NewStats: 3,265,496 , 8,186,972 topics. Date: Sunday, 15 June 2025 at 10:49 AM 175y16

Inasmuch tgis one is saying another thing, kets not forget what tinubu taught us during the last election.
He taught me
1) Money answereth all prayers
While number
2) and most importantly tinubu taught me everyone has a price. Example if he ask you to do something for him and you name a price like 1 million he will tell you he will pay 5 million leaving you with no option than for you to do the job

Very weak damage control.
Akpabio was a practicing lawyer before he went into politics.
He knows what to do.
He should take all his social media wailers and evidence to a court to testify and not here on social media.
Akpabio should stop the weak social media trial he is sponsoring, because he is trying to play the victim.
Why is it taking too long for Akpabio to sue Natasha?
When VDM defame the Falana's, the Falana's did not waste any time to sue VDM to court.
Akpabio should do the needful and stop sending those on his payroll to stop crying for him on social media.

Obiedun:
All enemies of this country we be put to shame. They are doing this because they don't want Yoruba to rule for eight years. 4+4=8

Is OBJ an Haisa or Fulani or Ibo man that rules for 8 years?

ogaemma:
Very weak damage control.
Akpabio was a practicing lawyer before he went into politics.
He knows what to do.
He should take all his social media wailers and evidence to a court to testify and not here on social media.
Akpabio should stop the weak social media trial he is sponsoring, because he is trying to play the victim.
Why is it taking too long for Akpabio to sue Natasha?
When VDM defame the Falana's, the Falana's did not waste any time to sue VDM to court.
Akpabio should do the needful and stop sending those on his payroll to stop crying for him on social media.

The fight began on traditional media and gained traction on social media. Natasha is dodging senate scrutiny and relies on media noise. I suspect they have decided to use the same social media and noise to fight her. I like the fact that they are exposing themselves. I enjoy how Natasha was said to look down on Oby. That woman had a sterling reputation, but ruined it by hobnobbing with politicians who see her as a tool for their case.

All these could have been avoided if Natasha had simply moved to her seat.

Obiedun:
All enemies of this country we be put to shame. They are doing this because they don't want Yoruba to rule for eight years. 4+4=8

U guz are making "very stupid" so ubiquitous.

Didn't Obasanjo rule for 8 years. Is he not Yoruba?

[quote author=Qtsnow post=135212331][/quote]

Personally I feel all these are Natasha's script...social media drama...

geoworldedu:
Lie flies upandan. I don't believe this woman because if Natasha will ever tell anyone that it didn't happen at thiz stage, it can only be her mother she will tell. The fcall she received could have either been made by an impersonator or this duru just mads it all up entirely.

Dr Duru said Natasha didn't know her directly, that she ed a friend (Lian) who linked them together, so there is evidence to establish a connection as third party,Lian was involved in linking them. The chain of can be independently proven through the third party, a mutual friend.
Natasha knows the personality of Dr Duru, that was the reason she ed her to do the dirty job for her, but maybe she followed her heart and decided to work for the highest bidder, after weighing her options and knowing she has more to gain by ing the truth and Akpabio.

emkz:
It might have happened, it might not have happened. But what has been established?

Let us look at it sequentially:

1. Natasha's seat was moved due to defections of lawmakers.

2. She refused to change the seat, and was told she could not be recognized from where she sat. She started yelling and said she could not be silenced. She accused the senate leadership of silencing her. At this time, she did not make any allegations of sexual harassment by Akpabio.

3. She told Brekete radio that she was moved to a part of the senate where the camera would not catch her or catch the eye of the senate president to make contributions.

4. One senator, I think the majority leader, said she had been advised to stand like other senators when the senate leadership procession ed. She refused.

5. In an interview with Arise News, she said she was being victimized for refusing the sexual advances of Akpabio. Her definition of victimization was that her motions were not considered, and a visit to Akpabio's office was that if she took care of him, he'd take care of her. She also said he squeezed her hand suggestively, apparently in the presence of her husband, saying she could come to his house for quality time. At no time was any of these incidents reported to anyone. Their relationship flourished as she still eulogized Akpabio as the best thing to happen since egusi soup on his birthday. She still ed Akpabio and others on foreign trips despite her husband's instruction after the finger squeezing saga.

6. After her interview with Arise News, she submitted a petition to the senate for sexual harassment against Akpabio. The petition was rejected as it was wrongly filed.

7. She also obtained a court order to prevent a probe into her flouting the rules of the senate by quarelling on the floor of the senate. She never offered a defence against her misconduct because there was incontrovertible evidence caught on camera.

8. The senate ethics committee recommended her suspension. The senate unanimously voted to confirm her suspension. She then said the final words: "this injustice will not be sustained". Akpabio had presided over the suspension vote.

9. She then appeared in Interparliamentary Union against protocol, seized Nigeria's slot and submitted an accusation that she was suspended because she made an accusation against the senate president and claimed it was a problem of women. The interparliamentary union presiding officer said they must hear from the other side. The leader of the Nigerian delegation called a press conference to read a letter from the senate leader which stated that she was suspended for shouting on the floor of the senate.

10. Dissatisfied, Natasha appeared in an interview with BBC where she claimed the senate operated like a cult and that anyone who spoke against the leadership would have privileges cut, like removal from juicy committees and denial of foreign trips. She also appeared on Sky News and DW TV and anytime the issue of the actual reason for her suspension was raised, she always wanted to rail on the interviewers as though she wanted to hide the actual reason for her suspension and focus on her sexual accusations matter.

11. During the senate ethics committee hearing into her sexual allegations matter, the main news was that Oby Ezekwesili and Onyekachi Nwaebonyi engaged in a spat that effectively brought the hearing to an end.

12. A judge ordered that both parties refrained from further discussing the matter, and someone released what she said was a satirical letter of apology to Akpabio. In the letter, she glorified herself as a stubborn woman, as though it was a thing of pride.

13. Then the Sandra Duru expose has not been defended by Natasha. Instead, she has attacked Sandra's character to avoid addressing the main issues.

What has now been established?

1. That Natasha flouted senate rules by refusing to take her new seat and speaking from a position where she was not recognized, and refused to stand for the senate leadership procession; indications that she was unaware of the rules governing the senate.

2. That the allegations of sexual harassment in a media house, whether true or not, was an after-thought, an attempt to dodge scrutiny into the misconduct caught on camera. One wonders why the sexual innuendos were not reported until it became convenient to do so.

3. That Natasha violated diplomatic protocols by seizing Nigeria's slot to speak at the Interparliamentary Union to peddle her case. She had claimed to have ed as an independent. One would have expected her to speak as an independent, but she still seized Nigeria's slot. I think she must not go unpunished for that diplomatic slap against Nigeria.

4. She only adopted her petition to the senate by proxy and has not supplied evidence till today.

5. She obviously doesn't want a searchlight to be beamed into her allegations when the demand for evidence is rife. Natasha gets offended when asked for evidence.

6. She added more juice to the story in her media tour, but dodges supplying evidence.

What I think.

Natasha is probably more interested in manipulating the public by steering the narrative into seeing her as the victim and want us to hear and sympathize with her cries without scrutinizing her submission. She was probably used to getting whatever she wants just by snapping her fingers. That is unfair to us. She has made grievous allegations. We ask her to back things up with evidence. We cannot follow her blindly. She probably had a good case against Akpabio, but she mismanaged it due to her predilection for gaslighting, deception and wanton manipulation.

PS: Some people have argued that Sandra Duru is a serial blackmailer and liar. Did Natasha not falsely accuse Reno of doing something that Reno effectively debunked? Why did Natasha delete the evidence when she was caught in a lie? Assuming Sandra Duru is a blackmailer for hire, why exactly did Natasha approach her if not to use her skillset for her purpose?

I cannot believe I read all of this 👀

geoworldedu:
Lie flies upandan. I don't believe this woman because if Natasha will ever tell anyone that it didn't happen at thiz stage, it can only be her mother she will tell. The fcall she received could have either been made by an impersonator or this duru just mads it all up entirely.

Gillible and hungry

The way she was talking seductively and giggling at the senate president was indeed a plot

emkz:
It might have happened, it might not have happened. But what has been established?

Let us look at it sequentially:

1. Natasha's seat was moved due to defections of lawmakers.

2. She refused to change the seat, and was told she could not be recognized from where she sat. She started yelling and said she could not be silenced. She accused the senate leadership of silencing her. At this time, she did not make any allegations of sexual harassment by Akpabio.

3. She told Brekete radio that she was moved to a part of the senate where the camera would not catch her or catch the eye of the senate president to make contributions.

4. One senator, I think the majority leader, said she had been advised to stand like other senators when the senate leadership procession ed. She refused.

5. In an interview with Arise News, she said she was being victimized for refusing the sexual advances of Akpabio. Her definition of victimization was that her motions were not considered, and a visit to Akpabio's office was that if she took care of him, he'd take care of her. She also said he squeezed her hand suggestively, apparently in the presence of her husband, saying she could come to his house for quality time. At no time was any of these incidents reported to anyone. Their relationship flourished as she still eulogized Akpabio as the best thing to happen since egusi soup on his birthday. She still ed Akpabio and others on foreign trips despite her husband's instruction after the finger squeezing saga.

6. After her interview with Arise News, she submitted a petition to the senate for sexual harassment against Akpabio. The petition was rejected as it was wrongly filed.

7. She also obtained a court order to prevent a probe into her flouting the rules of the senate by quarelling on the floor of the senate. She never offered a defence against her misconduct because there was incontrovertible evidence caught on camera.

8. The senate ethics committee recommended her suspension. The senate unanimously voted to confirm her suspension. She then said the final words: "this injustice will not be sustained". Akpabio had presided over the suspension vote.

9. She then appeared in Interparliamentary Union against protocol, seized Nigeria's slot and submitted an accusation that she was suspended because she made an accusation against the senate president and claimed it was a problem of women. The interparliamentary union presiding officer said they must hear from the other side. The leader of the Nigerian delegation called a press conference to read a letter from the senate leader which stated that she was suspended for shouting on the floor of the senate.

10. Dissatisfied, Natasha appeared in an interview with BBC where she claimed the senate operated like a cult and that anyone who spoke against the leadership would have privileges cut, like removal from juicy committees and denial of foreign trips. She also appeared on Sky News and DW TV and anytime the issue of the actual reason for her suspension was raised, she always wanted to rail on the interviewers as though she wanted to hide the actual reason for her suspension and focus on her sexual accusations matter.

11. During the senate ethics committee hearing into her sexual allegations matter, the main news was that Oby Ezekwesili and Onyekachi Nwaebonyi engaged in a spat that effectively brought the hearing to an end.

12. A judge ordered that both parties refrained from further discussing the matter, and someone released what she said was a satirical letter of apology to Akpabio. In the letter, she glorified herself as a stubborn woman, as though it was a thing of pride.

13. Then the Sandra Duru expose has not been defended by Natasha. Instead, she has attacked Sandra's character to avoid addressing the main issues.

What has now been established?

1. That Natasha flouted senate rules by refusing to take her new seat and speaking from a position where she was not recognized, and refused to stand for the senate leadership procession; indications that she was unaware of the rules governing the senate.

2. That the allegations of sexual harassment in a media house, whether true or not, was an after-thought, an attempt to dodge scrutiny into the misconduct caught on camera. One wonders why the sexual innuendos were not reported until it became convenient to do so.

3. That Natasha violated diplomatic protocols by seizing Nigeria's slot to speak at the Interparliamentary Union to peddle her case. She had claimed to have ed as an independent. One would have expected her to speak as an independent, but she still seized Nigeria's slot. I think she must not go unpunished for that diplomatic slap against Nigeria.

4. She only adopted her petition to the senate by proxy and has not supplied evidence till today.

5. She obviously doesn't want a searchlight to be beamed into her allegations when the demand for evidence is rife. Natasha gets offended when asked for evidence.

6. She added more juice to the story in her media tour, but dodges supplying evidence.

What I think.

Natasha is probably more interested in manipulating the public by steering the narrative into seeing her as the victim and want us to hear and sympathize with her cries without scrutinizing her submission. She was probably used to getting whatever she wants just by snapping her fingers. That is unfair to us. She has made grievous allegations. We ask her to back things up with evidence. We cannot follow her blindly. She probably had a good case against Akpabio, but she mismanaged it due to her predilection for gaslighting, deception and wanton manipulation.

PS: Some people have argued that Sandra Duru is a serial blackmailer and liar. Did Natasha not falsely accuse Reno of doing something that Reno effectively debunked? Why did Natasha delete the evidence when she was caught in a lie? Assuming Sandra Duru is a blackmailer for hire, why exactly did Natasha approach her if not to use her skillset for her purpose?

I think your analysis is far enough. Anyone from a neutral ground should be able to deduce the truth by reading this. I used to Natasha but this issue has made me have a restrain to the respect I had for her

All these Totopreneurs from Imo state claiming to be activists, when you check her profile you see that she is nothing more than a gossip for hire.

Dr Duru,we have seen it a long time- that she is just Petty!
I once asked a question ❓
If it's the other way round - that A Woman 👠 Can Also Sexually Assaulted Men( a Man)?.
Would the Man be shouting up and down that he is being Sexually assaulted?
Truth is here- she is being used deliberately,it's part of the Political Orchestration to Manipulate the Southerners - who are always an easy prey because they see Southerners in all these as Greedy,but they are Wrong.

Ah
How much akapio paid??

FireUpNow:


Is OBJ an Haisa or Fulani or Ibo man that rules for 8 years?

What trash is this one spewing? Check your spelling

Obiedun:
All enemies of this country we be put to shame. They are doing this because they don't want Yoruba to rule for eight years. 4+4=8

Oby is a useful idiot

The same idiotic behavior she exhibited during mmesoma-gate

The headless mob are G&H, Gullible and Hungry

Ah Natasha get bad mouth 👄👄👄

Headless mob running helter sketter to help useful idiot oby redeem her shattered and bartered reputation

They are busy reminding us that she was once a vp of the world bank

If reason neva left the headless mob, wetin concern oby for Natasha matter if not amebo

Was she there when akpabio was harassing her sexually Was she the referee


Very ugly homo sapiens, the heroine of some headless mob

what this gender can do, ears have not heard. Tufiakwa! To marry now don dey fear me 😨

helinues:
Abeg are there no important issue again in Nigeria to discuss about apart from Natasha this and that

If Baba Presido Is Sincerely Doing Something to touch the life of the common Nigerians sufferings , there would have been so much to discuss

Obiedun:
All enemies of this country we be put to shame. They are doing this because they don't want Yoruba to rule for eight years. 4+4=8

Akpabio is not Yoruba so I don't know if you can't live without ethnic bias. You are so empty. Tueh!!!!

Obiedun:
All enemies of this country we be put to shame. They are doing this because they don't want Yoruba to rule for eight years. 4+4=8

Sandra herself has no evidence for any of her claims just blabbing. Natasha called her to confess because she is the Pope.

emkz:
It might have happened, it might not have happened. But what has been established?

Let us look at it sequentially:

1. Natasha's seat was moved due to defections of lawmakers.

2. She refused to change the seat, and was told she could not be recognized from where she sat. She started yelling and said she could not be silenced. She accused the senate leadership of silencing her. At this time, she did not make any allegations of sexual harassment by Akpabio.

3. She told Brekete radio that she was moved to a part of the senate where the camera would not catch her or catch the eye of the senate president to make contributions.

4. One senator, I think the majority leader, said she had been advised to stand like other senators when the senate leadership procession ed. She refused.

5. In an interview with Arise News, she said she was being victimized for refusing the sexual advances of Akpabio. Her definition of victimization was that her motions were not considered, and a visit to Akpabio's office was that if she took care of him, he'd take care of her. She also said he squeezed her hand suggestively, apparently in the presence of her husband, saying she could come to his house for quality time. At no time was any of these incidents reported to anyone. Their relationship flourished as she still eulogized Akpabio as the best thing to happen since egusi soup on his birthday. She still ed Akpabio and others on foreign trips despite her husband's instruction after the finger squeezing saga.

6. After her interview with Arise News, she submitted a petition to the senate for sexual harassment against Akpabio. The petition was rejected as it was wrongly filed.

7. She also obtained a court order to prevent a probe into her flouting the rules of the senate by quarelling on the floor of the senate. She never offered a defence against her misconduct because there was incontrovertible evidence caught on camera.

8. The senate ethics committee recommended her suspension. The senate unanimously voted to confirm her suspension. She then said the final words: "this injustice will not be sustained". Akpabio had presided over the suspension vote.

9. She then appeared in Interparliamentary Union against protocol, seized Nigeria's slot and submitted an accusation that she was suspended because she made an accusation against the senate president and claimed it was a problem of women. The interparliamentary union presiding officer said they must hear from the other side. The leader of the Nigerian delegation called a press conference to read a letter from the senate leader which stated that she was suspended for shouting on the floor of the senate.

10. Dissatisfied, Natasha appeared in an interview with BBC where she claimed the senate operated like a cult and that anyone who spoke against the leadership would have privileges cut, like removal from juicy committees and denial of foreign trips. She also appeared on Sky News and DW TV and anytime the issue of the actual reason for her suspension was raised, she always wanted to rail on the interviewers as though she wanted to hide the actual reason for her suspension and focus on her sexual accusations matter.

11. During the senate ethics committee hearing into her sexual allegations matter, the main news was that Oby Ezekwesili and Onyekachi Nwaebonyi engaged in a spat that effectively brought the hearing to an end.

12. A judge ordered that both parties refrained from further discussing the matter, and someone released what she said was a satirical letter of apology to Akpabio. In the letter, she glorified herself as a stubborn woman, as though it was a thing of pride.

13. Then the Sandra Duru expose has not been defended by Natasha. Instead, she has attacked Sandra's character to avoid addressing the main issues.

What has now been established?

1. That Natasha flouted senate rules by refusing to take her new seat and speaking from a position where she was not recognized, and refused to stand for the senate leadership procession; indications that she was unaware of the rules governing the senate.

2. That the allegations of sexual harassment in a media house, whether true or not, was an after-thought, an attempt to dodge scrutiny into the misconduct caught on camera. One wonders why the sexual innuendos were not reported until it became convenient to do so.

3. That Natasha violated diplomatic protocols by seizing Nigeria's slot to speak at the Interparliamentary Union to peddle her case. She had claimed to have ed as an independent. One would have expected her to speak as an independent, but she still seized Nigeria's slot. I think she must not go unpunished for that diplomatic slap against Nigeria.

4. She only adopted her petition to the senate by proxy and has not supplied evidence till today.

5. She obviously doesn't want a searchlight to be beamed into her allegations when the demand for evidence is rife. Natasha gets offended when asked for evidence.

6. She added more juice to the story in her media tour, but dodges supplying evidence.

What I think.

Natasha is probably more interested in manipulating the public by steering the narrative into seeing her as the victim and want us to hear and sympathize with her cries without scrutinizing her submission. She was probably used to getting whatever she wants just by snapping her fingers. That is unfair to us. She has made grievous allegations. We ask her to back things up with evidence. We cannot follow her blindly. She probably had a good case against Akpabio, but she mismanaged it due to her predilection for gaslighting, deception and wanton manipulation.

PS: Some people have argued that Sandra Duru is a serial blackmailer and liar. Did Natasha not falsely accuse Reno of doing something that Reno effectively debunked? Why did Natasha delete the evidence when she was caught in a lie? Assuming Sandra Duru is a blackmailer for hire, why exactly did Natasha approach her if not to use her skillset for her purpose?

Gbamsulotely end of thread ,Haha 🤣

jaxxy:


Sandra herself has no evidence for any of her claims just blabbing. Natasha called her to confess because she is the Pope.

What about the call logs? Did you read at all?

creativejagaban:


Oby is a useful idiot

The same idiotic behavior she exhibited during mmesoma-gate

The headless mob are G&H, Gullible and Hungry

Ah Natasha get bad mouth 👄👄👄

Headless mob running helter sketter to help useful idiot oby redeem her shattered and bartered reputation

They are busy reminding us that she was once a vp of the world bank

If reason neva left the headless mob, wetin concern oby for Natasha matter if not amebo

Was she there when akpabio was harassing her sexually Was she the referee


Very ugly homo sapiens, the heroine of some headless mob

The headless mob are in a dilemma

They don't know whether to hate Natasha for calling their mama a useful idiot 😭

Or

Whether they should continue their headless ranting and wailing on the sexual harassment

Some of them don't even know the meaning of sexual harassment, they just jumped onto their keyboard typing rubbish so far the Akpabio they hate is being accused.


Now, Rufai, one of the G&H has been exposed for who he is

Rufai was paid for ing the cause...for giving awards.....for always shouting and wailing to the iration of the headless mob

All headless mob will never have rest of mind till 2031.

Women always and all the time use sexuel harassment to blackmail, and ironically, generality of people are wont to believe them when such sentiment is whipped up.

MrSly:

Akpabio is not Yoruba so I don't know if you can't live without ethnic bias. You are so empty. Tueh!!!!

Kindly read the following
Prof Mgbeke said that she insisted that Natasha must talk to her first for her to take up further her case against Akpabio.

Then on Mar 27, 2025, Natasha talked to her and offered to pay her but she said that she wanted her to tell her what really happened. How she was sexually harassed. She said that she’s a member of the UN Council.

It was then that Natasha told her that there was no sexual harassment. She said that she was jolted. She was jolted because before then, she had started attacking Akpabio on her platform.

Prof Mgbeke said that Natasha said that Oby was paid and Arise tv was bought.

She said that she asked her if she told Oby that there’s no sexual harassment by Akpabio and she responded that Oby knew but that they have to fight for women.

She said that she was offered N200m to her ambit she rejected it. She said earlier in the live video that Natasha denied ever speaking to her. (Lol)

She said that Natasha told her that because she doesn’t have evidence since it did not happen, she recruited Oby and others to go to the senate committee to cause chaos while the committee seats.

Natasha said that Oby and others are useful eediots.

Mgbeke said that she then requested for a letter to be committed officially.

Natasha then told her that she doesn’t want any th contractual between them and at that point Natasha disappeared.

Then, Natasha went back to the top politician who is in part of the whole episode of the blackmail and told him a different thing from what she discussed with her and the politician did not know that Natasha had already exposed herself to her because she did not know ggad she would reject her offer of N200m.

Natasha had told her a lot about herself.

Natasha said that it was a sponsored attack on Yoruba government does not do eight years and that it has nothing to do with Sen Akpabio at all.

Natasha said that she will be made the governor of Kogi state if she succeeded or minister of petroleum.

Natasha was angry that Oby did not do well at the Senate committee’s hearing after the huge amount of money she was paid.

Natasha told her that they only wanted the Senate President out because he’s the one shielding the President.

She said that Natasha mentioned the names of those sponsoring her against the Yoruba government but she said that won’t mention the names now as she (Mgbeke) has submitted the names to security agents.

Natasha told her that gullible and hungry Nigerians will listen and accept any bad thing is said against the government and that Arise has been paid for this purpose.

She then gave Prof Mgbeke a list of international agencies she wanted her to write to. She said Oby was not doing enough. Then she deleted all her messages to her but Mgbeke had already read it all.

Natasha thinks money can do anything and so she does not listen to you when she’s talking. She does not know that I’m top consultant.

Natasha said that Akpabio killed someone for organ harvesting and that since the sexual harassment thing is no longer flying, she can use the organ harvesting episode.

So Prof Mgbeke asked for evidence for that.

Natasha told me that there’s no such thing as sexual harassment and that’s why Oby was sent to disrupt the seating of the senate committee.

Prof Mgbeke said that was surprised that Natasha was coming up with another allegation when they’ve not finished the first one.

Natasha started threatening her when she rejected her offer.

I wrote to all concerned govt agencies over the organ harvesting but there was no proof and so I advised Natasha that she’s lied. There is yet no evidence in this your new allegation. She started offering money. She wanted to destroy a Yoruba government for her to become governor of Kogi state or a minister.

That’s where I stopped listening to Prof Mgbeke.

Summary: Like all sensible people knew, it was a sponsored allegation. Everyone who is reasonable knew that Oby acted a script at the senate committee.

Obiedun:
All enemies of this country we be put to shame. They are doing this because they don't want Yoruba to rule for eight years. 4+4=8

Bro this is not about tribe. Keep that one aside on this matter

creativejagaban:


The headless mob are in a dilemma

They don't know whether to hate Natasha for calling their mama a useful idiot 😭

Or

Whether they should continue their headless ranting and wailing on the sexual harassment

Some of them don't even know the meaning of sexual harassment, they just jumped onto their keyboard typing rubbish so far the Akpabio they hate is being accused.


Now, Rufai, one of the G&H has been exposed for who he is

Rufai was paid for ing the cause...for giving awards.....for always shouting and wailing to the iration of the headless mob

All headless mob will never have rest of mind till 2031.

Meanwhile, Nnamdi Kanu is cowardly talking at the court.

Video evidences plenty of how he instructed his headless mob to burn and kill and destroy during the end sars....

Meanwhile the useful idiot coward himself they hotel dey back woman when his headless mob were killing, burning and destroying Omoluabi's properties in Lagos.


Now they are bringing their idiotic behavior to edo state now, challenging the monarch to a battle

Edo people, wise up now. It is not too late.
Delta is wi already.
Akwa ibom is wi now.
Cross river already wised up

Fubara too is warming up to wise up.

Okoroawusa:

Bro this is not about tribe. Keep that one aside on this matter

kindly read this
Prof Mgbeke said that she insisted that Natasha must talk to her first for her to take up further her case against Akpabio.

Then on Mar 27, 2025, Natasha talked to her and offered to pay her but she said that she wanted her to tell her what really happened. How she was sexually harassed. She said that she’s a member of the UN Council.

It was then that Natasha told her that there was no sexual harassment. She said that she was jolted. She was jolted because before then, she had started attacking Akpabio on her platform.

Prof Mgbeke said that Natasha said that Oby was paid and Arise tv was bought.

She said that she asked her if she told Oby that there’s no sexual harassment by Akpabio and she responded that Oby knew but that they have to fight for women.

She said that she was offered N200m to her ambit she rejected it. She said earlier in the live video that Natasha denied ever speaking to her. (Lol)

She said that Natasha told her that because she doesn’t have evidence since it did not happen, she recruited Oby and others to go to the senate committee to cause chaos while the committee seats.

Natasha said that Oby and others are useful eediots.

Mgbeke said that she then requested for a letter to be committed officially.

Natasha then told her that she doesn’t want any th contractual between them and at that point Natasha disappeared.

Then, Natasha went back to the top politician who is in part of the whole episode of the blackmail and told him a different thing from what she discussed with her and the politician did not know that Natasha had already exposed herself to her because she did not know ggad she would reject her offer of N200m.

Natasha had told her a lot about herself.

Natasha said that it was a sponsored attack on Yoruba government does not do eight years and that it has nothing to do with Sen Akpabio at all.

Natasha said that she will be made the governor of Kogi state if she succeeded or minister of petroleum.

Natasha was angry that Oby did not do well at the Senate committee’s hearing after the huge amount of money she was paid.

Natasha told her that they only wanted the Senate President out because he’s the one shielding the President.

She said that Natasha mentioned the names of those sponsoring her against the Yoruba government but she said that won’t mention the names now as she (Mgbeke) has submitted the names to security agents.

Natasha told her that gullible and hungry Nigerians will listen and accept any bad thing is said against the government and that Arise has been paid for this purpose.

She then gave Prof Mgbeke a list of international agencies she wanted her to write to. She said Oby was not doing enough. Then she deleted all her messages to her but Mgbeke had already read it all.

Natasha thinks money can do anything and so she does not listen to you when she’s talking. She does not know that I’m top consultant.

Natasha said that Akpabio killed someone for organ harvesting and that since the sexual harassment thing is no longer flying, she can use the organ harvesting episode.

So Prof Mgbeke asked for evidence for that.

Natasha told me that there’s no such thing as sexual harassment and that’s why Oby was sent to disrupt the seating of the senate committee.

Prof Mgbeke said that was surprised that Natasha was coming up with another allegation when they’ve not finished the first one.

Natasha started threatening her when she rejected her offer.

I wrote to all concerned govt agencies over the organ harvesting but there was no proof and so I advised Natasha that she’s lied. There is yet no evidence in this your new allegation. She started offering money. She wanted to destroy a Yoruba government for her to become governor of Kogi state or a minister.

That’s where I stopped listening to Prof Mgbeke.

Summary: Like all sensible people knew, it was a sponsored allegation. Everyone who is reasonable knew that Oby acted a script at the senate committee.

Sandra. Leave Akpabio make he defend himself. Nobody call you for the matter.


Ozuor

Obiedun:
What about the call logs? Did you read at all?

Call log does say anything about what was discussed. So Natasha will just call her to confess without knowing her properly? Is Natasha stupid like bobrisky?

After that Sandra woman said she doesn't know who akpabio or yahaya bello is I stopped taking her seriously.

Mother-Confessor, I hail you.

I hope the pay-off is worth it.