NewStats: 3,265,287 , 8,186,259 topics. Date: Saturday, 14 June 2025 at 09:27 AM 38703x

6382y

Luciii's Posts 2j2f29

Luciii's Posts

(1) (of 1 pages)

Luciii: 2:41pm On Jan 29
saphiere:
Please I want every meaningful Nigerian to go on X and Instagram and unfollow 2baba. I just did.
Let's boycott his songs as well.

Thanks. #OneLove
My post is directed to meaningful Nigerians not hoodlums.

When it comes to useless stuff like this thats when the energy in you daft Nigerians rises, energy to meddle in other people's private lives and affairs and mundane nonsense. When it comes to making a statement or taking a stand for useful causes that would better the shit hole u live in... no where to be found. See e halitosis infested mouth like boycott 2baba. Useless citizens.
Luciii: 3:12pm On Jan 15
Ok so its not really free, but would need only about 15mins of your time. If #500 - #1500 isn't too small for you drop your phone numbers below. I'm conducting a survey and need willing participants to undertake. Preferably participants should have experience with AI and Adult Content.
Luciii: 3:00pm On Jan 15
Ok so its not really free, but would need only about 15mins of your time. If #500 - #1500 isn't too small for you drop your phone numbers below. I'm conducting a survey and need willing participants to undertake. Preferably participants should have experience with AI and Adult Content.
Luciii: 8:57pm On Oct 27, 2024
sonmvayina:


You have not provided the evidence that he existed..

I am still waiting..

Please wait just a little bit ๐Ÿ˜…
Luciii: 8:34pm On Oct 27, 2024
sonmvayina:


Are you saying that no body who actually saw him wrote anything down..

So sad, and the earliest anybody heard the name jesus was actually after the NICea council.
Does it not mean that it was that council that actually invented him?

No matter how ionate you are, jesus is not a historical figure...that is why it is all faith based. Not knowledge....

It is a thing of faith..
If it was true, nobody' will forc you to believe it....

All these tangents and mental gymnastics just to escape providing a source ๐Ÿ˜…. Maybe if you had bothered educating urself you would have known that yes we dont have first hand s. like i said i don't particularly care if you believe or not so you "crossing/ swinging over to my side" is not my concern, that would be a fools errand. Just wanted to show you were talking unverifiable baseless rubbish. The evidence, sources, scholars and communities are all there in my prev comments, you suddenly getting selective amnesia cause you couldn't refute them or provide yours to cointer them just makes the coward hat fit perfect.

Only few comments above you were happy to provide sources when you ignorantly and confidently thought it ed your claim with Bart, Carrier and Humprhey's(this is still funny). When it was found that the few sources you managed to come up with where rubbish and contradicted you suddenly "can't provide sources for a negative claim" even though you're clearly making an assertions all over the place.๐Ÿ˜… Typical flat earther and religious folk energy. Not one of your claims/assertions could you provide a source, consensus, evidence or just a general scholarly perspective for.

From the assertion that Jesus did not exist, to Ezra wrote the torah, to enlil/enki = jacob/esau or the new rubbish up there that no one heard of Jesus until the Nicea council, not one. Or are they're all "negative claims" ergo you wouldn't provide? What a Joker. At least anyone reading this knows you're clearly talking out ur ass. The irony of the staement "Educate yourself" is def something. Knew you would take the cowards way out by going on a tangent.
Luciii: 4:12pm On Oct 27, 2024
sonmvayina:


When you are ready to provide evidence for the historicity of Jesus let me know..

Can't you get what somebody who actually met him and what they wrote about him.
Is it not funny that the "son of God" made an entrance and nobody noticed it. Somebody the authors said his ministry went as far as Syria..common man..

Evidence has been provided, write your own journal and peer reviewed paper to the academic community disputing their consensus as wrong and prove said(your) ramblings of an anonymous nobody on the internet against established reputable scholars so we adopt it as fact. No?!๐Ÿ˜
Luciii: 3:41pm On Oct 27, 2024
sonmvayina:


Which evidences did they consider?

Every body knows that the evidence in Josephus work is fake as it was Christians who had it and added those stuff..
All the others are too far to be considered evidence...

I see you trying so hard...simply because you don't want to accept the fact that you have lived your whole life believing a lie...and probably wasted your whole money on it..

๐Ÿ˜…Typical empty vessel, all bark no bite, i still don't see any sources or evidences to back your claim just deflecting and going on tangents cause u've been caught talking nonsense and can't back it up. I purposefully mentioned the fact there were 2 mentions of Jesus in Josephus antiquities, the second, testimonuim flavonuim was a later interpolation by Christians to prove Jesus' divinity and is well know by scholars as an interpolation, the first mention is proven and legit as shown by every scholar mentioned in my previous post.

But u've got no evidence for you own dross claims so you had to find a way to deflect, by zeroing in to try and find faults in one out of the numerous citations, evidence and scholary consensuses which, just unfortunately happens to be verifiably countered by numerous scholars ๐Ÿ˜…. No source just words, ive told you i don't even believe in the bible but you try to deflect making it seem like i do simply beacuse i have common sense to put my bias aside and recognize fact, im not religous, my comment history is there ๐Ÿ˜‚.

Just as there are morons out there who believe the earth is flat, we know what is fact and are ok with their delusions. Its just awesome though to demonstrate they are talking baseless nonsense without any verifiable proofs. Provide sources, evidence, scholarly backing and consensus for your ludicrous baseless claims or cowardly tuck your tails between your legs and go on a tangent itting you were talking unverifiable baselsess nonsense. Over to you!๐Ÿ˜

.
Luciii: 1:38pm On Oct 27, 2024
sonmvayina:


I am still waiting for your evidence on the historicity of Jesus...
I will not stop chasing you till you present the evidences you talked about..

(Fucking Nairaland deleting my comments for adding sources. wth! Ill add em as a pic instead)

...Even if you want to go by concensus by countries. There is not a single country on earth that i know of with a consensus that Jesus never existed: see attached image.

Also the 2015 survey of scholars in the field of New Testament studies conuninformed the Society For Biblical Literature SBL, reported 93% of respondents believed Jesus existed historically, 6% were uncertain, 1% did not believe Jesus existed.

What evidence did these reputable scholars with years of experience studying this the world over, examine to come to the conlusion and consensus they did more than 80 years ago?! One, the synoptic gospels themselves and before you say it can't be used as evidence this is what the legendary Dr Bart which you cited had to say "To dismiss the Gospels from the historical record is neither fair nor scholarly." Another is the Pauline epistles which were even written before the gospels and i mean the actual 7 Pauline letters out of the attributed 13.

The interesting thing is they analysed external evidence to corroborate and add to the evidence of the new testament texts which led to the consensus. Jewish historian Jospehus in his book Antiquities, that specifically mentions Jesus twice and his crucifixion by Pontius Pilate. Roman historian Tacitus In his Annals mentions Jesus' execution by Pontius Pilate and refers to the existence of Christians in Rome, whom he describes as followers of โ€œChristus.โ€

Add another Roman historian Suetonius: In The Lives of the Caesars, Suetonius mentions disturbances in Rome โ€œat the instigation of Christusโ€. This is nor even considering Eusebius as he's controversial or the historical context of other messianic claimants around the same time period. and contextual evidence from the documented matyrdom of followers and the rapid spread of christianity.

Then more than 80 years later after the historicity had been established, one psuedo informed, anonymous random on the internet who can't even get his references right comes to state otherwise all cause he consumed some half baked info from garbage youtube sources,ย  when experts already had this settled before the birth of his parents?!. What an uninformed close minded joker. I'm not even a christain but common sense says facts are facts. Over to you, lets see your "sources" and "evidences" and the academic community that backs it.ย  lol!

1 Like

(1) (of 1 pages)

(Go Up)

Sections: How To . 33
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or s on Nairaland.