NewStats: 3,265,078 , 8,185,606 topics. Date: Friday, 13 June 2025 at 11:59 AM 2y2s70

Kyhuani:



I'm making money. You may focus on the errors. Not my biz

WarHammer2000:


I just read the first article and I agree with Kyuhani that it leaves much to be desired.

The write-up is unnecessarily verbose (too much big English used sometimes out of context) and the meanings are unclear in several instances.

I also spotted some grammatical errors although not too many. The spellings were correct but many words were just misused. Moreover, the presentation could be improved upon and the readability too. It just feels too mechanical.

The writer needs to understand that Grammarly is a machine and not a human. It can correct errors but it's suggestions are often too robotic and make reading difficult since it can't feel.

to balance Grammarly with your human judgement. Read your article with neutral eyes and check if e dey sweet or not.

Honestly, if I don't blame the employer for rejecting this but I do believe that the writer deserves some compensation for his time and data at least. We can only keep getting better.

Kyhuani:



My Lise isn't dependent on your negatives and narratives

Kyhuani:



I've found more than enough. Get lost hypocrite

Dvea:


I really don't feel like arguing with anyone this weekend but....

First off, I said it reads like an academic work, and it needs to be reworked because it's difficult to read... but of course, that's one you did not read. The entire write-up looks like a song of the eighties only because he chose to write it with big words and unnecessary grammar. No simplification at all. That doesn't mean it doesn't have flow. He had a structure in mind; if you read it from a neutral ground, it is an article with a point. The question here (which, by the way, isn't what you were complaining about or which you spoke about) is whether the work is for a blog or some academic writing. You complained that the work is bad and makes no sense, which, as I said, fundamentally, it is good. You didn't mention if this was for a blog. You only asked to judge the work. You said to judge if the work makes sense. It does. It's just written in an unnecessary educational manner. The work makes sense; there were no grammar issues that I could pick up. The only points I picked and stated were big grammar and repetition in the middle.

And I stand by the point you could have simply told him to rewrite if it wasn't the tone and style you wanted and then decide if he can meet your desired tone. I mentioned payment because you both did. He complained you didn't pay, and you complained that you wouldn't pay for the type of work.

Your problem is you forget you brought your argument to the public, and the public will use the information they have to judge. It is not my business to question both of you about your agreement . All I did was give an answer when you asked for a public judgment.

Besides, most writers had to be honed. I've worked with tens of writers off and on this platform. Many of them start off weird, and you need to fine-tune them to fit your tone and standard. If you've searched for writers, you'll know not many are outrightly good. The most important thing is how is their tenses. Can they read a topic and understand how to write it? Do they understand the fundamentals of non-fiction writing from fiction?

Those are the core points; everything else can be managed. Maybe it's me, but I haven't found a writer who doesn't have one noticeable issue when it comes to sentence structuring and presentation. If you plan to say goodbye to everyone coming your way, you'll be searching for long. And by the looks of your posts across the platform, it seems you have been searching for long.

But no, you just chose to spend this Saturday evening in anger and argument.

Dvea:


And that's how you've sold yourself as a problematic person to work with. Have a fantastic weekend.

Kyhuani:




Dude. Copy and paste the contents so forum can read

Kyhuani:



Paste the contents here let the forum judge it

Kyhuani:



You wrote a 600 words piece and it was flooded with errors. Am I the cause of your problems ?

FoxyFlow:
Argue all you want but there is a reason a lot of great minds left this place.

Divepen1:
I did a second version that ended not to happily.

The prompts for that one was slightly different. I just became angry because I just finished arguing with someone outside Nairaland about how we always want sad endings in anything Nigerian literature. Only to come here to meet another statement in that line.