, address or counter the assertions below and answer the questions where necessary.

The male has penis. The female has vagina. The vagina, the sex organ of the female, is designed in such a way that it accepts the penis - the sex organ of the male. It even secretes its own natural lubes. How explicit and resounding do you want nature to make the assertion?


Well, the provisions that nature made for males to have sexual relationships with females are explicitly displayed by the sexual organs of both males and females. It was/is a resounding assertion.

Truly, if nature wanted people of the same-sex to engage in any kind of sexual relationship, the bodies of the male and the female would have been equipped with both male and female sex organs. It is simple to understand.

When two males have sex, why isn't it possible for one male to penetrate the other male via his penis? Why do they resort to evacuation of faeces?

Why can't a female use her vagina to penetrate the vagina of another female? Why do they still revert to prosthetics and penis-like objects?

Why is it that between two people of the same sex who are in their so-called relationship, one must act like a female or a male in almost all the cases?

And the penis of one male can't still open for the penis of the other male to penetrate. The vagina of one lesbian can't spread for the vagina of another lesbian for sexual activity.
Can't you see that homosexuality is abnormal and unnatural?

FERNANDEZISBACK:

The answer is culture...
It is not nature that says homosexuality is unnatural it’s culture...Culture has made its mind up and determined that homosexuality is unnatural...

But culture isn’t nature so what unnatural really means is this: a deviation from the cultural norms.....
Is homosexuality unnatural? No.

Is homosexuality deviating from many cultural norms? Yes.
Homosexuality always has and always will be natural It’s our culture that says it isn’t... understood?

You have no idea of what you are saying. If you did, you would have realized that some cultural beliefs stem from nature. Some cultural beliefs are against nature. Any culture that condemns homosexuality is a good one and is line with nature.

Nature, regardless of what any culture says or how any culture views homosexuality, has explicitly and unequivocally asserted that homosexuality is abominable and detestable. Period. End of the matter.

IMAliyu2:


I also suspect op to be possibly closeted.

He displays way too much interest on this topic far beyond the typical anti-gay religious rhetoric.

Exactly what anyone who doesn't want the abominable and detestable act of homosexuality condemned would say. Emotional blackmail won't cut it.

Is it only closeted? Openeted kwanu?

elated177:



Well, the provisions that nature made for males to have sexual relationships with females are explicitly displayed by the sexual organs of both males and females. It was/is a resounding assertion.

Truly, if nature wanted people of the same-sex to engage in any kind of sexual relationship, the bodies of the male and the female would have been equipped with both male and female sex organs. It is simple to understand.

When two males have sex, why isn't it possible for one male to penetrate the other male via his penis? Why do they resort to evacuation of faeces?

Why can't a female use her vagina to penetrate the vagina of another female? Why do they still revert to prosthetics and penis-like objects?

Why is it that between two people of the same sex who are in their so-called relationship, one must act like a female or a male in almost all the cases?

Answer those questions first.



Homosexuality is an aberration.

The argument of male Instruments fitting perfectly into the female Instruments can always be flawed anytime.

There are loopholes in the lock and key / ball and socket t theory and a low level homosexual will flaw it easily.


Factor these:

Using the lock and key theory is somewhat valid for both heterosexuals and gays, but not lesbians as two women can't lock.

There are some men with micropenis and can never have a normal coitus with a woman.

If the ultimate purpose of sex is for reproduction and not for "entertainment" what about women who can not give birth.

Not all women lubricate.

The Vargina and peinis are not the only sexual organs in the human anatomy.

Talking of sin, homosexuality is not worse than premarital sex which is common amongst youths who think devouted religious people.

Homosexuality is not a cultural thing. The argument that is natural or unnatural will be flawed everytime. I do agree it is not sustainable and its promotion isn't good, but we have thousands of "micro-sins" out there that you and I have committed today which are equally bad.

RedpillAnalyst:


The argument of male Instruments fitting perfectly into the female Instruments can always be flawed anytime.

There are loopholes in the lock and key / ball and socket t theory and a low level homosexual will flaw it easily.


Factor these:

Using the lock and key theory is somewhat valid for both heterosexuals and gays, but not lesbians as two women can't lock.

There are some men with micropenis and can never have a normal coitus with a woman.

If the ultimate purpose of sex is for reproduction and not for "entertainment" what about women who can not give birth.

Not all women lubricate.

The Vargina and peinis are not the only sexual organs in the human anatomy.

Talking of sin, homosexuality is not worse than premarital sex which is common amongst youths who think devouted religious people.

Homosexuality is not a cultural thing. The argument that is natural or unnatural will be flawed everytime. I do agree it is not sustainable and its promotion isn't good, but we have thousands of "micro-sins" out there that you and I have committed today which are equally bad.

Apart from the penis and vagina, what other physical sexual organs are there in the human anatomy?

Is the anus for sex? Nope! The anus is not a sex organ. So the "lock" thingy which you assigned to faggótry is an aberation. You see, just as I pointed out above, the vagina and the penis are sex organs and they effectively complement each other during coitus. Now, if a male was naturally designed to have sex with another male, by that very fact making homosexuality natural, the penis would have had the ability to open for another penis to penetrate. The same applies to the vagina and lesbianism.

There is a reason a male is born with a penis - whether micro or macro - and not with a vagina as well. The same with a female.

The vagina was designed perfectly for the penis. No one can "flaw" such. It is an unimpeachable assertion.


Homosexuality is abnormal and unnatural. No one can "flaw" such assertion. Nature abhors it. With what facts?

Sin is sin. That sin is sin does not mean that we shouldn't talk about how sinful a sinful act is. This thread is not about stealing, lying, cheating, fornication, etc. Nope! It is about the abominable act of homosexuality. Discussing it has not exempted other sins. Why do homosexuality apologists resort to this all the time?

I can't saying that homosexuality was/is a cultural thing.

About micro sin or macro sin, speak for yourself.

That not all vaginas lubricate, according to you, does not negate the fact that the vagina is the only natural hole which a penis should be going into for sexual activity.

So, Mr redpillanalyst, you have succeeded in analyzing nothing here. If you really want to be homosexuality apologist, tackle the questions. Here they are again:


males to have sexual relationships with females are explicitly displayed by the sexual organs of both males and females. It was/is a resounding assertion.

Truly, if nature wanted people of the same-sex to engage in any kind of sexual relationship, the bodies of the male and the female would have been equipped with both male and female sex organs. It is simple to understand.

When two males have sex, why isn't it possible for one male to penetrate the other male via his penis? Why do they resort to evacuation of faeces?

Why can't a female use her vagina to penetrate the vagina of another female? Why do they still revert to prosthetics and penis-like objects?

Why is it that between two people of the same sex who are in their so-called relationship, one must act like a female or a male in almost all the cases?


Your colleague, to whom those questions were directed, couldn't handle any of them.

elated177:


Apart from the penis and vagina, what other physical sexual organs are there in the human anatomy?

Is the anus for sex? Nope! The anus is not a sex organ. So the "lock" thingy which you assigned to faggótry is an aberation. You see, just as I pointed out above, the vagina and the penis are sex organs and they effectively complement each other during coitus. Now, if a male was naturally designed to have sex with another male, by that very fact making homosexuality natural, the penis would have had the ability to open for another penis to penetrate. The same applies to the vagina and lesbianism.

There is a reason a male is born with a penis - whether micro or macro - and not with a vagina as well. The same with a female.

The vagina was designed perfectly for the penis. No one can "flaw" such. It is an unimpeachable assertion.


Homosexuality is abnormal and unnatural. No one can "flaw" such assertion. Nature abhors it. With what facts?

Sin is sin. That sin is sin does not mean that we shouldn't talk about how sinful a sinful act is. This thread is not about stealing, lying, cheating, fornication, etc. Nope! It is about the abominable act of homosexuality. Discussing it has not exempted other sins. Why do homosexuality apologists resort to this all the time?

I can't saying that homosexuality was/is a cultural thing.

About micro sin or macro sin, speak for yourself.

That not all vaginas lubricate, according to you, does not negate the fact that the vagina is the only natural hole which a penis should be going into for sexual activity.

So, Mr redpillanalyst, you have succeeded in analyzing nothing here. If you really want to be homosexuality apologist, tackle the questions. Here they are again:


males to have sexual relationships with females are explicitly displayed by the sexual organs of both males and females. It was/is a resounding assertion.

Truly, if nature wanted people of the same-sex to engage in any kind of sexual relationship, the bodies of the male and the female would have been equipped with both male and female sex organs. It is simple to understand.

When two males have sex, why isn't it possible for one male to penetrate the other male via his penis? Why do they resort to evacuation of faeces?

Why can't a female use her vagina to penetrate the vagina of another female? Why do they still revert to prosthetics and penis-like objects?

Why is it that between two people of the same sex who are in their so-called relationship, one must act like a female or a male in almost all the cases?


Your colleague, to whom those questions were directed, couldn't handle any of them.

I am not advocating for same relations neither do I say it is the worst thing humans do. I want to let you know most people in the LGBTQ spectrum are intellectuals and they will flaw your argument swiftly if you say the penis is exclusively designed for the vagina because of the shape and what not.

Penis and Vagina are reproductive organs. They are not the only sexual organs, You know sex can be accomplished without necessarily using the reproductive organs.

Some people get off with just nipple and navel manipulation. Some women get off riding horses or sitting on a spinning washing machine. I am sure you have heard the word Mouth Gig and Hanal entry non-LGTBQ folks and married couples you see everyday do this more than you know and that's not really a sin or abomination.


They would say if God didn't want people to be having pre or extra marital sex humans would have been made to only get pleasure with their husband or wife only.

We have the same stance, but your points will not fly if your were to make a case as a leader of a church, a state or a country.

RedpillAnalyst:

I am not advocating for same relations neither do I say it is the worst thing humans do. I want to let you know most people in the LGBTQ spectrum are intellectuals and they will flaw your argument swiftly if you say the penis is exclusively designed for the vagina because of the shape and what not.

You really are advocating same-sex sexual relationships. Actually, homosexuality will always be one of the worst things that any human being will ever engage in. Do you know the kind and level of uncleanness associated with homosexuality? It wasn't for nothing that the Creator of the heavens, the earth, the seas and everything in them, the one and only true God, YHVH Almighty, called it detestable and abominable. It is a vile affection.

Spiritually sensitive persons, including those who engage in it, know that homosexuality pollutes the environment spiritually.

Aren't you one of the lgbtwhatever? Aren't you trying to do that here and failing miserably? With what are you going to "flaw" an unimpeachable fact? It is the eternal Covenant - eternal truth, if you prefer. The penis and the vagina are made for each other, as long as sex is concerned. The only hole that the penis is supposed to penetrate sexually is the vagina. Any other hole is unnatural and abnormal. Sticking the penis into the anus is an aberation.


Why didn't you refute the assertion that the anus is not a sex organ?

Why is it not possible for the penis of one male to open for the penis of another male to penetrate during the abominable act of homosexuality? Why do they resort to evacuation of excrement?

Why can't one female use her vagina to penetrate the vagina of the other female during their detestable sexual activity? Why do the still revert or resort to prosthetics and other penis-like objects?

Answer those questions?

If nature wanted two males to have sex with each other, males would have been equipped with both male and female sex organs - penis and vagina. The same with the females - both vagina and penis.

Why is it that between two people of the same sex who are in the abominable same-sex sexual relationship with each other, one acts like the member of the opposite sex? Do you have any explanation here, redpillanalyst?

RedpillAnalyst:


Penis and Vagina are reproductive organs. They are not the only sexual organs, You know sex can be accomplished without necessarily using the reproductive organs.

How would you define an "accomplished" sex?

RedpillAnalyst:


Some people get off with just nipple and navel manipulation. Some women get off riding horses or sitting on a spinning washing machine. I am sure you have heard the word Mouth Gig and Hanal entry non-LGTBQ folks and married couples you see everyday do this more than you know and that's not really a sin or abomination.

You haven't said anything.

As a saint, servant and messenger of the one and only true God, YHVH Almighty, the Creator and Father of all spirits, fellatió and cunnilingus are outside scripturally recommended sexual activities. We, the saint, servants and messengers, of YHVH Almighty, of Yahushua the Messiah, do not engage in such. Our mouths and tongues are not for such acts. Such acts are probably the inventions of demons.

RedpillAnalyst:


They would say if God didn't want people to be having pre or extra marital sex humans would have been made to only get pleasure with their husband or wife only.

Which people would say such? Who are the "they"?

RedpillAnalyst:


We have the same stance, but your points will not fly if your were to make a case as a leader of a church, a state or a country.

I don't know what you are talking about?

kals4luv990:
but yu got it all wrong here ni..if nature wanted both sexes to mate it would have made provisions for it but it did not
Please stop all this,I know yu are not homosexual so dnt lead others astray..biko

Good ol' nature. I'm so glad it made provision for you to have a phone and drive a car.

Guy
There's more to do than focusing ur attention on gay... They don't even give a damn abt u or know u. Yeah, no one want any of their family to be LGBT i get it but guy focus on something else... U seems very interested in them, go look for them n start preaching to them n see how goes.
So far they don't bother me, even if na family
why should I care? M not in control of anyone life as far as u know what is right and wrong and wat you're doing... Then it doesn't bother me... No be me get ass na... It only left for u to train ur children the way u want it, stop blaming gay society... Home training matters

Sweetvie:
Guy
There's more to do than focusing ur attention on gay... They don't even give a damn abt u or know u. Yeah, no one want any of their family to be LGBT i get it but guy focus on something else... U seems very interested in them, go look for them n start preaching to them n see how goes.
So far they don't bother me, even if na family
why should I care? M not in control of anyone life as far as u know what is right and wrong and wat you're doing... Then it doesn't bother me... No be me get ass na... It only left for u to train ur children the way u want it, stop blaming gay society... Home training matters

The promotion and soft selling of the lifestyle to people as a norm is what people are against. In the west teachers, Disney, media and all sell lgbt lifestyle and not condemned so if you find yourself outside Nigeria you would have to home school your kids.

Many folks under 18, if you ask them they say it's okay and not bad. They are capturing the minds of young people to see it as cool and fine. Their sex education they give young minds and they include things like masturbation, man - man, woman -woman as viable options to heterosexual relationship.

Feminism, LGBTism, Globalization have roots in Satanism and their target is not me nor you. Not our generation but the coming one.

RedpillAnalyst:



The promotion and soft selling of the lifestyle to people as a norm is what people are against. In the west teachers, Disney, media and all sell lgbt lifestyle and not condemned so if you find yourself outside Nigeria you would have to home school your kids.

Many folks under 18, if you ask them they say it's okay and not bad. They are capturing the minds of young people to see it as cool and fine. Their sex education they give young minds and they include things like masturbation, man - man, woman -woman as viable options to heterosexual relationship.

Feminism, LGBTism, Globalization have roots in Satanism and their target is not me nor you. Not our generation but the coming one.

well, i must agree with you
But was thinking the op should focus more of his attention on something else... The problem in the country more than mere LGBT stuff.

Way back then, i went against homosexuality with every bit of me, advocated against it to the extent that I lost my voice. Then, i realised that i was only doing myself no good -drained all of my energies fighting a fight i can't win, so i decided to let them live.

What's the point fighting someone who's hell bent on doing what makes them happy? They say the sexuality is innate. I got some other issues to deal with.

elated177:


You really are advocating same-sex sexual relationships. Actually, homosexuality will always be one of the worst things that any human being will ever engage in. Do you know the kind and level of uncleanness associated with homosexuality? It wasn't for nothing that the Creator of the heavens, the earth, the seas and everything in them, the one and only true God, YHVH Almighty, called it detestable and abominable. It is a vile affection.

Spiritually sensitive persons, including those who engage in it, know that homosexuality pollutes the environment spiritually.

Aren't you one of the lgbtwhatever? Aren't you trying to do that here and failing miserably? With what are you going to "flaw" an unimpeachable fact? It is the eternal Covenant - eternal truth, if you prefer. The penis and the vagina are made for each other, as long as sex is concerned. The only hole that the penis is supposed to penetrate sexually is the vagina. Any other hole is unnatural and abnormal. Sticking the penis into the anus is an aberation.


Why didn't you refute the assertion that the anus is not a sex organ?

Why is it not possible for the penis of one male to open for the penis of another male to penetrate during the abominable act of homosexuality? Why do they resort to evacuation of excrement?

Why can't one female use her vagina to penetrate the vagina of the other female during their detestable sexual activity? Why do the still revert or resort to prosthetics and other penis-like objects?

Answer those questions?

If nature wanted two males to have sex with each other, males would have been equipped with both male and female sex organs - penis and vagina. The same with the females - both vagina and penis.

Why is it that between two people of the same sex who are in the abominable same-sex sexual relationship with each other, one acts like the member of the opposite sex? Do you have any explanation here, redpillanalyst?



How would you define an "accomplished" sex?



You haven't said anything.

As a saint, servant and messenger of the one and only true God, YHVH Almighty, the Creator and Father of all spirits, fellatió and cunnilingus are outside scripturally recommended sexual activities. We, the saint, servants and messengers, of YHVH Almighty, of Yahushua the Messiah, do not engage in such. Our mouths and tongues are not for such acts. Such acts are probably the inventions of demons.



Which people would say such? Who are the "they"?




I don't know what you are talking about?

I'm not advocating for any type of relationship, there's no need to throw the homo words on me.

Not all sexual acts turns to reproduction and not all sex acts include vanilla penetrative sex between a man and a woman.

Mouth Gig, anal intercourse and other non-penetrative sex between husband and wife is not condemned in most Abrahamic religion including Christianity and Islam.

Sister Deborah can swallow brother Samuel's Instruments if they are married and they are still bonafide Christians.

Even in Islam the case above is under what is called Makruh, i.e Not Forbidden ( not Haram) and not mandatory (not Halal). It is common sense and It is not just recommended married people who engage in MouthAction have not sinned.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2vmwHqVNE8

The penis is not meant exclusively for vagina.
That's doesn't mean I recommend other alternatives.

NeckingNgulping:
Way back then, i went against homosexuality with every bit of me, advocated against it to the extent that I lost my voice. Then, i realised that i was only doing myself no good -drained all of my energies fighting a fight i can't win, so i decided to let them live.

What's the point fighting someone who's hell bent on doing what makes them happy? They say the sexuality is innate. I got some other issues to deal with.

You realised how ridiculous you were fighting another for what they do with their priq, lol.

RedpillAnalyst:


I'm not advocating for any type of relationship, there's no need to throw the homo words on me.

Not all sexual acts turns to reproduction and not all sex acts include vanilla penetrative sex between a man and a woman.

You are just all over the place. You are advocating same-sex sexual relationship. You still do not get it. Sexual activity was designed exclusively for male and female and sanctioned scripturally in the union between a man and his wife. Any other kind of sexual activity that excludes the interaction between a male and a female is an aberation - an abnormal sexual relationship.

RedpillAnalyst:


Mouth Gig, anal intercourse and other non-penetrative sex between husband and wife is not condemned in most Abrahamic religion including Christianity and Islam.

Sister Deborah can swallow brother Samuel's Instruments if they are married and they are still bonafide Christians.

Chai! This one wants me to accept something that my Scriptures do not recommend. Ihe efu!

RedpillAnalyst:

Even in Islam the case above is under what is called Makruh, i.e Not Forbidden ( not Haram) and not mandatory (not Halal). It is common sense and It is not just recommended married people who engage in MouthAction have not sinned.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2vmwHqVNE8

Are you a Muslim?

RedpillAnalyst:


The penis is not meant exclusively for vagina.
That's doesn't mean I recommend other alternatives.

Of course the penis is mainly for urinating. However, as long as we are talking about sex, the vagina is the only hole that the penis is naturally designed to penetrate. Any other hole is wrongful usage of the penis. Finito.

RedpillAnalyst:



The promotion and soft selling of the lifestyle to people as a norm is what people are against. In the west teachers, Disney, media and all sell lgbt lifestyle and not condemned so if you find yourself outside Nigeria you would have to home school your kids.

Many folks under 18, if you ask them they say it's okay and not bad. They are capturing the minds of young people to see it as cool and fine. Their sex education they give young minds and they include things like masturbation, man - man, woman -woman as viable options to heterosexual relationship.

Feminism, LGBTism, Globalization have roots in Satanism and their target is not me nor you. Not our generation but the coming one.

Where did you get what you said above? Did it come from the same mind?

Sweetvie:
Guy
There's more to do than focusing ur attention on gay... They don't even give a damn abt u or know u. Yeah, no one want any of their family to be LGBT i get it but guy focus on something else... U seems very interested in them, go look for them n start preaching to them n see how goes.
So far they don't bother me, even if na family
why should I care? M not in control of anyone life as far as u know what is right and wrong and wat you're doing... Then it doesn't bother me... No be me get ass na... It only left for u to train ur children the way u want it, stop blaming gay society... Home training matters

How many threads of mine have you gone through?

NeckingNgulping:
Way back then, i went against homosexuality with every bit of me, advocated against it to the extent that I lost my voice. Then, i realised that i was only doing myself no good -drained all of my energies fighting a fight i can't win, so i decided to let them live.

What's the point fighting someone who's hell bent on doing what makes them happy? They say the sexuality is innate. I got some other issues to deal with.

That is where you are wrong? I am not fighting anyone. Homosexuality is neither the birthright nor the inheritance of anyone. It is not like anyone who condemns the abominable act of homosexuality is killing anyone. You need to go through more of the threads that border on homosexuality. It is a case of "he who has ears, let him hear".

elated177:



How many threads of mine have you gone through?

Lol
Most of it
Which church do you attend, mind me asking?

Sweetvie:
Lol
Most of it
Which church do you attend, mind me asking?

I don't think you have. If you had, you wouldn't have said what you said above.

I am church. Should a church attend church?

elated177:




I am church. Should a church attend church?

I like u
You're very funny
No, church can't attend church but church can bend down for church