NewStats: 3,264,023 , 8,182,312 topics. Date: Monday, 09 June 2025 at 10:35 AM 3y3p6v

amadivv:
Ukrainians strikes only military targets , Russian retaliates, boom civilian's life's and infrastructures are lost .people are here drooling and masturbating on the news. Some of u guys need serious mental help.

Ukraine doesn't strike only military targets. Ukraine bombed a beach in Crimea. Ukraine bombed a railway track and killed 8 civilians last week. Ukraine killed several civilians in Kursk. I don't know where you got the idea that Ukraine doesn't attack civilians, maybe Western politicians.

Just like Israel, Russia is only going after military targets and any civilian that dies is only being used as human shields.

Who are these random twitter s you are quoting. Are these verified sources?

Gbadebo19:
High-resolution footage shared by @Avivector confirms damage to Russian strategic aviation at Olenya Airbase — showing 4 destroyed Tu-95 bombers and an An-12 transport aircraft.

Breaking: 3 Israeli soldiers killed in Jabalia.

LOL. But I heard Hamas has been defeated. LMAO!

This will have the same effect on Russians as Oct 7 had on Israel. It will make them more hardened to fight more brutally.
also, be specific about what you mean by world. Do you mean the 30% world population represented by NATO countries?

Obrigardo:
I think the world would just have had it with Russia if they continue this war.
It doesn't make sense anymore, anymore than the world would just see killer putin as a lunatic.

Just give up!

Jonathan:

Lol
So Palestine is made up but Israel is not?

Very daft guy.

JuanDeDios:

Russia rejected it - and continued to bomb maternity wards and restaurants. So what should they do other than show Putin that Zelenskyy is his father?

Why are you not talking about Ukraine attacking a enger train, bombing a beach filled with civilians and killed civilians in Kursk.

WritterNg:
⚡Zelensky:

The destruction of Russian aircraft will force Russia to sit down at the negotiating table.

The SBU operation proved that Ukraine can deliver sensitive strikes, and this strengthens the security of all of Europe.

This guy is suffering from serious delusion. Ukraine thought Kurk would give them leverage during negotiators too.Howdid that end?

MERCHANDISER:

Bro Russia has last more than 1.2m men in this war....Putin made a mistake from the beginning,he was so lenient with Ukrainians 😃

1.3 million! Where did you get that figure?

Ukraine attacked a paswenger train in Russia. Ukraine killed civillians in Kursk during their stupid invasion and attavked a beach in Crimea. Are you stupid or just suffering from amnesia?

Botragelad:

Quit crying boy. Did Ukraine ever invade Russia and massacre civilians? Didn’t think so.

What even is Palestine? A made-up fantasy land that never existed in history. When was there ever a Palestinian state? Who ruled it? What was its capital, its currency, its borders? None of that exists because it’s a fake narrative pushed by Arab settlers who stole the land and now play victim.

Why does no historical map or empire ever show it as a sovereign nation?
How come every time someone digs in the region, they find Jewish history, not "Palestinian" heritage? 😂😂

"Palestine" is just a modern propaganda term for Arab invaders who hate Israel’s existence. Funny how that works.

Just like Kursk, this latest attack will not affect the outcome of the war except to prolong it and increase the destruction and human suffering in it. Kursk was eventually retaken with massive losses for Ukraine. All damaged aircraft will eventually be replaced but can Ukraine ever get back Crimea, Donetk nad Luhansk? Can Ukraine get back it's 400,000 missing soldiers including the 50k destroyed in Kursk?

Even for NATO, it is clear that America cannot wield power on the scale they once did as a new alliance is forming. It may take a long time, the West can delay it with their media narratives and spy games but the western decline is sure. That fact alone, gives me joy.

Hitler invaded the USSR with 3 million troops, 600 thousand vehicles and was still defeatedAt the start of 2022, the Ukrainian military had 196,600 active-duty personnel, which, according to the 3:1 force ratio rule, would have required an invasion of 590,000 Russian personnel. Instead, the Russians planned an invasion with 190,000 personnel, actually smaller than the combined Ukrainian armed forces.

What this information tells is that Russia actually never planned a full invasion but rather a strategic attack. The Russians themselves have a listed their objectives which never included taking over and governing the entire Ukraine but Western politicians and media manufactured the narrative if Kiev in 3 days. From the beginning, Russia's assumption was that the Ukrainian regime was scared and would negotiate fast and planned the operation according to this assumption. This assumption is Russia's greatest error in the war.

Obedience40:
A

What rubbish is this?? So all putin has done in Ukraine he has done with a soft hand?? Can you read what you wrote??

A putin that just last week carried the largest recorded bombardment of the capital keiv with drone and ballistics missiles, A Putin which has initiated the largest invasion in Europe not seen since the hay days of WW2, He has targeted Energy facilities, civilian facilities, schools, transport systems, and hospitals and his currently holding on to large hectares of Ukrainian land. Go check the civilians casualties incurred by Ukraine during the course of the war. Here, you are trying very hard to downplay Putin's war efforts in Ukraine, implying that he is showing restraints. Well I guess the Ukrainians who have been faced with constant attacks from Russia for over 3 years would sleep better knowing that Putin according to you has been dealing with them with a light hand.

One of your fellow Russian friends was even implying that Russia should declare war on Ukraine, like the one being fought for over 3 years is a movie.

Is it until he uses nukes before we can tag it "hard hand"? There are no cards, Putin can play per conventional warfare, All the modern weapons of Russia have all been used in battles in Ukraine. Take your L and move on, mate.

P.s Russia invaded Ukraine not the other way round, How did the country which was invaded suddenly become the aggressor.

I agree with you. So why is Zelensky crying up and down and why is the Western media complaining that Russia is wicked. Let's leave Ukraine alone to deal with russia na.

Simeonjoe1:


Ukraine clearly targets military airbases with high success rate. Russia should do the same.
BTW nothing Russia won do wey dey no wa do,
Ukraine no send their papa again.

If no be nuclear they'll both keep going tooth for tat, Yeah that's what the paper mighty Russia has been reduced to, a war of attrition with Ukraine, with some sprinkle of US .

Putin will not react heavy handed like the West. that is what they expect so they can justify their narrative that Russia is the aggressor. Russia is fightinga military, political and economic war and has to win on all fronts. They still need the backing of China and other strong economies as they forge a stronger international alliance to take over from western hegemony.

Raynald:
Am seriously waiting Putin reaction
This was really disgraceful
Will him react harshly or stick to his plan
I want to know if this man can be influenced too

And somebody needs to be sacked,that fsb boss is failing big time

I usually notice that every major Ukrainian achievement in this war is usually timed with accompanying losses in other areas. This recent attack may be just timely to mask their heavy losses on the real front from the western audience so as to keep the myth alive. Russia has taken numerous settlements recently and is creating a buffer in Kharkiv and Sumy.

This war is more complex than meets the eye and I believe the global south will continue to see more reason why they should back Russia. The Western might is still huge but you don't play all your cards at once in a war of attrition.

LordAdam16:


Go back to pages on this thread after every calamitous Ukraine attack and it's some version of "sky is falling", "Russia is in trouble", "NATO has hidden cards".

For the umpteenth time, these are the very real costs of Putin's soft approach.
This is not the first hit, nor will it be the last.
Putin and the Russian establishment are resolute on sticking to this path.
For all of its drawbacks, it has been wildly successful.
Attacks of this nature are calibrated by the West to have the exact predictable effect you see on this thread.

Go over the facts of this War.
Ukraine is done.
No air force. No navy. No air defense. A depleted army. Infrastructure is under severe strain. Its backers are exhausted.
This is all they have up their sleeves. Incisive sabotage. That's it.

Moskva. Kursk. Dugina and other assassinations. Refineries and air bases attacked.
One constant remains.
Ukraine cannot take back lost territory.
This is the stage where Russia has to bob and weave to run down the clock.

The faux outrage and meltdown is comical.

-Lord

WritterNg:


You're the one ranting but I'm the one in pain??

Give it a few days and you'll run back to your hole, when the retaliatory strikes begin.

We've been there before. Nothing new.

Very soon. Media headlines will be filled with stories of Russia's wickedness had how Russia is the aggressor after retaliatory strikes.

My brother. Did you know the tribe that was living on the land of your father 2,000 years ago? What if their descendants came back and tell you to split your village in 2?

There was no reasonable need for Zionism except the urgent need to pacify the Jews by the western powers who had persecuted them for centuries. Why was Zionism championed from Europe and not from Palestine at that time? Why is it that it is the Ashkenazi Jews from Europe who are at the top of the Israeli society today, discriminating against blacks and Asian Jews?

I mentioned the story of the Bantu tribes, who migrated from present day South Eastern Nigeria around a thousand years ago, at a time not even up to how long the Hebrews have disappeared. Mind you, some people on the Mambilla Plateau still speak those languages in Nigeria. Imagine if the bantu tribes suddenly tell the Igbos and the middle beltans to split Igbo land and central Nigeria?

Gbadebo19:

Exactly where you have no point. How can Palestinians say people can't claim their father's house just because they have been away despite the fact their remnants still remain. Violence is definitely bound to happen that way and the only solution is to divide it which they rejected. C'est finis.
If 50,000 of Kemi Badenoch come back to Nigeria, they will still claim their ancestral house or land as long as it was never legally sold to anyone else. Anyone occupying that land or house will have to vacate or better still, a division will occur. C'est finis.
Any other thing is simple gibberish which will only bring war.

Like I said earlier, the violence of the Palestinians is not the action, it is a reaction to their oppression by the Jews. Mind you, there are also Christians in Palestine and they are in the struggle as well. Nelson Mandela was considered a terrorist before he won the hearts of the western powers.

The reasons for not taking in Palestinian refugees has nothing to do with why they should be oppressed.
There are different middle eastern states with different agendas for Palestine based on what benefits their leaders. Saudi, Qatar, Egypt, and Jordan all have selfish agendas concerning Palestine. Even Iran is not altogether innocent just that it is willing to risk a great deal to protect the Palestinians despite belonging to a different sect of Islam.

Gbadebo19:

Don't say things I didn't say. I never said I was persecuted by Muslims. Let's be guided.
To your other point about if a Muslim sees what is happening in Gaza, your point will only hold water if they are not the real criminal hiding under the cloak "victims of genocide."
We have seen women and children as suicide bombers, the same group who anyone will want to protect.
In places like that Gaza you talk of, give the Muslims a breathing space and you'll be sorry you did. Israel knows exactly what they are doing and the Arab world themselves know what Hamas and Palestinians seek to achieve.
Have you asked yourself why none of the Arab countries is willing to take the Palestinians as refugees? Have you asked why they don't even donate aid to them. Everyone knows that Hamas is simply a terror tool used by some groups to try to wipe out Israel.

Let me tell you, most people in all Abrahamicb religions will rejoice when misfirtune happens to people of the opposing religion. Its the way we have been brainwashed since birth. Uou have been persecuted by Muslims and so every Muslim you see is evil. So also is a Moslim who sees whats happening in Iraq, Afghanistan and Gaza.

Gbadebo19:

Contempt for over 1 billion people? Their population doesn't matter. It is their fundamental ideas that matter. There is a reason why Yoruba people call Islam "esin imole" which means "religion of tough ideology." Even if they are 1 trillion, as long as their fundamental ideas are about killing and killing, it is a no no for me.
You don't preach and tell me what a religion I practiced for over 20 years teaches. You are just being tactically bred for their sinister mission or should I say being brainwashed to see something good about it. I practiced it for over 20 years before finding my bearings. Get lost!!!
And I will say it, you are just seeing the extremists alone and that's why you are mentioning Boko Haram et al, those ones who are not Boko Haram will kill another jew if the slightest of reason arises.
We have them in Nigeria. They killed Deborah Samuel for what? The abuja woman evangelist was killed for what? What was the offense of southern Kaduna people where the majority was xtians? And these are who you claim are being labeled? The above incidents were perpetrated by the same people you would call "moderate"
What nonsense are you even saying? People who kill themselves for mere disagreement on what they claim their own prophet said or didn't say? Salafists will kill Sunni and Sunni will kill Shia. If they are doing that, why won't they kill any other religion? Why are you now hypocritically and sickly worried that they are labeled, it is something they've been doing for thousands of years.

SMH. Go back to your history books. The Jews were ruled by the Romans and it was the Romans under Titus that finally destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD. Islam and the great Arab conquest did not start until 5 centuries later. When Islam spread through conquest, there were several populations that were not originally Arabic but became Muslims. 2,000 years is an incredibly long time, longer than the existence of either Benin or Oyo empire, longer than the existence of Yoruba or Igbo as ethnic groups. Why is anybody holding on to something from 2,000 years ago. It is just simple brainwashing and you lot keep falling for it. Enjoy it.

sainttwist1:
😂😂😂😂😂😂 you need to stop this...... your emotions dey betray you. Your religion your problem, I don't care.

The land does not belong to the Palestinians/arabs, they won it through conquest and in 1948 they lost the land through the same conquest, simple.

One thing I noticed about you is that you don't understand a thing you are saying....... maybe you are doing it for political correctness or maybe afflictions or you heard from someone/someone told you so........
Your knowledge of history and real world is somehow......

Thank God you know for every action there is same or greater amount of reaction.........the situation in Gaza is as a result of Palestinians/arab actions on October 7.

And if you really hate oppression, we have Muslims in china, christians in Pakistan, christians in northern Nigeria (that is even close to you), alphabet people in Arab/Muslim/Russia countries etc go and fight for their rights.

😂😂😂😂😂😂you hate oppression yet na only one set of people you see

Thank you for finally revealing yourself. it you have nothing but vile contempt for over 1 billion people on earth.

I do agree that islam as it is practiced, has a lot of reforming to do, just like Chritianity was hundreds of years ago. I am not a religious person and just believe that these Abrahamic religions are used to brainwash us but I still respect humanity, whichever religion you adhere to. You cannot pre-determine that anybody who is a Muslim is evil and therefore, deserves no justice. With that principle, you are already an extremist. Period.

Gbadebo19:

Whenever anything has to do with the word "peace", Never mention a Muslim. Both the extremists and the so called "moderate" are all birds of a feather. The ones called "moderate" are mere terrorists in sleeper mode waiting for activation. We have many of them on this thread claiming to be "moderate."

Thank you soo much. I am shocked that the same people who are repulsed by the horrors of Islamic fundamentalism are justifying Jewish supremacy.

I refuse to be brainwashed by religion.

FoolishBoy419:
It amazes me that people are still arguing over these Abrahamic religions. They were all fabricated by egocentric, barbaric mass murderers to justify their tyranny. The Jews founded it to justify their mass murder of an indigenous population and take over their lands. The Christians used it to keep their population in darkness and to consolidate power. Islam was also founded to unify Arabia and take over surrounding territories.

The thing is that while Christians eventually adopted a reformed, pussified watered down version of their faith after thousands had been burnt to death, crucified, stoned to death, and beheaded, a great chunk of Muslims insist on maintaining Muhammad's legacy of unwarranted violence and oppression against disbelievers. Muslims would tell you that their prophet fought for self-defense, but that's just lies. All 'peaceful and defensive verses'' in the Quran, most of which were 'revealed' in Mecca when Muhammad had no power, were subsequently abbrogated by the violent ones that came in Media. By Islamic law, anybody that doesn't believe in Allah is to be killed although Jews and Christians can be kept in humiliation and be made to pay taxes. Even with such a condition, Muhammad kicked 2 Jewish tribes out of Media and and got rid of the third one by beheading all their adult males (by adult, I mean those with pubic hair) and enslaving their women and children. Joshua and David did the same thing against innocent people.

I'm sorry if this offends you, but this is the painful truth. I am tired of these nonsensical religious arguments. This is not a one-sided thing. Muslims, Christians, and Jews have been taught that their blood is more precious than those of other mortals, so they struggle to recognize injustice unless they are at the receiving end.

Anybody that goes past the 20th century to justify Israel's actions is irrational and can best be described as a dumb religious extremist. What we are seeing in Palestine is a bunch of Jewish supremacists oppressing and terrorizing a defenceless population and we have 'intellectuals' here who think their morals are superior to those of Boko Haram justifying their actions.

Please take your fallacies elsewhere. You can decide to be a Muslim hater or anything you like, I don't hate anybody, I only hate oppression. I detest Islamic fundamentalists like Boko Haram as much as I detest Zionists. They are both terrorists as far as I am concerned. I don't even care how you see me, that is your business.

Now, let me address your assertions:

1. Please rephrase that term, ' the land does not belong to them'. The Hebrews have not been on that land as a race for 2,000 years. there have been Jews there, and they deserve equal rights as much as the Muslim Arabs too. Mind you, both the Jews and Muslims of Palestine were called Arabs prior to Zionism. It was not the fault of the Arabs that the Hebrew state was destroyed. The Hebrew kingdom was not the first kingdom to be destroyed in ancient times. Why is none of us whose ancestors migrated from somewhere in ancient times not returning to that place to displace the inhabitants? We are in modern times, and the era of military conquests for its sake is over. The Palestinians didn't make international laws, it's the western powers that are violating it for the Jews.

2. Now, to discuss who the land originally belonged to, it was not even the Hebrews originally. It belonged to an ancient people called Canaanites whom the israelites of old massacred in the Bible. Now, there are some African tribes like the Ijebu, who claim descent from these ancient Canaanites that the Hebrews destroyed. Is it justified for the Ijebus to go back and claim Jerusalem?

3. Oct 7 was not an action, it was a reaction to oppression. I hate Hamas' tactics but it was as a result of continous oppression in the hands of the Israeli state. We once had a more peaceful Fatah which Israel weakened so that Hamas would take over. Netanyahu himself said it is better they continue to Hamas against Fatah to jeopardise the 2 state solution. What is happening is a war of conquest being ed by the powers that be. I want to imagine what would happen when power changes hands in the future.

sainttwist1:
maybe you just choose to ignore the word "compromise" and picked the "agreed"....…I just want to debunked what you said about the India and Pakistan


And you claiming to be a Christian......😂😂😂
Brother you need to stop the lamba. This is a faceless forum, anyone can claim anything. I am not trying to portray you as a Muslim defender, you already are. Also I don't have problem with any religion, your religion is your problem. Christianity, Islam or anything your serve, na your problem.


The Gaza situation was caused by some greedy, intolerant, dumb Arab/Muslim. The piece of land does not belong to the arabs in the first place they won it through conquest.
The land was named Palestine by the Romans just to spite the Jews for God sake and you are defending what is not adding up with fake example.

The same Palestinians that no other Arab/Muslim countries want is what you are defending. The same Arabs/Muslims that cause their suffering. The same Palestinians that celebrate Oct 7 like winning a world cup, the same Palestinians that were living on a free mode before Oct 7. Blame the arabs for what is happening in Gaza stop blaming the Jews, the Jew have the right like any other countries to defend themselves at anytime and anyplace.

I am not portraying you as anything but with some of what you have said on this thread it is clear to the blind your affiliation, bro you are trying to rewrite history just to favour one side. And I believe people like you are only against oppression when it is not in your favour

If they don't live in peace, whose fault is it. Why were the immigrant Zionists carrying out terrorist attacks?

when you want to oppress a people, you first turn them to a villain. Muslims are hated world over because of Islamic fundametalism. So, the moment you label these people as terrorists, nobody will believe they deserve any justice even if they were right. Till today, Jewish settlers still continue to kill unharmed Palestinian Arabs both Muslims and Christians. Am I lying?

Gbadebo19:

I wouldn't even bother to argue anything more with you. The violence that has been happening since time immemorial is what you claim started at the turn of the 20th century. They have never lived together in peace and I repeat, they have never lived together in peace. Go back to primary school pls.

Please forget about what the Arabs from other countries wanted. Since the dawn of history, mankind has been selfish and the greater part of the predicament stemmed from the treachery of their Arab brothers from neighbouring states. Both Egypt and Jordan wanted part of that Palestine from the onset, that is no news. I am talking about the demand of those who were residents of that land itself.

And please, Yes, Palestinian Arabs rejected the partition plan proposed in the 1940s. They opposed the very idea of partition and considered the plan unfair, particularly because it allocated a significant portion of the land to a Jewish state. Their rejection stemmed from a refusal to accept any form of partition, as their leaders did not recognize the legitimacy of such a division.

The Jews were only 30% of the population and they were given 55% of the land, including several areas that are ancestral lands to many Arabs and they will have to be displaced from their land which they had been for hundreds of years. resisting was the most natural thing to do.

Even if the UN offered 10% of the land to a Jewish state, Arabs would still have been right to reject it. The majority of the Jewish people living in Palestine were recent arrivals, who had been granted permission to settle in Palestine by a colonial power that lacked any legitimacy to allow such a thing to happen, and which was rejected by the local population which openly revolted against it. When you merely object to the proportions allocated to each state, you're implicitly giving legitimacy to the British colonial project.

obedience4:


Mate, in the end, both sides agreed to the partition of India, both the Hindus and the Muslims. The Muslims wanted it more just like the Jews in 1947 because they were the minority.

There's no evidence of Palestine Arabs rejecting the proposals, the external Arab powers did the talking, Both the Muslim and the Jews knew it was practically impossible for co-habitation and division would have been acceptable by all parties.

The only reason why the Arabs leaders refused the partition of Palestine was because they thought they had the advantage of numbers and superior military apparatus, The bet was that they could crush the newly created Jewish nation with mere military force. Fast forward to today, the same people who were against the partition are now suddenly fighting for it. Why?? the Arabs are no longer in the position of strength they had in I947. The Jews have suddenly become the majority.

P.s Do your own research do you know that the most Palestine Arabs wanted the partition?? The Palestine leadership at the time wanted the separation , but the Arab leaders of Egypt, Syria and Transjordan were the ones who pressured the Palestine leadership to reject the proposal, Do you also know that The king of Transjordan King Abdullah I wanted parts of palestine as part of his own territory. he once ed the partition, he intended that the West Bank area of the British Mandate allocated for the Arab state be annexed to Jordan. king Abdullah held secret meetings with the Jewish Agency and reached an agreement of Jewish non-interference with Jordanian annexation of the West Bank.

Or was it King Farouk of Egypt who wanted all of southern Palestine to be part of Egypt?? Syria labenon and Iraq all wished to take parts of northern Palestine.

Some people have even question the legality of the Arabs leaders rejecting the UN proposal, the leaders of Egypt, Syria Transjordan, Lebanon, simply had no right to reject the proposal on behalf of palestine, a referendum would have been better. The same Arab leaders who were clamouring for an independent Palestine but blocked the formation of a Palestine government, simply because they wanted a piece of the Palestinian cake.

Another difference was in the case of India and Pakistan, there were no immigrant Muslims or Hindus from Europe. Both populations are indigenous and had been living in that territory for centuries. The rapid built up of populations from Europe who are strangers as far as the Arabs are concerned, is the bone of contention. It is on record that more than 80% of the leaders demanding partition on the Jewish side were immigrants. Imagine how you would feel if that were to happen to your people.

Yes, they are demanding for it today because it is a second option in the absence of the best option. The Jews are undoubtedly stronger than them and there is nothing they can do about it. But you can't just expect them to shut up and do nothing about it.

obedience4:


Mate, in the end, both sides agreed to the partition of India, both the Hindus and the Muslims. The Muslims wanted it more just like the Jews in 1947 because they were the minority.

There's no evidence of Palestine Arabs rejecting the proposals, the external Arab powers did the talking, Both the Muslim and the Jews knew it was practically impossible for co-habitation and division would have been acceptable by all parties.

The only reason why the Arabs leaders refused the partition of Palestine was because they thought they had the advantage of numbers and superior military apparatus, The bet was that they could crush the newly created Jewish nation with mere military force. Fast forward to today, the same people who were against the partition are now suddenly fighting for it. Why?? the Arabs are no longer in the position of strength they had in I947. The Jews have suddenly become the majority.

P.s Do your own research do you know that the most Palestine Arabs wanted the partition?? The Palestine leadership at the time wanted the separation , but the Arab leaders of Egypt, Syria and Transjordan were the ones who pressured the Palestine leadership to reject the proposal, Do you also know that The king of Transjordan King Abdullah I wanted parts of palestine as part of his own territory. he once ed the partition, he intended that the West Bank area of the British Mandate allocated for the Arab state be annexed to Jordan. king Abdullah held secret meetings with the Jewish Agency and reached an agreement of Jewish non-interference with Jordanian annexation of the West Bank.

Or was it King Farouk of Egypt who wanted all of southern Palestine to be part of Egypt?? Syria labenon and Iraq all wished to take parts of northern Palestine.

Some people have even question the legality of the Arabs leaders rejecting the UN proposal, the leaders of Egypt, Syria Transjordan, Lebanon, simply had no right to reject the proposal on behalf of palestine, a referendum would have been better. The same Arab leaders who were clamouring for an independent Palestine but blocked the formation of a Palestine government, simply because they wanted a piece of the Palestinian cake.

Its either you reason with your anus or you are so malicious that you would see white and call it black. Wake up bro, people around you are not as you.

You said it was Arabs that left their homes because they want to 'drive the Jews to the sea' and I explained how stupid that statement was because it is on record that the Arabs left because the Jews were killing them during the Nakba. Today, the Gazans are trying to avoid leaving because they know that's what the Israelis want so they can take over Gaźa. It's like another Nakba.

That is why they are enduring untold suffering just because they don't want to run away again.

Lawag3:



Well you're proving to be an idiot because the nakbah is primarily about the expulsion of Palestinians Arabs what you describe as a massacre isn't do you know that if you combine both the deaths of Israelis and Arabs during that war the current Gaza war dwarfs it.


In some areas the Jews did expel Palestinians because of the fear that they would aid the Arabs and some communities did but then even the Arabs ordered some communities to evacuate so they won't be caught in the cross fire. They promised them they could come back after chasing the Jews to into the sea. An article was written on this.

Where do you think the 20% percent Arab population of Israel came from they are decendants of Arabs who did not aid the invasion of Israel and they did not evacuate.

Any lands the Palestinians lost they lost in battle they should declared their state but they didn't that's on them.

The way you people turn history on its head is so appalling. You claim it was the Arabs that started attacking the Jews first, knowing fully well people will believe you oncebyou draw comparison with the behavior of fundamentalists like ISIS and Boko Haram.

For the records, most of the violence started at the turn of the 20th century when European immigrants started Zionism and wanted to grab land in Palestine at all costs. I believe Menacheim Begin the terrorist was also an Arab right?

Gbadebo19:

Oga, they did exactly what you wanted. They lived in peace until the so called Palestinians started with attacks because Muslims have never been tolerant. They couldn't tolerate living with the Jews. That led to the need for a partition and guess what, they rejected the partition because they felt they could overpower the Jews. It's been a sorry story for them since.

Thank God you itted that the Indian National Congress agreef to it. Did the Palestinian Arabs agree to the partition of Palestine? They said they don't want partitioning. More tjan 70 percent of the population resisted it, still the world powers carved up half of their country.

And please stop trying to portray me as a Muslim defender. I don't care about religion. Infact, I am a vehement advocate against Islamic fundamentalist which some Western countries like the US promotes. Stop portraying anybody that speaks against oppression as belonging to one religion or the other, that narrative is getting stale.

sainttwist1:
another lamba

Stop rewriting history......just stop pls

The Muslim league were the one who want the partition and it was opposed by the Indian national Congress

Yes, some Muslim were opposed to the partition that is why will still have some Muslim dominated area in India but majority of the Muslim ed the partition.
One of the major excuse given by the Muslim league was difference in religion.

The Indian national Congress agreed to the partition as a compromise to avoid violence.

I understand why you are emotional because of the gaza situation which they brought on themselves but pls stop trying to rewrite history and stop the lamba

Thank you

I am a Christian. I am so glad that I didn't fall for the greatest brainwashing in the history of the world. There are Jews today who also haven't fallen for it.

The desire to paint everything in a religious light, always striving to create parallel comparisons just to enforce a malicious narrative with which to justify oppression, is the greatest threat to human existence today.

The greatest evils in history have been committed under the guise of fighting evil.