That guy you are quoting doesn't know one bit of what the op was about
He is totally clueless
Chai,...it's sad you just sit and make assumptions. You know how many papers have published. You are just a blockhead. I have to reply you so that you will not think you are wise and i have to stop here so that i won't be foolish like you.
If you do not understand what I wrote you would have asked questions. I will never trade words with someone like you because we are never on the same wavelength. Such dirty pig like you...tueh!!!!!
This thread is to document all my results form 100 to 500lvl so I can track my progress and see if I'm doing better or worse.
Semester GPA: 4.40
Current CGPA: 4.40
I'm currently in my 100 level 2nd semester and 2nd semester results aren't out yet but I think my GPA is still alright( I technically don't have a CGPA yet). The result above is only for my first semester.
I think it's ok for my first semester but I'm hoping to break into a 4.5 real soon.
Why not just go and do yours and bring it here instead of using all your energy to castigate the guy. You even went extra miles to tell him he wasn't born when you'd started using data. Please do you know the guy or you're the one that gave birth to him? Nothing one no go see in this faceless forum.
Am sorry sir....i will go and remove where i said he wasn't born when i started using data.
Obinoscopy:
Regression ke? Bro do you know what you are saying?
My sample wasn't skewed to favour anyone. Like I said earlier, I used simple random sampling. I generated random numbers using excel. This means every polling units had equal chance of being selected. I really hope you understand Statistics.
Bro, i am telling you what you did is a lie. It's quite sad to realise you lie as pertaining to selecting the samples randomly using Microsoft excel...such pettiness, i don't tolerate.
Stop the grammatical gymnastics and use your senses to rebuff his results. You can consult the IREV portal using any sample you so desire to drive home your point.
Obinoscopy:
I've done mine. And I'm 95% confident. Meaning if you repeat this research 100 times, you will get something similar to my result 95 times. Scientist like Carl Friedrich Gauss have demonstrated this already. But if you are still in doubt, perhaps you can do yours and tell me what you got.
Oh boy, you have to it it that the samples you used are skewed to favour Obi. If e sure for you, use another sample set and run the test, result will shock you your self.
If i begin to analyse your results and methods, you will be amased by the standard error in your result. Come alive, stop sleeping.
Obinoscopy:
Statistics is all about estimate bro. I never said my results are 100% accurate. But I'm 95% confident in my estimates.
My sample is a representative sample because I made sure all 23 LGAs were sampled. Also the PUs from each of the LGA samples were in the exact proportion of the PUs in the actual LGAs. So the issue of skewness or kurtosis does not arise here.
95%
So 5% is the margin of error.
Why not carry out another research and use another sample to test rather than assume your estimate is accurate
However I noticed some discrepancies in the result for Rivers State and decided to probe further. Again I used simple random sampling and multistage sampling to ensure that every polling unit had equal chance of being selected. I used a sample size of 198. I got the sample size using the formula:
Sample Size = S/(1+S/N)
Where S = z2*p*(1-p)/e2
And where z is the z-score which is 1.96 for a 95% confidence level
p is the population proportion of those who voted in Rivers State which is 15.6%
e is the margin of error which we take as 5%
N is the population size (total number of polling units in Rivers State) which is 6866.
The result is mind boggling.
RESULT
So after collating the results sheets from randomly selected 198 polling units, APC got a total of 4637 votes, LP got 8129 votes, NNPP got 47 votes and PDP got 3578 votes. So LP (and not APC as we were meant to believe) got the majority of votes followed by APC, then PDP and finally NNPP. Infact LP got more than 50% of the vote such that if you combine APC and PDP votes its still less than LP’s votes. This corroborates Peter Obi claim that he got 50% of the votes in Rivers State.
This means LP won more than 12 States (13 States or perhaps more) and APC won less than 12 States (11 States or perhaps less). With this result, I begin to wonder if there are other States with this kind of glaring discrepancies.
Bursted!!!!
Samples have already been determined apriori, so claims that you used a random sample is a lie, you know that.
If you understand statistics so well as you claimed, you will understand that what you just generated is an estimate not the accurate figure.
It's also important to get a representative sample rather than get a sample that is skewed so that your analysis can follow a normal distribution. Else, what you just generated will have standard deviation greater than zero, skewness greater than zero, and kurtosis less than 3 or greater than 3.
I will like to ask the confidence interval for this your result?
What is the standard error?
It is an estimate and we cannot say for sure how accurate your estimate is. I believe your data is skewed to places where peter obi got majority of his votes.
JasonScoolari: God's will Akpabio; A man loved when he was a governor under the PDP, did tremendous work at Akwa Ibom, earn a spot as one of the finest politician out of the Creeks of the Niger Delta,
He is now a useless THIEF under the APC, he is being disgraced, embarrassed, demystified subjected to mockery and rendered an Internally Displaced Politician both in the State and Federal level.
Now, EFCC are chasing him like a thief at Ochanja market in Onitsha. They are gradually stripping him nakked, grabbed him by his balls and taken everything from him.
He will soon get HIV when the demonic APC are done with him.
Don't you think something is wrong with your reasoning....you praised a thief and also defend against his arrest?...are you well like this?
OriOko88:
Very apt. Out of five that were involved,only two made it out alive,other three got drowned
Moral: Don't ever imitate others. Follow ur instinct and use descretion.
You are basing your conclusion on a wrong premise, one of the results of this pitfall is an invalid argument.
There were five(5) that formed the G5, prior to election they decided to follow who so ever they want, wike and makinde followed Tinubu, others followed Obi. This is fact.
Some other factors contributed to their loss, one of them is bad governance apart from the earlier stated facts. Ofcourse, this paved way for the person of father Alia loved and trusted by his own people(Benue). Get facts, not incomplete shit. I just did a deep analysis for you, not just surface scratching.